dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
Calculus is sort of useless as proof when you are dealing with somebody who probably does not grasp basic arithmetic.
Least. Plausible. Fantasy. Ever.
9/11-investigator said:America is a luxury European Civilization can no longer afford.
So you need to go. And that's what you will. And 9/11 will be the catalyst. And it will be brought about by a temporarily alliance between Europe, Russia, China, Japan, Iran and others and patriotic forces within the US (Constitutionalists, think Ron Paul). And after 9/11 will come the abolition of the FED, an institution captured by Jewish private bankers located in London in 1913 and currently costs Euro-America 40 million $ per hour on interest payments with which its complete political system is corrupted, bought and paid for.
Next we are going to liberate you.
Ever.
Calculus is sort of useless as proof when you are dealing with somebody who probably does not grasp basic arithmetic.
Magi has started a thread with this at the 9/11 Truth Movement Forums as well. I'm providing a link because I figure there might be a good Stundie nomination or two to be had when the twoofers over there start posting responses.
socialservice said:Magi, you wrote :
quote :
"The original disaster were filmed with cameras in set positions."
On what grounds/available evidence have you established for yourself this belief ?
Olie was trying to tell you that the 9/11 imagery was originally made in the virtual world.
Your idea is good - but founded on a wrong premise : that the 9/11 footage was filmed with real cameras. However, your idea (adequately revised) could serve an excellent, educational purpose : to show how, today, even a small-budget set-up could reproduce even superior virtual imagery than that sorry mess proposed on TV on September 11, 2001. In that sense, I'd encourage you to go ahead with such a project - although I cannot promise you my support...as I am by now pretty well fed-up with scanning virtual imagery!
Your idea is good - but founded on a wrong premise : that the 9/11 footage was filmed with real cameras.

(Linky. ATS, of course, 2nd home of the paranoid, after the David Icke forums.)random moonbat said:I have had been looking at the Apollo landing site pictures today.
Very poor quality and not much to see. What seemed really weird was that the
objects were a lot brighter than their surroundings and seemed to cast long straight shadows.
I wondered why no other object in the surrounding area cast shadows like the orbiters.
Yeah, that'd work.ATS moonbat said:So couldn't we put bigger lens with a huge light on an orbiter?
Thanks for that. Here's the topmost comment, from "erosensai"I win: 10s of thousands of Stundies:
http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=RMINSD7MmT4
I even got in there somewhere with my own Stundie when I started accusing the moon landing deniers as being Chinese spies recruited to undermine the US government.
Yea, its not hard to shoot a UMV on the moon soo idk why that was brought up, im talking about putting a man on the moon, having enough fuel and the cunning edge technology in order to do so man. Think about it, Technology has such a rapid rate of change, if we DID do that in 1969, why hasnt it been done already?
http://community.theblackvault.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1028posted by fibrotj :
Ppl, get ready because according to a number of resources, Planet X should be making it's "entrance on the last stage-scene" very, very soon!! The stupid government thinks they have us ALL fooled, while they continue to build their underground "safehavens," allthewhile, taking more & more of the ppl's money, so they can afford their ongoing-construction of their underground fortresses!! God will see to their doom anyways...it's written in His Word in the last book of Revelations, and prophesied by numerous ancient Prophets including John the Revelator, Daniel, King David, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, & Malachi...just to name a few!!!!
If there is anyone on here who does NOT know GOD & His son, Jesus Christ as Lord & Savior, I would KINDLY & with Love, suggest opening a Bible, & studying for yourself, the Holy Word of God!!! His Word has NEVER been off (in error), one inkling...every prophecy mentioned in the Bible has come to pass with 100% accuracy, & the prophecies yet to come...will certainly come to pass as well!!! GOD SAID SO!! NO OTHER PROPHET (aside from the prophets of God), can claim this...not even Nostradaumus!! JESUS IS COMING SOON...SO IS PLANET X!! Be ready!!
TiGeR said:Atheists, how did leap year occur? While computing the days of rotation of earth around sun, one extra day..?
..was found which could not be adjusted since it wasn't a full day. So, the extra day was called a leap day which was added to every consecutive fourth year. Now, how did this occur? Where did this extra day come from?
In Bible, it says in the book of Joshua that God stopped Sun in the sky which did not move until Israelites won a war. It means, the rotation of the earth was stopped for sometime, which caused extra time requirement for the earth to finish its regular rotation around the sun, thus causing extra time added to the whole period of 365 days.
You see, everything is true in Bible when scientifically explore each of its incidents.
I just saw the photos! WHAT A JOKE!
It is obvious that NASA made an egregious mistake. The show SHADOWS OF
ALL THE LUNAR MODULES. This is ridiculous because THE ASTRONAUTS USED
THE LUNAR MODULES TO RETURN, otherwise they would still be on the moon!
This will not fool anyone except the public.
The modules (which they name on all photos) returned to the orbiter, allegedly.
Only thing left behind were the skinny base with pipe legs which would cast
miniscule shadows. What a gaffe!
They faked all previous photos. These seem to be faked also.
Jack
This one's borderline given that it's mostly religion, but I think the research methods being employed here are rather similar to those used by our CT friends.
ETA: Forgot the link
Yea, its not hard to shoot a UMV on the moon soo idk why that was brought up, im talking about putting a man on the moon, having enough fuel and the cunning edge technology in order to do so man. Think about it, Technology has such a rapid rate of change, if we DID do that in 1969, why hasnt it been done already?
Here's one that isn't quite a stundie, but certainly a good one.
"The low casualty count at the Towers and the minimal damage to neighboring structures or pedestrians made it possible for Rumsfeld and Cheney to stonewall any real investigations into the event."
Huh?? almost 3000 people killed, many BILLIONS of dollars of damage to other buildings, MANY of which didn't survive?? Ok, I can understand that.
Linky?? Yep. Here you go.
http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=218&topic_id=10676&mesg_id=10686
This forum is FULL of stundies. Too bad it is VERY difficult to navigate.
Thanks for that. Here's the topmost comment, from "erosensai"
noobie64 said:If this interstellar travel and return from another world was in fact achieved 40 years ago, then it was the most monumental achievement accomplished by the human race. Why would you erase the film of it on purpose to save money when your budget its countless billions. This is what NASA is in fact telling us they did. I just can't ****ing buy it. It's like 1000000 times worse than taping over your wedding with the superbowl.
Who is redoing the copies? Hollywood of course.
Oh, wow...I absolutely love the phrase "cunning edge technology." I may start a campaign to get it to replace "cutting edge..."