Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The theory, as I understand it, is that the energy of the hurricane was harvested by the HAARP array and used to power an energy beam that was used to destroy the Twin Towers. Sadly, this is not a theory it's possible to find expounded in any detail without clicking on lunatic websites, more or less by definition.

Dave
Oh my. A quick google search shows me that almost every page result for 'HAARP weapon' features both that phrase and the words "chem trails." For example - HAARPS 9-11 ROLE - Chemtrail Central Forum.

I guess that the same sort of brain who thinks that tens of thousands of their fellow citizens are in on a silent conspiracy to murder thousands, can believe just about anything. Woo.
 
It will be obvious that a hurricane bigger than Katrina hovering off the coast of New York on 9/11 is very important news. It was there BEFORE anything was known about the 9/11 attacks. It was just another day as far as anybody knew. Yet it was not reported on the morning news on 9/11 (I've seen at least one TV clip of a morning weather advisory broadcast before the attacks and it's not mentioned at all)


You can not, I mean really CAN NOT be so hopelessly desperate for evidence that 9/11 was an inside job that you actually bring up this invisible wisp of nothing; that the fact that early morning newscasts didn't make more copious mention of some hurricane out at sea, before 9/11 came by and changed literally everything, is proof that the news media knew beforehand that 9/11 was about to happen!! Not only is this mind-numbingly stupid (and gosh, try as I might I can't think of more appropriate adjectives to describe this), it also supposes that the entire new media, who couldn't keep their mouths shut to save their lives and would gleefully broadcast pictures of their own grandmothers having sex if they thought it might help ratings, have somehow managed to keep totally silent about what they knew!! I'd believe Pentagon flyovers and space-beam weapons before I would accept even the remotest possibility that the news media could keep such a secret for eight years.

This gotta be a joke. If it isn't -- well, I can only describe it as truly sad.
 
Last edited:
It will be obvious that a hurricane bigger than Katrina hovering off the coast of New York on 9/11 is very important news. It was there BEFORE anything was known about the 9/11 attacks. It was just another day as far as anybody knew. Yet it was not reported on the morning news on 9/11 (I've seen at least one TV clip of a morning weather advisory broadcast before the attacks and it's not mentioned at all)

And why were no warnings given or preparations made to deal with the massive destruction that such a huge hurricane could cause - and did cause in the case of Katrina which was actually smaller than the one off New York on 9/11 ?

For you to say that this behaviour is not surprising is ....I can't think of the word......

I can.
 
I live in statistically the most vulnerable coastal city in the United States when it comes to hurricanes so if the forecast tracks are in agreement that the track will not take through my area I'd rather not start putting up my shutters when I don't have to. It's an annoying pain in the ass to put those things up.
 
what's up with the hurricane?

bump for mr. smith. paging mr. smith.

I second that request. There was a hurricane in the North Atlantic, that was not predicted to hit the US coast. It was "not reported on the morning news" (according to bill smith).

What in the world does this have to do with anything?
 
Interesting article about the people responsible for identifying the remains of the 9/11 victims (and hijackers), from January 2009, that I do not recall seeing here (though I am sure it might have been). Interesting read for those who have not...

http://www.newsweek.com/id/177724/page/1

Scientists are still trying. More than seven years later, the effort continues to identify the missing victims—and hijackers. Shaler and his successors have fulfilled at least part of their promise to the families. Through a combination of innovative DNA-mapping techniques, help from the FBI's crime lab and dumb luck, the scientists have now ID'd four of the 10 New York hijackers. The remains of the nine hijackers from the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crash sites have also been confirmed; six other hijackers have yet to be identified.

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
I live in statistically the most vulnerable coastal city in the United States when it comes to hurricanes so if the forecast tracks are in agreement that the track will not take through my area I'd rather not start putting up my shutters when I don't have to. It's an annoying pain in the ass to put those things up.

You must live in Florida. I do also.

2004 was fun!! Well, in that "I would rather sandpaper the rear end of an alligator in a phonebooth" kinda way.
 
You must live in Florida. I do also.

2004 was fun!! Well, in that "I would rather sandpaper the rear end of an alligator in a phonebooth" kinda way.

Pffft, 2004 was fun... nah... Went through both Katrina and Wilma in 2005 :)
My area got flooded in Katrina, and we lost our hurricane shutters from the sliding glass door in Wilma. Two experiences, the latter in particular I could have done without
 
He simply doesn't care. He has zero interest in learning about anything inconvenient to the ridiculous myths he clings to.

At this point the moment I start hearing HAARP and directed energy beams I'll pretty much start ignoring the person entirely... Some of the resident TM oriented members are having issue with bill's claims and that's saying something...
 
Last edited:
Can anyone give me a concise explanation of why some people think that hurricane is related to 9/11. I try to avoid clicking on links to lunatic websites so I am avoiding Woods.

You've had answers by now, here's what I found on Hurricane Erin:

'Her main issue with Erin seems to be that it was travelling toward the Eastern Seaboard from Bermuda, but there was no evacuation order in NYC. She finds that suspicious, as if 'they' whomever the conspirators supposedly are, deliberately ordered the hurricane to stop near NY, so knew it wouldn't hit land.
But it was supposedly close enough to supply power for the field effects which destroyed the towers, according to Dr. Wood.

Here's a report from the National Hurricane Centre, Nov 2001

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html#TABLE5


Note that on (Sept) 9/2100 (hrs) Hurricane warning changed to tropical storm warning and
(Sept) 10/1500 (hrs) Tropical storm warning discontinued

from table 4.

Also note that shipping reports of wind speeds of the storm just before 9/11 were:

Date/Time (Sept) 9/1800 Lat 32 Lon 65 windspeed in Knots/35

Last time I checked 35 knots wouldn't do diddly squat to anybody...... don't tell bill smith this, let him continue his pathetic delusions.


I almost forgot, that the storm moved NE sometime late Sept 11 or on Sept 12'

This is from a thread I started earlier this year on Judy Wood and the Hutchison effect.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4737113#post4737113
 
Last edited:
Wow. Thanks - I glanced through that thread and learned that mentioning Judy Wood is akin to "Holocaust Denial." Having never heard of Ms. Wood until a few days ago, I was ... not impressed with her thoughts.

Anyway, Mr. Smith is due here to explain why he mentioned a hurricane in a discussion of terrorist attacks. I anxiously await his thoughts. :)
 
At a guess, I'd say he thinks the hurricane was actually some freak side effect of whatever method was used to bring down the towers. The 2,119,733rd "smoking gun" of 9-11.
 
What was your band name again?
Soggy pants?:D

The properties of fluid dynamics and wind resistance being what they are...yeah that's pretty much exactly what happened.

Had to change coveralls.

That's one for the "seemed like a good idea at the time" file.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom