"We will kill 9/11 CT skeptics after 9/11 Truth comes out."

[aggle-rithm]

My statement wasn’t vague. Real life is unpredictable.

So, as I said: “some doo doo may well become airborne and hit some fans” this summer.

which to all you over-excited guys 'n' girls means

Eeek! A general uprising!

Have fun with your hallucinations.

Thanks for reading this post. You may all now return to your comfortable, dependable, little, Good Guy/Bad Guy twoofer hobby world!

If you don't want your statements to be misinterpreted, then perhaps you should learn to communicate more clearly.

If, on the other hand, you are merely a troll who relishes the opportunity to engage in pointless bickering over semantics, then by all means stay the course.

 

[TjW]

Hey, I have an idea. How about if you say exactly what you mean, without metaphor, simile, or analogy? Just a few declarative sentences, in plain unvarnished English. You would be amazed how that sort of thing clears up these little communication problems.

What, and give up show business?

 

[Elizabeth I]

If you don't want your statements to be misinterpreted, then perhaps you should learn to communicate more clearly.

If, on the other hand, you are merely a troll who relishes the opportunity to engage in pointless bickering over semantics, then by all means stay the course.

Hey, I have an idea. How about if you say exactly what you mean, without metaphor, simile, or analogy? Just a few declarative sentences, in plain unvarnished English. You would be amazed how that sort of thing clears up these little communication problems.

What, and give up show business?

Where's the warden when you need him?

 

[Foolmewunz]

<snip>

You obviously take me for even more of an idiot than I thought .

I don't think that would be possible.

 

[JihadJane]

Did you purposely misrepresent the content of my post?

I didn’t misrepresent it.

I observed that when GWB and D.C. wanted to make people believe that Iraq was responsible for 911 BUT also wanted to make sure they could in fact deny having actually said such a thing they simply worded their speech such to mention both 911 and Iraq back to back.

In your case you opined on the possibility of the 'general' public (ie. not a small faction, not an identifiable group but a large cross section of USA society) and used a term usually reserved for truly bad actions.

I conclude that you A) actually were considering the possibility of general uprisings and wanted to be able to take credit for predicting them if they occured
AND
B) acknowledging the fact that you would be roundly thrummed should they not occur.
chose to use the same method that the past administration used.
Having been called on it now you are attempting to colour your statement and tell us that since life is unpredictable you were deliberately being vague (that is to say unspecific)

I understood your GWB analogy.

Your conclusions are completely wrong and hallucinatory.

Hey, I have an idea. How about if you say exactly what you mean, without metaphor, simile, or analogy? Just a few declarative sentences, in plain unvarnished English. You would be amazed how that sort of thing clears up these little communication problems.

Please explain exactly what you don’t understand about the following statement:

Definition:

'When the unrandiesque word hits the fan':

"When the situation goes awry; when trouble starts."

http://dictionary.reference.com

A massive heist ("bail-out") has been pulled off at the expense of present and future taxpayers, on the pretext that, without it, the US economy would collapse. We are assured that the bail-outs , along with the economic stimulus plan, are working and that things are getting better. In the summer it is likely that dire economic indicators (e.g.: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/03/business/economy/03jobs.html?_r=2&th&emc=th **) will mean that it is no longer possible to hide the unpleasant truth - the US economy is still getting much worse. If/when that happens the 'Yes We Can" Obama administration will be in trouble. The feel-good facade would certainly be wearing very thin.

It says a lot for people here's faith in the great US democracy (or their political naivety) that the only possible expression of anger they can imagine to this situation is an immediate, general uprising. Dream on!

** “The numbers are indicative of a continued, very severe recession,” said Stuart G. Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services in Pittsburgh. “There’s nothing in here to show that the economy and the market are pulling out of the grip of recession.”

 

[INRM]

So basically, anyone who holds a conspiracy theory or is critical of the government should be labled a domestic terrorist?

 

[T.A.M.]

So basically, anyone who holds a conspiracy theory or is critical of the government should be labled a domestic terrorist?

Nope.

TAM

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

So basically, anyone who holds a conspiracy theory or is critical of the government should be labled a domestic terrorist?

No.

Where do you get these crazy ideas?

 

[Thunder]

paranoia and conspiracy thinking go hand in hand.

 

[INRM]

Because on page 5, apparently a written report shown apparently lists people who hold conspiracy theory beliefs, and beliefs that show distrust for the government are basically viewed by the government as being a threat to national security and more or less seems to imply they should be viewed as domestic-terrorists.

 

[T.A.M.]

Because on page 5, apparently a written report shown apparently lists people who hold conspiracy theory beliefs, and beliefs that show distrust for the government are basically viewed by the government as being a threat to national security and more or less seems to imply they should be viewed as domestic-terrorists.

Page five of this thread, or page five of the report.

Better yet, please quote exactly what you are referring to.

Thanks

TAM

 

[tfk]

Because on page 5, apparently a written report shown apparently lists people who hold conspiracy theory beliefs, and beliefs that show distrust for the government are basically viewed by the government as being a threat to national security and more or less seems to imply they should be viewed as domestic-terrorists.

.
Wow.

Sure you kinda sorta want to possibly go all, or perhaps maybe some of the way out on that limb ...??

[... or possible arboreal appendage.]

Tom

 

[1337m4n]

Please explain exactly what you don’t understand about the following statement:

The fact that it isn't a statement?

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Because on page 5, apparently a written report shown apparently lists people who hold conspiracy theory beliefs, and beliefs that show distrust for the government are basically viewed by the government as being a threat to national security and more or less seems to imply they should be viewed as domestic-terrorists.

So....you can't produce a citation? Just a general-kinda sorta-maybe if you look at it a certain way-I read it on the internet-Alex Jones thinks so-more or less-I didn't really comprehend the document but I found some words that looked really scary-sort of way?

 

[JihadJane]

The fact that it isn't a statement?

What is it?

 

[funk de fino]

What is it?

Biased, cherry picking claptrap.

 

[1337m4n]

What is it?

A disorganized wall of text.

When people say "statement", they generally mean one single expression. There were at least 7 things in your wall of text that could potentially qualify as "statements", so you need to specify what you mean by "the following statement":

Definition:

'When the unrandiesque word hits the fan':

"When the situation goes awry; when trouble starts."

http://dictionary.reference.com

A definition is one.

A massive heist ("bail-out") has been pulled off at the expense of present and future taxpayers, on the pretext that, without it, the US economy would collapse.

Two.

We are assured that the bail-outs , along with the economic stimulus plan, are working and that things are getting better.

Three.

In the summer it is likely that dire economic indicators (e.g.: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/03/bu..._r=2&th&emc=th **) will mean that it is no longer possible to hide the unpleasant truth - the US economy is still getting much worse.

Four.

If/when that happens the 'Yes We Can" Obama administration will be in trouble. The feel-good facade would certainly be wearing very thin.

Five.

It says a lot for people here's faith in the great US democracy (or their political naivety) that the only possible expression of anger they can imagine to this situation is an immediate, general uprising. Dream on!

Six.

“The numbers are indicative of a continued, very severe recession,” said Stuart G. Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services in Pittsburgh. “There’s nothing in here to show that the economy and the market are pulling out of the grip of recession.”

Seven.



Seven "statements" (none of which answer the question of what exactly you meant by **** hitting the fan BTW), but you used "the following statement" in the singular, so I'm not really sure what kind of response you were aiming for.

 

[JihadJane]

A disorganized wall of text.

When people say "statement", they generally mean one single expression.

Look up "statement" in a dictionary and you will discover that your generally meaning people have misunderstood what the word "statement" means. A statement can go on for pages. It can be a whole book.

There were at least 7 things in your wall of text that could potentially qualify as "statements", so you need to specify what you mean by "the following statement":

...

Seven "statements" (none of which answer the question of what exactly you meant by **** hitting the fan BTW), but you used "the following statement" in the singular, so I'm not really sure what kind of response you were aiming for.

I have no idea what the specifics of "the **** hitting the fan" might be, only that when people perceive that they have been ripped off they get angry and are likely to express their anger. The phrase, to me, defines the moment when consequences of past actions begin to manifest.

 

[G-K-4]

I'd like to bring us back to the original post for a second.

Is this kind of vitriol and murderous fantasy exclusive to 9/11 CT culture or does it appear elsewhere?

Kevin Barrett called for the mass execution of the media in this country:

Does anyone have any other examples of this kind of rhetoric from Truther leaders? I ask for leader examples because that counts a lot more than dime-a-dozen anonymous internet bozoes.

And thank you, Brainster, for that example.

 

[sylvan8798]

This from an internet bozo, who admits to writing this to the CIA, etc. Pity the poor guys who have to read this crap on our tax dimes:

KHOD3: My plan that I wrote the CIA, CFR, etc. about is to have them DO SOMETHING besides kill Kennedy's etc. and provoke North Korea into launching missles to take out Hyundai. Kia, Toyota,Honda, (South Korea, Japan, China) and when their industry has been glassified we simply go in as the "good guys" and launch a few chioce nukes(already paid for) and we boom like the 1950's! Oldsmobiles! You see that piece of crap Hyundai crashed into the side of my Olds Delta 88 Royale and crumpled into scrap but it did crinkle the sheet metal on the Delta'a door! Launch the nukes! No, they'll never go for it as Rockefeller and his boys are globalists with huge investments in Asia so we're doomed. Perhaps when the dollar declines to an even level with the yuan or the oil runs out in the middle east? If I was younger I'd be over in the middle east as a soldier bott I guess as mine was the last mess-Vietnam-a total mess with Vietnam being used as a proxy to drain the Russian economy. "I didn't join the army because of lack of sense,but a lack of cents"-Cervantes-and he never made it back.