• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"We will kill 9/11 CT skeptics after 9/11 Truth comes out."

I picked up another "we will kill you after the revolution" death threat over at youtube.

Kilsryke, all you schills have schill-type names. If you think WTC7 collapse was an accident you are a frakking moron. If you work for an agency who pays you to pretend you think the above, you are still a frakking moron. Tell me enemy of mankind, what does it feel like to know you are now running scared motherfrakker? You think we wont get the databases of ALL the schills who worked for them? You think your not a dead man walking? (ed. - spelling/grammar unchanged, only swearwords changed)
Click to expand...

This was in response to me pointing out the true sixteen second collapse time for WTC7 and the fact that their magic explosives shattered steel but not windows.
 
JihadJane said:
What gives you the confidence to state that what you think I "obviously meant" is actually what I meant?

I didn't mean "general uprising" or anything remotely similar. You obviously take me for even more of an idiot than I thought .

:)
Click to expand...

Fact is that you did use the term and in the same breath expressed the thought of the general public getting angry.

Now GWB never actually said that Iraq was involved in the 911 attacks but he often spoke of both the evilness of Saddam and his regime and then also brought up the attacks.

Both of you seem to have put two barely connected thoughts together in a similar fashion.

One wonders of the significance of this?................
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
I picked up another "we will kill you after the revolution" death threat over at youtube.
Click to expand...

lol I found this post in the same thread, by the same guy:

You know John Barnett was here in this thread a few months ago. He is a jew I warn you. But I have his mobile number and you can ask him. Make sure you record the call.
Click to expand...

Question: why is the fact that someone is a Jew something he feels obligated to "warn you" about?



Just the way he writes it makes it sound really silly...like: I'M WARNING YOU DUDE! I WARN YOU! HE'S A JEW! YOU'D BEST BE WARNED!!!!
 
Last edited:
1337m4n said:
lol I found this post in the same thread, by the same guy:



Question: why is the fact that someone is a Jew something he feels obligated to "warn you" about?



Just the way he writes it makes it sound really silly...like: I'M WARNING YOU DUDE! I WARN YOU! HE'S A JEW! YOU'D BEST BE WARNED!!!!
Click to expand...

Duuuuude...don't you know?...all joooos are evil! In fact, one is waterboarding me right now.

It's ok...he's a NWO wanna-be...he won't get the secret password from me.
 
JimBenArm said:
So, what do you mean by the excrement hitting the rotary, bladed device? Hmm? Something good happening? People just going "Hm, that's a bit inconvenient"? You had something in mind when you said it. What was it, exactly?
Click to expand...

when i hear the **** is gonna hit the fan
its something major (esp when youre talking about angry americans)
so like he said what exactly did you mean then

youre so fast to jump on people yet you decline to explain your thoughts behind your statement in detail

(rough language)
 
http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/one+swallow+does+not+make+a+summer.html

Justin39640 said:
JimBenArm said:
So, what do you mean by the excrement hitting the rotary, bladed device? Hmm? Something good happening? People just going "Hm, that's a bit inconvenient"? You had something in mind when you said it. What was it, exactly?
Click to expand...

when i hear the **** is gonna hit the fan
its something major (esp when youre talking about angry americans)
so like he said what exactly did you mean then

youre so fast to jump on people yet you decline to explain your thoughts behind your statement in detail
Click to expand...



I assume this post is addressed to me and not JimBenArm. If so, your "jumping-on" perception is weirdly back-to-front. Foolmewunz did the jumping-on (and jumping to) , not me, presumably because he/she thought you could all have a good laugh at his/her favorite pet twoofer.

It is often observed that people come to resemble their pets.



Definition:

'When the unrandiesque word hits the fan':

"When the situation goes awry; when trouble starts."

http://dictionary.reference.com

A massive heist ("bail-out") has been pulled off at the expense of present and future taxpayers, on the pretext that, without it, the US economy would collapse. We are assured that the bail-outs , along with the economic stimulus plan, are working and that things are getting better. In the summer it is likely that dire economic indicators (e.g.: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/03/business/economy/03jobs.html?_r=1&th&emc=th **) will mean that it is no longer possible to hide the unpleasant truth - the US economy is still getting much worse. If/when that happens the 'Yes We Can" Obama administration will be in trouble. The feel-good facade would certainly be wearing very thin.

It says a lot for people here's faith in the great US democracy (or their political naivety) that the only possible expression of anger they can imagine to this situation is an immediate, general uprising. Dream on!

jaydeehess said:
Fact is that you did use the term and in the same breath expressed the thought of the general public getting angry.
Click to expand...

An angry US public equates to a general uprising?

It is often observed that people come to resemble their pets.



jaydeehess said:
If there are demonstrations in any way related to the economy then he/she gets to say "I told you so" whereas if there are none he/she gets to claim that he/she never actually predicted (came out and boldly stated it woulf happen)there would be.
Click to expand...

Do demonstrations equate to a "general uprising"?

I don’t do I-told-you-so.

1337m4n said:
Why do Truthers make statements that are deliberately vague and then act indignant whenever somebody (allegedly) misinterprets their words?


Truther: Are you gay?

Normal Guy: No, I have a girlfriend.

Truther: WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT I MEANT GAY AS IN "HAPPY" HOW DARE YOU PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH GRGRGAHRGAHGRHGARJKAGRAHJARHRAGGJ!GJ!!G!H!JH!!!!!
Click to expand...

My statement wasn’t vague. Real life is unpredictable.

So, as I said: “some doo doo may well become airborne and hit some fans” this summer.

which to all you over-excited guys 'n' girls means

Eeek! A general uprising!

Have fun with your hallucinations.

Thanks for reading this post. You may all now return to your comfortable, dependable, little, Good Guy/Bad Guy twoofer hobby world!

** “The numbers are indicative of a continued, very severe recession,” said Stuart G. Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services in Pittsburgh. “There’s nothing in here to show that the economy and the market are pulling out of the grip of recession.”
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
You may all now return to your comfortable, dependable, little, Good Guy/Bad Guy twoofer hobby world!
Click to expand...

Thanks. Just a quick reminder of how much disrespect truthers have for reality:

JihadJane said:
The poll doesn't say anything about these men being "angry". That is your add-on spin.
Click to expand...
Howardscripps.jpg
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
Thanks. Just a quick reminder of how much disrespect truthers have for reality:


[qimg]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/Howardscripps.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I have explained the hopelessly muddled thinking of your out-of-context, felt-tip meanderings in various places on this forum already.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
I have explained the hopelessly muddled thinking of your felt-tip meanderings in various places on this forum already.
Click to expand...

You've done nothing of the sort and you know it. All you did was dig yourself deeper into a hole. 'Uh, I meant uh, they're angry as people not angry at the government even though I asked if they had "hatred for the American Government." Uh yeah that's it.'

All you had to say was "thanks for showing that to me." Instead you exposed yourself as ignorant. If you're ingorant, don't come to a forum dedicated to exposing ignorance.
 
Last edited:
UNLoVedRebel said:
You've done nothing of the sort and you know it. All you did was dig yourself deeper into a hole. 'Uh, I meant uh, they're angry as people not angry at the government even though I asked if they had "hatred for the American Government." Uh yeah that's it.'

All you had to say was "thanks for showing that to me." Instead you exposed yourself as ignorant. If you're ingorant, don't come to a forum dedicated to exposing ignorance.
Click to expand...


Face the facts, UNLoVedRebel. Your journey into statistical pwoof of twoofer pathology was a complete disaster! Learn from your mistakes and let it go.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
Face the facts, UNLoVedRebel. Your journey into statistical "proof" of twoofer pathology was a complete disaster! Learn from your mistakes and let it go.
Click to expand...
Maybe you can explain why it's a disaster. Start with why your words and the poll say two completely different things.
JihadJane said:
The poll doesn't say anything about these men being "angry". That is your add-on spin.
Click to expand...
Howardscripps.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ok, so Focoist911 on youtube is racist, paranoid and stupid. Attempting to "debate" him is a waste of time.

So I decided to just frakk with his head:

If you REALLY think I'm an agent of some kind, then why are you talking back to me like this?

If I was an agent, all I'd have to do is make a phone call. Then a couple kilograms of coccaine mysteriously appear in your house right when the police show up with a search warrant and an "anonymous tip".

And then you'd go away for thirty years swearing that you were framed and no one believing you.

In fact... if I were an agent, I'd be making that call right now...
Click to expand...
 
JihadJane said:
Why are you wasting your time head frakking?
Click to expand...

Trying to educate you people is a waste of time. But if we frakk with your squishy heads for the purpose of amusement, and we successfully amuse ourselves, then the time is not wasted.
 
JihadJane said:
An angry US public equates to a general uprising?



Do demonstrations equate to a "general uprising"?

I don’t do I-told-you-so.
Click to expand...

Did you purposely misrepresent the content of my post?

I observed that when GWB and D.C. wanted to make people believe that Iraq was responsible for 911 BUT also wanted to make sure they could in fact deny having actually said such a thing they simply worded their speech such to mention both 911 and Iraq back to back.

In your case you opined on the possibility of the 'general' public (ie. not a small faction, not an identifiable group but a large cross section of USA society) and used a term usually reserved for truly bad actions.

I conclude that you A) actually were considering the possibility of general uprisings and wanted to be able to take credit for predicting them if they occured
AND
B) acknowledging the fact that you would be roundly thrummed should they not occur.
chose to use the same method that the past administration used.
Having been called on it now you are attempting to colour your statement and tell us that since life is unpredictable you were deliberately being vague (that is to say unspecific)
 
Wow. Jihad Jane has time to answer everyone else but me. Afraid to answer my questions? No wait of course you are because you can't answer me of when the prediction of the SHTF will happen.
 
JihadJane said:
What gives you the confidence to state that what you think I "obviously meant" is actually what I meant?
Click to expand...


Hey, I have an idea. How about if you say exactly what you mean, without metaphor, simile, or analogy? Just a few declarative sentences, in plain unvarnished English. You would be amazed how that sort of thing clears up these little communication problems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom