• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"We will kill 9/11 CT skeptics after 9/11 Truth comes out."

johnny karate said:
The executioner will be Bigfoot on the grassy knoll.
Click to expand...

I wondered if we'd get reimbursed for the trip to Dallas (grassy knoll), but they'll probably emulate the fine tradition of Iran, who charges the family of an executed traitor for the ammunition used, and my wife would get a bill for the cattle-car train ride south.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Do bright people have any evidence of their assertions, JihadJane? Or do they just spout nonsense and expect everyone to accept it?

I'm waiting for any evidence that the general uprisings come this summer, JihadJane.
Click to expand...


Ain't life great when you can just make up whatever rubbish you like and pretend I said it!
 
JihadJane said:
Ain't life great when you can just make up whatever rubbish you like and pretend I said it!
Click to expand...

I believe that you never said it. You almost never commit to a direct assertion of any kind. It's a tactic you have in common with most truthers.

Such intellectual cowardice is nothing to gloat about, in my opinion.
 
JihadJane said:
The US is still heading for a major economic crash. It remains to be seem whether the US public will become conscious enough to get angry about having been fleeced to the tune of trillions of dollars but some doo doo may well become airborne and hit some fans.

When? The economic indicators for this summer aren't too bright.
Click to expand...

I guess there's a time limit on JihadJane utterances, and one is allowed to deny saying something if it was more than 48 hours ago? I can think of no other reason that one would continue denying what is clearly there in print for everyone else to see.

Alternately, perhaps I was mistsaken and JihadJane never actually posted the above, although it clearly appears to be "Originally Posted by JihadJane".

I wonder how JihadJane would take that statement if made by, say, Dick Cheney, and then Dick Cheney tried to deny that he was predicting something big in the offing for, say, "this summer".

Methinks JihadJane would not buy that line of rhetoric for even a half-a-second.

Counting down to the JihadJane rhetorical foxtrot in .... 4... 3.... 2.... 1....
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Do you mean the Jo Cressy who within hours of Brainster pointing out to her the preponderance of Holocaust deniers among the twoofers crated a Holocaust-denying, "official" 9/11 story affirming sock puppet in the SLC comments section?

Do you mean the Jo Cressy who created a google account to impersonate Pat "Brainster" Curley and make it appear as though he turned twoofer resulting in Alex Jones's lap dog Paul Watson publicly humiliating himself when he declared Cressy's sock legit?

Do you mean the Jo Cressy who created yet another debunker sock puppet at google in order to post an graphic rape-torture-murder fantasy scenario targetting herself when she determined she wasn't getting enough attention at SLC?

Do you mean that Jo Cressy?
Click to expand...

No, this is the JihadJane who spouts Michael C Ruppert, claims that Brzezinski wrote a blueprint for American military involvement in Central Asia, and is able to summon Jamey Hecht (one of Ruppert's editors) on demand, and then shrinks from any honest debate on how Brzezinski's work The Grand Chessboard relates in any way to 9/11, or the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, or to anything else that's happened in the past dozen years.

(Source: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141524 )
 
Foolmewunz said:
I guess there's a time limit on JihadJane utterances, and one is allowed to deny saying something if it was more than 48 hours ago? I can think of no other reason that one would continue denying what is clearly there in print for everyone else to see.

Alternately, perhaps I was mistsaken and JihadJane never actually posted the above, although it clearly appears to be "Originally Posted by JihadJane".

I wonder how JihadJane would take that statement if made by, say, Dick Cheney, and then Dick Cheney tried to deny that he was predicting something big in the offing for, say, "this summer".

Methinks JihadJane would not buy that line of rhetoric for even a half-a-second.

Counting down to the JihadJane rhetorical foxtrot in .... 4... 3.... 2.... 1....
Click to expand...

:)

Perhaps you'd like to explain how "some doo doo may well become airborne and hit some fans" translates into "general uprisings".
 
Oooh, I shudda gone for the million.

"Here's only part of what I said so show me where does it say what you say I said - see you can't show me what you're claiming so I didn't say it and I'll keep this up until everyone's tired and drops off to beddy-bye because it's how I "win" arguments just denying forever that I actually meant what I obviously meant and no one can prove it as long as I keep dancing."





Funk, you may need this.....

 
Originally Posted by JihadJane
The US is still heading for a major economic crash. It remains to be seem whether the US public will become conscious enough to get angry about having been fleeced to the tune of trillions of dollars but some doo doo may well become airborne and hit some fans.

When? The economic indicators for this summer aren't too bright.
Click to expand...

JJ actually left him/herself an out by making this post a speculation.

Perhaps the US public will get angry and create some doo-doo-fan splatter?

If there are demonstrations in any way related to the economy then he/she gets to say "I told you so" whereas if there are none he/she gets to claim that he/she never actually predicted (came out and boldly stated it woulf happen)there would be.
 
jaydeehess said:
JJ actually left him/herself an out by making this post a speculation.

Perhaps the US public will get angry and create some doo-doo-fan splatter?

If there are demonstrations in any way related to the economy then he/she gets to say "I told you so" whereas if there are none he/she gets to claim that he/she never actually predicted (came out and boldly stated it woulf happen)there would be.
Click to expand...



Is JJ really Sylvia Browne?
 
Foolmewunz said:
Oooh, I shudda gone for the million.

"Here's only part of what I said so show me where does it say what you say I said - see you can't show me what you're claiming so I didn't say it and I'll keep this up until everyone's tired and drops off to beddy-bye because it's how I "win" arguments just denying forever that I actually meant what I obviously meant and no one can prove it as long as I keep dancing."





Funk, you may need this.....

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_110854a4c6fee319f6.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Perhaps you'd like to explain how "some doo doo may well become airborne and hit some fans" or the whole extract, translates into "general uprisings".
 
Last edited:
Foolmewunz said:
Oooh, I shudda gone for the million.

"Here's only part of what I said so show me where does it say what you say I said - see you can't show me what you're claiming so I didn't say it and I'll keep this up until everyone's tired and drops off to beddy-bye because it's how I "win" arguments just denying forever that I actually meant what I obviously meant and no one can prove it as long as I keep dancing."
Click to expand...

What gives you the confidence to state that what you think I "obviously meant" is actually what I meant?

I didn't mean "general uprising" or anything remotely similar. You obviously take me for even more of an idiot than I thought .

:)
 
You know, when someone here says "the **** is going to hit the fan" it generally means some big, negative reaction to the stimulus. So, to suddenly act like it's surprising that we would think you meant some general uprising from what you said is a bit, well, surprising. I think you posted it, knew what it meant, knew what kind of reaction you'd get from it, and then intended to act all surprised that we'd think you meant that.
Not that you're less than honest or anything...
 
JimBenArm said:
You know, when someone here says "the **** is going to hit the fan" it generally means some big, negative reaction to the stimulus. So, to suddenly act like it's surprising that we would think you meant some general uprising from what you said is a bit, well, surprising. I think you posted it, knew what it meant, knew what kind of reaction you'd get from it, and then intended to act all surprised that we'd think you meant that.
Not that you're less than honest or anything...
Click to expand...

Well, that looks like paranoid nonsense to me.


You also appear to take me for more of an idiot than I thought, if you think I'm idiotic enough to predict a general uprising in the USA this summer!

:boggled:
 
JihadJane said:
Well, that looks like paranoid nonsense to me.


You also appear to take me for more of an idiot than I thought, if you think I'm idiotic enough to predict a general uprising in the USA this summer!

:boggled:
Click to expand...
So, what do you mean by the excrement hitting the rotary, bladed device? Hmm? Something good happening? People just going "Hm, that's a bit inconvenient"? You had something in mind when you said it. What was it, exactly?
 
Why do Truthers make statements that are deliberately vague and then act indignant whenever somebody (allegedly) misinterprets their words?


Truther: Are you gay?

Normal Guy: No, I have a girlfriend.

Truther: WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT I MEANT GAY AS IN "HAPPY" HOW DARE YOU PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH GRGRGAHRGAHGRHGARJKAGRAHJARHRAGGJ!GJ!!G!H!JH!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom