Merko
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,899
So, you're changing the subject? It was almost ten years ago now that anyone considered changes in solar activity as a plausible explanation for global warming. Even before that theory was falsified, it couldn't explain the measured change in athmospheric CO2 levels.Please explain how we can control the sun and the orbit of the planet?
The orbit of the planet? I think you lost me on that one. But as I said: you'll happily accept any position, no matter how far-fetched or how scant the evidence, as long as it leads you to the conclusion you wanted in the first place.
It's called the teleological fallacy.



