29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition

[twinstead]

So you admit you are on the outside of the truth. Nice.

He means of course that unlike you he looks at both sides objectively, and is concerned about the image that the "truth movement" gets from people reading your threads on this forum. If I were a member of the "truth movement" I would be really pissed that you and others like you are making truthers look like idiots.

But you knew that.

 

[beachnut]

Sadly, you think that I think that I'm Galileo.

I think someone has been pulling your leg.

You are not the real Galileo who can't figure out 911 with help from JREF? Or just a troll who posts failed ideas on 911?

I am the reincarnation of Galileo Galilei, sent to haunt the JREF forum by God on high!

So you were telling a lie.

Go ahead. My first stundie nomination was in 1610 when I said I spotted the moons of Jupiter. ...

No? you really think you are Galileo. Oops.

I think you mean 29 to 130,000

Your ideas are failed on 911 and you are out numbered by engineers by thousands.

 

[Toke]

I wonder why nobody have started a "Project Steve" on truthers?
Not.

 

[lightfire22000]

By most standards for evaluating evidence, you probably could find a couple of reasonably parsimonious pieces of evidence for saying that the world is 10,000 years old(I couldn't confidently but someone else probably could). However, you could also find millions of other pieces of evidence to suggest the contrary.

 

[tfk]

One trait of a lunatic is that they are always right.

.
One trait of an engineer is that we always TRY to be right.

One occupational hazard is that a completely unreasonable percent of us think that we always are.

tom

PS. BOTH traits piss off our POSSLQs to no end...

 

[dudalb]

Agreed, and I like Randi and find her fact-based for many things. For most things, she posted links to authoritative material. I used to turn off the radio when she went into that rant.

I believe we all have blind spots and I wonder what mine are.

Once has to ask if Rhodes really belivied that crap or if she was just throwing anything at all negative about the Bush Administration at the wall to see if it would stick. Either way, it badly damaged her creditbility.

 

[dudalb]

Did I miss something?

He was suspended for three days along with a number of other people after a blow up in Politics about six weeks ago, and, although the suspension is over, he has not been around since. He has NOT been banned. That's all I can tell you.
I guess he decided to take a break for a while.

 

[Holler Hoojer]

29? Why didn't you say so? I'd have never said a word against CT if I had known about the crushing consensus. And such notables, too.

 

[FineWine]

What do you expect when some conspiracy kook won't leave you alone.

Well, if you were to call, they would hang up quickly.

 

[FineWine]

Oh course I remember him!

You don't remember the conversation, however, as it was conducted in Italian.

 

[FineWine]

Sadly, you think that I think that I'm Galileo.

I think someone has been pulling your leg.

The biggest problem--an insurmountable one, actually--for your delusion is that the real Galileo was smart.

 

[dropzone]

Amazingly (or not-so-amazingly), she didn't care. She asked me why it mattered to me, considering that I didn't even live in Fresno (!).

[confused but open] So what you are saying is that she's crazy, but she puts out?

 

[Blender Head]

The best thing about this thread are TAM's list, and Galileo's cognitive dissonance in proclaiming that the amount of scientists 'voting' one way or another doesn't matter, when a few pages earlier he stated the opposite.

 

[Bluesky]

The station checked out Gage's credentials before bringing him on the show. The person you spoke with is well aware that Gage is not a crank, even if not absolutely convinced he is 100% correct.

When some rambling crank calls in claiming to be an expert, they just roll their eyes. Local TV people can spot fraud.

I dont see a problem with people interviewing Gage. They just need to do a bit of research and ask him some proper questions. If they did some research or thought about what he is saying and doing, then they would clearly see him as a fraud. Gage is much more of a calculating fraudster than a rambling crank.

I have always hoped that ae91truth would publish his scheduled tv appearances so that we could get some questions to the interviewers. But the ae911truth seem to prefer to wait until after they have taped the interview, before they announce them.... funny that?

Some of the questions in thread Richard Gage Q&A would be good, as would hundreds of others in the forum

 

[Heiwa]

Could someone please post links to the engineering papers that any of these 29 have created.

Thanks.

My latest will come in ASCE JEM soon. The others you know where to find. Don't worry.

 

[twinstead]

My latest will come in ASCE JEM soon. The others you know where to find. Don't worry.

Be sure to let us know when the ASCE carries your paper.

 

[Seymour Butz]

Be sure to let us know when the ASCE carries your paper.

.... to the outhouse to be used as asswipe.

 

[Galileo]

The biggest problem--an insurmountable one, actually--for your delusion is that the real Galileo was smart.

One thing hasn't changed in 400 years, Galileo's critics are still stupid.

 

[NWO Sentryman]

One thing hasn't changed in 400 years, Galileo's critics are still stupid.

And Alex Jones got a stundie for comparing himself to Galileo.

The Church also acknowledged that Galileo spoke the truth.

Everyone here believes earth orbits the sun.

 

[Galileo]

And Alex Jones got a stundie for comparing himself to Galileo.

The Church also acknowledged that Galileo spoke the truth.

Everyone here believes earth orbits the sun.

Do you really think the NWO is a real organization, or did your mom give you that name?