Like this lie? You are saying the top turned to dust, nearly all of it, but you don't present evidence, or say what did it.
Your numbered argument style fallacies aren't working and falling flat Steve-0. Because That's exactly what you implied . No exaggeration needed.I can certainly understand why your irony meter exploded, that whole paragraph you wrote is just so ironic it could not survive it.Originally Posted by A W Smith
For shame Steve-0. so people who ignore the demise of a steel, glass and concrete edifice known as building seven are moral cowards? Not satisfied that your poisoning of the well had any effect on observers on the sidelines you move to Ad Hominem logical fallacies? Are your more compassionate to building materials than the dead? You want to talk about moral cowards Steve-0? My Irony meter exploded.That is a combination of ...Originally Posted by A W Smith
For shame Steve-0. so people who ignore the demise of a steel, glass and concrete edifice known as building seven are moral cowards?
1 Carry your opponent’s proposition beyond its natural limits; exaggerate it.
and
2 Use different meanings of your opponent’s words to refute his argument.
and
3 Ignore your opponent’s proposition, which was intended to refer to some particular thing.
Your words Steve-0, Not mine.It's perfectly clear to us what you are saying. Trying to paste some sort of band aid on it with "debate" points which are non sequitur to begin with wont make your wound go away.poisoning the well? LOL that's rich coming from a JREF "debunker", I think your irony meter would have hit the moon from that comment alone. So I am poisoning the well by stating ...Originally Posted by A W Smith
Not satisfied that your poisoning of the well had any effect on observers on the sidelines you move to Ad Hominem logical fallacies? Are your more compassionate to building materials than the dead? You want to talk about moral cowards Steve-0? My Irony meter exploded.
Quote:
A plausible excuse to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all? This pat little response is a perfect example of what the Mike Rivero quote was talking about, about ...
"...most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."
So just throw up any answer at all and most people will use that as an excuse to not think for themselves.
yes Steve-0, we know that. as explained by me above.
You said it yourself Steve-0, People who state reasons why few recall the events of building 7 are making excuses for "moral cowards". This means you are more attached to building seven than to other 9/11 sites that actually had human victims. I'm not exaggerating anything. it is perfectly clear to us what you are saying.So now you are accusing me of being an inhuman monster with no feelings? No that is not an exageration of what you are saying, if you are trying to imply I care more for buildings than the dead that is exactly what you are saying. Can you say ...38 Become personal, insulting and rude as soon as you perceive that your opponent has the upper handOriginally Posted by A W Smith
Are your more compassionate to building materials than the dead?
Appeal to emotion much Steve-0? why would I argue over at an obscure BBC blog site when I'm a US citizen? JREF is hosted in the US.
You came here Steve-0, We are not duty bound nor obligated to follow you all over the net. Like i said in a post earlier that you completely ignored. Take your moderation issues up in the Forum Management section. And don't be such a Whiner.
