So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

[ULTIMA1]

Actually it would have caused less damage that way. I'll let you figure out why if you can.

Please explain how letting a building fall to the side would cause less damage then bringing it straight down?

 

[Pardalis]

They brought down a building on fire and was unstable to keep it from causing any more damage and more fires that the firemen could not fight. As supported by Chief Haydens statements.

In this case, human life is trumps property damage, and the chief's responsibility is to avoid loss of life.

 

[stateofgrace]

They brought down a building on fire and was unstable to keep it from causing any more damage and more fires that the firemen could not fight. As supported by Chief Haydens statements.

You are accusing the FDNY of a 911 cover up?

 

[A W Smith]

Please explain how letting a building fall to the side would cause less damage then bringing it straight down?

name one building that fell on its side on 9/11

 

[DGM]

Please explain how letting a building fall to the side would cause less damage then bringing it straight down?

It didn't come straight down. Here's a question for you, What buildings did WTC7 destroy?

 

[ULTIMA1]

no he didn't. they were not that far along. IF the building didn't come down on its own. which everyone expected. then it would have to be taken down.

http://researchris.blogspot.com/2008/12/fdny-lieutenant-admitted-plan-to-take.html
it was best for it to come down on its own or it would be taken down,

Though Rastuccio expresses his opinion that the building had collapsed without the aid of explosives, he admits that a plan had been in place to deliberately demolish the structure.

 

[Pardalis]

it was best for it to come down on its own or it would be taken down,

Eventually.

Though Rastuccio expresses his opinion that the building had collapsed without the aid of explosives, he admits that a plan had been in place to deliberately demolish the structure.

That's what the author of the article implies, which is not what Rastuccio said at all.

Boy you guys are pathetic, you latch on to any words anyone has ever said, like trying to nail jello to a wall and hope it'll stick

 

[A W Smith]

http://researchris.blogspot.com/2008/12/fdny-lieutenant-admitted-plan-to-take.html
it was best for it to come down on its own or it would be taken down,

Though Rastuccio expresses his opinion that the building had collapsed without the aid of explosives, he admits that a plan had been in place to deliberately demolish the structure.

he mentions nothing about a "plan". All he says is it would have to be taken down. Just like they did with the Deutsche Bank building

 

[FineWine]

So fun and easy to prove you wrong with facts.

http://researchris.blogspot.com/2008/12/fdny-lieutenant-admitted-plan-to-take.html
FDNY lieutenant David Rastuccio in an interview with MSNBC stated there was a plan to bring down buidling 7.

So fun and easy to recycle debunked nonsense from Prisonplanet:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131330

 

[ULTIMA1]

he mentions nothing about a "plan". All he says is it would have to be taken down. Just like they did with the Deutsche Bank building

Eventually.

But fire chiefs can bring down a building in a emergency and this supports that fact.

 

[stateofgrace]

ULTIMA1,what time was the call made?

You said

But i have posted evidence that the firemen were out of the building BEFORE the call.

What time was the call made?

 

[Pardalis]

But fire chiefs can bring down a building in a emergency and this supports that fact.

So why cover it up if it's standard procedure?

 

[ULTIMA1]

What time was the call made?

After the firemen were out of the building.

 

[stateofgrace]

But fire chiefs can bring down a building in a emergency and this supports that fact.

You are suggesting the FDNY brought down WTC 7 and then covering it up?

 

[ULTIMA1]

So why cover it up if it's standard procedure?

Why don't you ask the fire commander or fire chiefs ?

 

[stateofgrace]

After the firemen were out of the building.

And the time of this call was when then ?

 

[Pardalis]

Why don't you ask the fire commander or fire chiefs ?

I'm not the one purporting that stupid theory of yours.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You are suggesting the FDNY brought down WTC 7 and then covering it up.

NO, i am stating the fire commander or fire chief can order a building brought down in an emergecny.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I'm not the one purporting that stupid theory of yours.

Well if i post the information you will just ignore it, if you find out yourself then you have to accept the facts.

 

[stateofgrace]

NO, i am stating the fire commander or fire chief can order a building brought down in an emergecny.

So this as what to do with WTC 7, then ?