So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

ULTIMA1 said:
Becasue you will just be your normal immature self and ignore what i post.
Click to expand...

Given that absolutely everything that you post is complete nonsense, it is a fair assumption that people will dismiss what you say.
 
facts? what facts?

You havent posted any evidence that pulling a 40+ story building has, or even CAN be done in that amount of time.

One would think an NSA analyst would at least post his evidence. We all know better.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The facts speak for themselves, unless your trying to say the fire chiefs are lying.
Click to expand...

Ultima, the link you posted shows the only emergency was to make everybody get out of there.

Your contention that there was an emergency to take down the building is simply not supported by the quotes you gave from chief Hayden.

ULTIMA1 said:
Becasue you will just be your normal immature self and ignore what i post
Click to expand...

No, I looked at what you gave me honestly, and simply couldn't find anything that you said in it.
 
Gavron said:
facts? what facts?
Click to expand...

The facts that fire chiefs state that the firemen were out of the building before the phone call.


Chief Nigro pulled the firemen before talking to anyone that means before talking to the fire commader who was talking to Silverstein.
 
but you cant show that "pulling" a 40+ story building is even possible.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thank you.
 
How can it be a fact, when you cannot show that it has even been done to a building that size?:big:

this is too laughable to believe.
 
Gavron said:
but you cant show that "pulling" a 40+ story building is even possible.
Click to expand...

As stated before, and goning by common sense and basic intelligence.

It would not be hard to pull a building that was already severaly damaged.
 
ULTIMA, in your years of being an Internet troll, do you think that you have ever convinced anybody of anything? Well, besides the fact that you are not an NSA intelligence analyst.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
As stated before, and goning by common sense and basic intelligence.

It would not be hard to pull a building that was already severaly damaged.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't it be equally intelligent to conclude that a building so badly damaged could also collapse on its own?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
As stated before, and goning by common sense and basic intelligence.

It would not be hard to pull a building that was already severaly damaged.
Click to expand...

...and yet you cannot post any evidence of it being done before, on a building that size?

yeah....not that hard. :big:

ULTIMA1 said:
So you are saying the fire chiefs are lying, ok.
Click to expand...

No, we are saying you are lying.
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
Wouldn't it be equally intelligent to conclude that a building so badly damaged could also collapse on its own?
Click to expand...

You did not read Chief Haydens statement, if you did you would have seen the following. They were worried about fire spreading.

Also common sense and basic intelligence states that if the building would have collapsed on its own it would have collapsed to the side that was damaged. Also casuing more damage to other buidlings and spreading fires.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
In this case pull it means the building becasue as per the fire chiefs the firemen were already out of the building when the call was made to Silverstein.
Click to expand...

In the Hayden quotes you gave me, "to pull" clearly is used to refer to the firefighters.

You would need to show evidence how this new usage you are suggesting was employed.

Also, you still need to show me what was the emergency to take down the building.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom