JC, I know you won't appreciate this much, but I vividly remember a time in the past where
you weren't so sure of exactly what it was you saw. And I don't mean your general description of the incident has changed really, just that you were at one time more open to the notion you could have simply 'misidentified' something. Going so far as to utter the words (essentially these words - as I remember them in my mind at least) "
Harry, I don't know what I saw, but it did scare the snot out of me. I was 17, up in a tree blind and I didn't even want to be there in the first place. I was coerced to go along on that hunting trip cause I'm not even a hunter." Is that even close to anything you remember saying 'back when'? As a caveat, much of that particular discussion was in a 'Saturday night chat room' situation, so a record probably doesn't exist, but I think you already know I 'like you' and there's nothing genuine to be gained on any of our parts by my 'making it all up'.
Is it simply a case of you being more sure now, based on others' descriptions etc.? I'm asking because it's an important distinction IMO. At one time, it could have been deduced, by your own words, that what you saw was possibly ANOTHER HUNTER IN A GHILLIE SUIT, for example, but now you're 90% (?) sure it was a Bigfoot? Are you sure sure?