Were is your evidence that this was done in order to seize peoples guns? All you provide is a list of items relating to a suspected murderer. Nothing you list is evidence of a conspiracy to take guns or increase the number of abortions performed.
Well things are a little early in the prosecution process and I am sure there will be evidence presented in court. Jumping the gun on this point when you are not in anyway directly related to the case is a little silly. Police don't often release all of their evidence to the general public as it could harm the prosecutions case.
In any case how about two witnesses that he assaulted?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090602/ap_on_re_us/us_abortion_shooting_suspect
If this is a conspiracy I am guessing the whole church is in on it?
He was arrested 3 hours after the shooting near Gardner apx 170 miles away. Gardner is a straight shot from Wichita up I35. The speed limit on I35 is 70 mph. Assuming he did not speed he could have traveled up to 210 miles. The first thing most killers do is try and run. He was heading towards Kansas City which is his last know address. There is nothing odd about this at all.
I have not seen anyone link him to anti-abortion groups. I have seen him linked to anti government groups which no one is denying.
He has also never been a member, volunteer, or contributor to Green Peace. So what? This is completely irrelevant information.
Once again this is irrelevant. My mother is one of the kindest people on the planet but I have seen her threaten to kill people caught hunting on our land.
Can you quote a source for this? He has been linked to violent anti government groups so perhaps his violent past is merely undocumented?
Completely irrelevant.
Ummmm... other pro-life activists have killed abortion doctors. In fact this group you to keep a hit list.
http://www.christiangallery.com/
Until you can conclusively prove Lee Harvey was a scapegoat you should leave him out of the discussion. Who is calling Roeder a "lone nut?"
Every source I can find talks about his conviction AND the fact that it was thrown out. Can you show me one that does not mention that it was thrown out?
Irrelevant.
How do you know she is either vindictive or disgruntled? She is not a witness or even an accuser. The media is talking to people who know him, is that really evidence of a conspiracy?
False, he shot Tiller in a church and assaulted two people that tried to stop him.
False.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/31/abortion-doctor-george-tiller-killed
Most killers don't think these things through and other political activists have killed abortion doctors.
What? Completely false assumptions and logic here. If someone is crazy then they have to talk to the media? If they don't talk to the media then they can't be crazy? Temporary insanity is a possibility and a legal defense.
What's the other side? Perhaps Roeder's attorney is advising him not to talk. Perhaps he is feeling ashamed and doesn't want to talk. There are many reasons he wouldn't be giving interviews but this is not evidence of a conspiracy.
Where is yours?
They are also irrelevant and would not support your theory anyway.
Your point is...?
Wouldn't the exact opposite of being in favor of murdering people actually be being against murdering people? Again, how is this evidence?
You need to prove that the "authorities" are controlling the media. You also need to tell us who the authorities are.
Evidence has been found and presented as I detailed above. More will come out in a trial, which Roeder will be given.
Yes, he is innocent until proven guilty, and nothing will change that.
