Was Tiller's Murder a Staged, State-Sponsored Terror Attack?
There's a good chance that this shooting was done by an agent provocateur, in an attempt to advance the pro-abortion and anti-gun movement.
Were is your evidence that this was done in order to seize peoples guns? All you provide is a list of items relating to a suspected murderer. Nothing you list is evidence of a conspiracy to take guns or increase the number of abortions performed.
* No evidence has been presented that Roeder did the shooting.
Well things are a little early in the prosecution process and I am sure there will be evidence presented in court. Jumping the gun on this point when you are not in anyway directly related to the case is a little silly. Police don't often release all of their evidence to the general public as it could harm the prosecutions case.
In any case how about two witnesses that he assaulted?
Roeder is accused of shooting Tiller to death Sunday at the doctor's Lutheran church in Wichita as he was serving as an usher. Roeder also was charged with aggravated assault for allegedly threatening two people who tried to stop him.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090602/ap_on_re_us/us_abortion_shooting_suspect
If this is a conspiracy I am guessing the whole church is in on it?
* Roeder was 170 miles away when arrested.
He was arrested 3 hours after the shooting near Gardner apx 170 miles away. Gardner is a straight shot from Wichita up I35. The speed limit on I35 is 70 mph. Assuming he did not speed he could have traveled up to 210 miles. The first thing most killers do is try and run. He was heading towards Kansas City which is his last know address. There is nothing odd about this at all.
* The police are continually telling us that Roeder is linked to militant anti-abortion groups, but at the same time tell us he acted alone, before the investigation has even started.
I have not seen anyone link him to anti-abortion groups. I have seen him linked to anti government groups which no one is denying.
* Roeder has never been a member, volunteer or contributor to Operation Rescue.
He has also never been a member, volunteer, or contributor to Green Peace. So what? This is completely irrelevant information.
* Roeder posted some comments on the Operation Rescue forum that are peaceful in nature.
Once again this is irrelevant. My mother is one of the kindest people on the planet but I have seen her threaten to kill people caught hunting on our land.
* Roeder has no history of violence. Criminologists can tell you that it is very rare for non-violent people to suddenly become violent after the age of 50.
Can you quote a source for this? He has been linked to violent anti government groups so perhaps his violent past is merely undocumented?
* Roeder opposed abortion, which is his right to believe.
Completely irrelevant.
* Roeder was pro-life, which contradicts the notion that he would kill someone.
Ummmm... other pro-life activists have killed abortion doctors. In fact this group you to keep a hit list.
http://www.christiangallery.com/
* Roeder is being called a "lone nut", just like Lee Harvey Oswald and many other scapegoats of history.
Until you can conclusively prove Lee Harvey was a scapegoat you should leave him out of the discussion. Who is calling Roeder a "lone nut?"
* They keep telling us Roeder has a criminal record, even though the appeals court threw out his conviction because of government misconduct.
Every source I can find talks about his conviction AND the fact that it was thrown out. Can you show me one that does not mention that it was thrown out?
* The crime Roeder was accused of did not involve any initiation of force against another person, it was a regulatory technicality.
Irrelevant.
* Roeder's vindictive & disgruntled ex-wife is being quoted in the news.
How do you know she is either vindictive or disgruntled? She is not a witness or even an accuser. The media is talking to people who know him, is that really evidence of a conspiracy?
* No eyewitnesses saw Roeder at the crime scene.
False, he shot Tiller in a church and assaulted two people that tried to stop him.
* They did not get the license plate of the vehicle that left the scene, which makes his arrest suspicious and the ID of him unreliable.
False.
According to the reports a white man carrying a handgun shot the doctor and then fled in a blue Ford Taurus.
"It's an unfortunate incident to happen on a Sunday morning," Wichita police captain Brent Allred told reporters. "These things should not occur at any time."
The FBI and state police were called in to help search for the gunman, whose licence plate was registered to a home in a suburb of Kansas City, 200 miles away.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/31/abortion-doctor-george-tiller-killed
* Roeder is a political activist. Shooting an abortion doctor does not benefit his cause, it benefits the cause of his political opponents.
Most killers don't think these things through and other political activists have killed abortion doctors.
* If Roeder is really crazy, why has he not spoken to the media? If Roeder is not crazy, then this entire case makes no sense at all.
What? Completely false assumptions and logic here. If someone is crazy then they have to talk to the media? If they don't talk to the media then they can't be crazy? Temporary insanity is a possibility and a legal defense.
* Roeder is a political activist who has the nation's attention. Why has he not talked to the media? Why does the news only report one side of the story?
What's the other side? Perhaps Roeder's attorney is advising him not to talk. Perhaps he is feeling ashamed and doesn't want to talk. There are many reasons he wouldn't be giving interviews but this is not evidence of a conspiracy.
* Where is the smoking gun?
Where is yours?
Not all pro-life people support the death penalty. What Roeder's views on the death penalty are, is unknown.
They are also irrelevant and would not support your theory anyway.
Also, most people who favor the death penalty favor it only for murder, usually first degree murder.
Your point is...?
Being in favor of the death penalty for murder is the exact opposite of being in favor of murdering people, which is what someone did to Tiller.
Wouldn't the exact opposite of being in favor of murdering people actually be being against murdering people? Again, how is this evidence?
It is obvious from the media coverage that the "authorities" are attempting to convict Roeder in the media. Usually when this is done, they trumpet the strongest evidence. In this case, no real evidence has been trumpeted, possibly because the evidence has not been manufactured yet.
Roeder is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
You need to prove that the "authorities" are controlling the media. You also need to tell us who the authorities are.
Evidence has been found and presented as I detailed above. More will come out in a trial, which Roeder will be given.
Yes, he is innocent until proven guilty, and nothing will change that.