Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
Is there a rush to expose the inside job of 9/11 ?

...**
Click to expand...
Your posts are lies of lies. Good for you a rush. Let me guess a rush in truther-ville is 7 years, 8 months, and 24 days. What a rush.

You and Gage are experts at posting moronic delusions about 911; if you rush any faster it could be 100 years before you figure out 911. How pathetic it takes Gage 4,065,120 minutes to mess up 911 beyond all recognition and the Passengers of Flight 93, heroes you spit on, figured out 911 in 21 minutes and took action to stop terrorists. Gage took 203,256 times longer than the heroes on Flight 93 to make up lies and become a terrorist loyalist spreading lies about the United States all over the world so he can travel and tell lies. You support evil in the form of stupidity, Gage. Yes I think of your anti-intellectual pursuit of stupid ideas on 911 as evil; ignorance to me is evil and you and Gage are the personification of stupid ideas on 911.

Gage stands up and lies about our country and you support him; you and Gage are just like what you are against; liars. You lie because you lack knowledge and can't figure out 911 in over 4 million minutes, the Passengers of Flight 93 you spit on figured out 911 in 21 minutes. You failed with 200,000 times more time to figure out 911. You chose to apologize for terrorists with lies.
 
At the present rate of growth, it will take the truth movement, let me see....4,545 years to reach 10.1% of the USA population.

I be sure to leave a video for my great, great, great, great, great......grandchildren.

TAM:)
 
BigAl said:
That 2 minute video demonstrates nothing of what you claim.

Bill; How do you know any Architects and Engineers were in attendance anywhere?

If any attended, how do you know that any were "enlightened"?
Click to expand...

Spain- Tele 5 Mainstream broadcast about Richard Gage's conference with english subtitles:

Thanks to the conference by Richard Gage, AIA here in Madrid's Colegio Oficial de Arquitectura, on Nov 7, th, this is the first time that 911 truth has been shown on mainstream media here in Spain. The conference was packed and the Colegio, which is the oficial "Guild" for architects here in Spain has requested several copies of the video conference. This is the recording of the news item shown at midday on the 8th of November which was seen nation wide, with english
subtitles.
'****' he oficial "Guild" for architects here in Spain has requested several copies of the video conference ''
 
PB2007 said:
No, of course not. How long do you want? Another 8 years? Why not make it 10, 20, or 30... I mean, it's not like the people you're after will go anywhere is it?
Click to expand...

Not US you silly boy. Somebody in the MEDIA is trying to open it up. And maybe they are being pushed from, you know....higher up...if you know what I mean.
 
bill smith said:
Spain- Tele 5 Mainstream broadcast about Richard Gage's conference with english subtitles:

Thanks to the conference by Richard Gage, AIA here in Madrid's Colegio Oficial de Arquitectura, on Nov 7, th, this is the first time that 911 truth has been shown on mainstream media here in Spain. The conference was packed and the Colegio, which is the oficial "Guild" for architects here in Spain has requested several copies of the video conference. This is the recording of the news item shown at midday on the 8th of November which was seen nation wide, with english
subtitles.
'****' he oficial "Guild" for architects here in Spain has requested several copies of the video conference ''
Click to expand...
Gage is a liar! He is now seen as a liar in Spain. He apologizes for terrorists like you do; poorly


You support Gage because you don't understand 911. So you support a liar; this is not news
 
Last edited:
This is all I need to see from the idiot Richard Gage:

13639486f5dd1c4c81.jpg
 
bill smith said:
Yeah....we're almost gone.
Click to expand...
As long as there is ignorance on 911 your anti-intellectual brothers and sisters will spew lies about 911.

There will always be people who are ignorant on 911. They will talk about lies and post failed moronic delusions as their dumbed-down version of 911.

Gage is a capitalist (or an insane nut case) who has no morals and loves to travel spewing lies about 911; his is either dumber than a bucket of dirt or a smart snake-oil salesman living off his lies due to the stupidity of his donors.

Where is you video of the impact with no wing marks? Hiding from your lie and other delusions on 911?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Yeah....we're almost gone.
Click to expand...

Dodge much?

You claim that Gage had a large audience and "Lots of Architects and Engineers attended the lectures and were enlightened."

bill smith said:
TV is a wonderful thing if it is on your side. Gage went down very well in Europe where he had a fairly large attentive audience everywhere he went. Lots of Architects and Engineers attended the lectures and were enlightened.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5652298545742902173&hl=es Mainstream News
Click to expand...

I want to know what you saw that lets you say that. That video has no such information.
 
stateofgrace said:
It does read that way doesn't it? And Bill apparently did read it that way.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138715&page=28

Wonder how many other troofers will read it that way ?
Click to expand...
.
Typically, bill had no clue what was going on until it was spoon fed to him here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4777076#post4777076

Based on his comments on the Heiwa Challenge thread, Bill also believes that

1. Discussion comments get the same review as the original papers themselves.

2. Discussion comments are peer-reviewed, and

3. that the fact that ASCE publishes a comment means that they agree with it.

The basis for his beliefs becomes clear when one realizes that it is built upon his personal experience with publishing technical papers in technical journals.

Which is ___ ?

Bill? Care to fill in the blank for us.

tom
 
tfk said:
.
Typically, bill had no clue what was going on until it was spoon fed to him here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4777076#post4777076

Based on his comments on the Heiwa Challenge thread, Bill also believes that

1. Discussion comments get the same review as the original papers themselves.

2. Discussion comments are peer-reviewed, and

3. that the fact that ASCE publishes a comment means that they agree with it.

The basis for his beliefs becomes clear when one realizes that it is built upon his personal experience with publishing technical papers in technical journals.

Which is ___ ?

Bill? Care to fill in the blank for us.

tom
Click to expand...

Zero T..the same as yourself. One nice thing about the discussion paper is that when it is published it has been peer reviewed as a technically valid point of view.. Beautifully, a rebuttal by the challenged party will be expected of course and I'm absolutely positive that ole Bazant is revelling in the thoughts of these by-now very interested and focussed engineers going over his answer with a fine tooth comb. So he better make it good....eh T ?

Now we wil see if a silk purse can really be made out of a sow's ear.
 
Last edited:
A lie every forty minutes from B S

bill smith said:
Zero T..the same as yourself. One nice thing about the discussion paper is that when it is published it has been peer reviewed as a technically valid point of view.. Beautifully, a rebuttal by the challenged party will be expected of course and I'm absolutely positive that ole Bazant is revelling in the thoughts of these by-now very interested and focussed engineers going over his answer with a fine tooth comb. So he better make it good....eh T ?
Click to expand...

peer reviewed by whom?
 
Bill, did you completely miss R. Mackey's post in the challenged Heiwa thread? The discussions are not peer-reviewed in any way, and that they are accepted for publication doesn't mean that they have any merit at all. This is like an engineer's version of a 'letter to the editor' - but it's one where the author, or others, have the ability to respond to the criticism, and it's actually encouraged. Hence the term 'discussion'.

A previous discussion of one of Bazant's papers in that same journal was provided as an example. Hilariously, it features an idiot truther trying to make bold assertions in a field he clearly hasn't any expertise in. Bazant makes the comment that the guy should consider picking up a structural mechanics textbook before writing to a structural mechanics journal in the future.

Very funny stuff, you should take a look at it and become as familiar with it as possible, as I have a suspicion that history is about to repeat itself. You can be the most prepared truther out there.
 
With all the chest-thumping bs is doing about the expansion and acceptance of the Truth Movement, one would expect them to break big into the mainstream any day now.

So how about it, bs? When do you predict the rest of the dominoes will fall, and we'll be reading in the newspaper about new investigations, federal indictments, etc?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Zero T..the same as yourself.
Click to expand...

Are you "absolutely positive" about this, bill?

And you know this how?
You've never asked me this.
You don't know who I am.
Yet you know that I have no published papers?

You'd also be wrong.

bill smith said:
One nice thing about the discussion paper is that when it is published it has been peer reviewed as a technically valid point of view..
Click to expand...

Are you "absolutely positive" about this, bill?
JOM clearly disagrees.

bill smith said:
Beautifully, a rebuttal by the challenged party will be expected of course
Click to expand...

Expected by whom.

Who is it - exactly - that you think that you speak for?

bill smith said:
and I'm absolutely positive that
Click to expand...

And we've all seen how reliable THAT is ...

bill smith said:
ole Bazant is revelling in the thoughts of these by-now very interested and focussed engineers going over his answer with a fine tooth comb. So he better make it good....eh T ?
Click to expand...

Real engineers aren't "interested". Or "focussed" (sic). For real engineers, this question was answered years ago.

Heiwa (HAH!), Tony Sz (I don't know Tony well enough to mock him. He may be an ernest person who is simply & completely wrong) and you (HAHAHA!!) have the ability to go over Bazant's "answer" right now. His answer lies in his original work.

Feel free to get you your comb, and see if it has ANY teeth left in it. Give me your assessment of exactly what you feel that he got wrong. Oh, the heck with it. What am I thinking...

You say the cutest things, you little munchkin... :D

tom
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom