Galileo
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 3,368
Was Tiller's Murder a Staged, State-Sponsored Terror Attack?
There's a good chance that this shooting was done by an agent provocateur, in an attempt to advance the pro-abortion and anti-gun movement.
* No evidence has been presented that Roeder did the shooting.
* Roeder was 170 miles away when arrested.
* The police are continually telling us that Roeder is linked to militant anti-abortion groups, but at the same time tell us he acted alone, before the investigation has even started.
* Roeder has never been a member, volunteer or contributor to Operation Rescue.
* Roeder posted some comments on the Operation Rescue forum that are peaceful in nature.
* Roeder has no history of violence. Criminologists can tell you that it is very rare for non-violent people to suddenly become violent after the age of 50.
* Roeder opposed abortion, which is his right to believe.
* Roeder was pro-life, which contradicts the notion that he would kill someone.
* Roeder is being called a "lone nut", just like Lee Harvey Oswald and many other scapegoats of history.
* They keep telling us Roeder has a criminal record, even though the appeals court threw out his conviction because of government misconduct.
* The crime Roeder was accused of did not involve any initiation of force against another person, it was a regulatory technicality.
* Roeder's vindictive & disgruntled ex-wife is being quoted in the news.
* No eyewitnesses saw Roeder at the crime scene.
* They did not get the license plate of the vehicle that left the scene, which makes his arrest suspicious and the ID of him unreliable.
* Roeder is a political activist. Shooting an abortion doctor does not benefit his cause, it benefits the cause of his political opponents.
* If Roeder is really crazy, why has he not spoken to the media? If Roeder is not crazy, then this entire case makes no sense at all.
* Roeder is a political activist who has the nation's attention. Why has he not talked to the media? Why does the news only report one side of the story?
* Where is the smoking gun?
Not all pro-life people support the death penalty. What Roeder's views on the death penalty are, is unknown.
Also, most people who favor the death penalty favor it only for murder, usually first degree murder.
Being in favor of the death penalty for murder is the exact opposite of being in favor of murdering people, which is what someone did to Tiller.
It is obvious from the media coverage that the "authorities" are attempting to convict Roeder in the media. Usually when this is done, they trumpet the strongest evidence. In this case, no real evidence has been trumpeted, possibly because the evidence has not been manufactured yet.
Roeder is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
....
Beware 'Lone Nut' Theory in Tiller's Murder
....
Beware the 'Lone Nut' Theory
....
http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/4030/context/archive
There's a good chance that this shooting was done by an agent provocateur, in an attempt to advance the pro-abortion and anti-gun movement.
* No evidence has been presented that Roeder did the shooting.
* Roeder was 170 miles away when arrested.
* The police are continually telling us that Roeder is linked to militant anti-abortion groups, but at the same time tell us he acted alone, before the investigation has even started.
* Roeder has never been a member, volunteer or contributor to Operation Rescue.
* Roeder posted some comments on the Operation Rescue forum that are peaceful in nature.
* Roeder has no history of violence. Criminologists can tell you that it is very rare for non-violent people to suddenly become violent after the age of 50.
* Roeder opposed abortion, which is his right to believe.
* Roeder was pro-life, which contradicts the notion that he would kill someone.
* Roeder is being called a "lone nut", just like Lee Harvey Oswald and many other scapegoats of history.
* They keep telling us Roeder has a criminal record, even though the appeals court threw out his conviction because of government misconduct.
* The crime Roeder was accused of did not involve any initiation of force against another person, it was a regulatory technicality.
* Roeder's vindictive & disgruntled ex-wife is being quoted in the news.
* No eyewitnesses saw Roeder at the crime scene.
* They did not get the license plate of the vehicle that left the scene, which makes his arrest suspicious and the ID of him unreliable.
* Roeder is a political activist. Shooting an abortion doctor does not benefit his cause, it benefits the cause of his political opponents.
* If Roeder is really crazy, why has he not spoken to the media? If Roeder is not crazy, then this entire case makes no sense at all.
* Roeder is a political activist who has the nation's attention. Why has he not talked to the media? Why does the news only report one side of the story?
* Where is the smoking gun?
Not all pro-life people support the death penalty. What Roeder's views on the death penalty are, is unknown.
Also, most people who favor the death penalty favor it only for murder, usually first degree murder.
Being in favor of the death penalty for murder is the exact opposite of being in favor of murdering people, which is what someone did to Tiller.
It is obvious from the media coverage that the "authorities" are attempting to convict Roeder in the media. Usually when this is done, they trumpet the strongest evidence. In this case, no real evidence has been trumpeted, possibly because the evidence has not been manufactured yet.
Roeder is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
....
Beware 'Lone Nut' Theory in Tiller's Murder
....
Beware the 'Lone Nut' Theory
....
http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/4030/context/archive
