Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
' The dead whisper from the dust ' Now THAT catches the attention. What a powerful line.
Click to expand...

You will never find substantive information from Jones and the other 911 liars you support. You can't find anything to cut and paste to support your moronic ideas on 911; you have to do real research and learn how to use logic and sound judgment after gaining knowledge. You will have to work to understand 911 and you have chosen not to do the hard work; you have chosen the easy road of letting other people do your thinking for you and repeating their lies and delusions as your own.

Please great poster of moronic videos tell us how the dust caused 911?
 
FineWine said:
No, I don't remember the White House ordering the EPA to doctor statements about air quality, and neither does anybody else. Looks like you're lying again.

By the way, have you ever given a second's thought to why the White House would want people to breathe contaminated air?

Of course I'm being silly!
Click to expand...

I think the story goes that they did not want to interfere with the smooth running of Wall stret and they thought it was a small price to pay. for that .
 
bill smith said:
I think the story goes that they did not want to interfere with the smooth running of Wall stret and they thought it was a small price to pay. for that .
Click to expand...

You really should not do that, you suck at it!

ETA: Still no evidence, I see.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I think the story goes that they did not want to interfere with the smooth running of Wall stret and they thought it was a small price to pay. for that .
Click to expand...
Dumb idea from 911TruthLies? What moron made up that idea? How do you find the most shallow lies on 911 that you post?
 
Last edited:
Dog Town said:
You really should not do that, you suck at it!

ETA: Still no evidence, I see.
Click to expand...

Jones says it at he end of the lecture. The 'small price to pay' was my own logical exptrapolaton. Otherwise they wold not have done it.
 
bill smith said:
Jones says it at he end of the lecture. The 'small price to pay' was my own logical exptrapolaton. Otherwise they wold not have done it.
Click to expand...

So you just repeat stuff idiots tell you. With an ad-lib, here or there. Makes you look incredibly foolish.
 
bill smith said:
Jones says it at he end of the lecture. The 'small price to pay' was my own logical exptrapolaton. Otherwise they wold not have done it.
Click to expand...

This is your MO Bill. Your evidence is always second hand rubbish and hearsay. ALL provided by your loony masters, whom you follow like blinded sheep - hanging off every dumb word. Keep it up. The amusement factor is tremendous when your around.
 
bill smith said:
I think the story goes that they did not want to interfere with the smooth running of Wall stret and they thought it was a small price to pay. for that .
Click to expand...


Fascinating story. Tell us again, how many days was the Stock Exchange closed?

Oh, while you're busy making up more idiocy, tell us why your imaginary conspiracy knocked down the towers in the first place. To those of us who are sane, that myth never made a lick of sense.

I almost forgot. You keep running from my question about your stupid movement's failed predictions. Explain why nothing you frauds predicted actually happened.
 
Did I understand Steven Jones correctly when he said in the attached video about NIST having set thermal expansion to ''zero' in their computer model for the collapse of column 79 in WTC7 ? Didn''t they say that the thermal expansion of the long beam spans was a major contributor to the collapse ? So large columns don't expand at all under heat but long beam spans do ?

Lawdy Lawdy this just gets better and better and madder and madder.lol
http://johnp.blip.tv/
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Did I understand Steven Jones correctly when he said in the attached video about NIST having set thermal expansion to ''zero' in their computer model for the collapse of column 79 in WTC7 ? Didn''t they say that the thermal expansion of the long beam spans was a major contributor to the collapse ? So large columns don't expand at all under heat but long beam spans do ?

Lawdy Lawdy this just gets better and better and madder and madder.lol
http://johnp.blip.tv/
Click to expand...

So you're done with the EPA stuff? Run Forrest... Run!
 
bill smith said:
Did I understand Steven Jones correctly when he said in the attached video about NIST having set thermal expansion to ''zero' in their computer model for the collapse of column 79 in WTC7 ? Didn''t they saythat the thermal expansion of the long beam spans was a major contributor to the collapse ? So large columns don't expand at all under heat but long beam spans do ?

Lawdy Lawdy this just gets better and better and madder and madder.lol
http://johnp.blip.tv/
Click to expand...

Did I hear Jones say he was fired for making up moronic ideas about 911? Yes I did.
Good job cherry-picking things you can't explain whereas I explained clearly how Jones produces his first paper of lies all rational people clearly understand as lies; and he was fired. You on the other hand pick a factor Jones has no clue about just like his being fired and produce zero comment or back up for Jones failed ideas and conclusions.

If only you had some knowledge to understand 911 you could identify and spot Jones for a fraud and a liar. But you don't have knowledge.

Jones is insane or stupid; take your pick. 100 plus minutes of stupid from Jones who was fired for his lies on 911.




If only you were an engineer you would not be repeating the stupidity of Jones. (albeit unless you were one of the 0.00087 percent of world engineers who would support his moronic conclusions) Are you one of those failed engineers? You don't have a clue what Jones talks about or you would support it with scientific information instead of talk.

Here is your entire scientific analysis of Jones' tripe.
Lawdy Lawdy
Click to expand...
What does it mean? If you say it twice does it mean you are free from producing evidence to support Jones' lies?
 
Last edited:
tfk said:
Bill: "Eureka, the smoking gun that will blow the lid off the conspi... Ohhh, something shiny!!"

LoL

tk
Click to expand...
You know T...I wonder how many smoking guns can pile up before the FBI are forced to be seen to pay attention ? I mean the premier crime ighting force in the world cannot credibly ignore the mounting evidence for too much longer. I mean can they ?

Remember that they sent Richard Gage what amounted to a letter of praise for his '' interesting and thoroughly researched '' paper on 9/11. They said it would be analysed by their specialists. To tell you the truth I think the Obama administration is moving towards disclosure.
 
Last edited:
It is clear that the pressure is mounting on the FBI to take action involving reopening the 9/11 investigation. Will they make an announcement that they are going to reinvestigate and take the risk that he grass roots will instantly catch fire forcing hem into a much wider and deeper investigation than they might otherwise want or will they just suddenly arrest some high-profile people and say that they were involved with Al-Quaeda in the events of 9/11. Then they could say that they have rooted out he inside job component of 9/11 and refuse to say more for reasons of National Security (or a variation on that theme).

I don't believe for a minute that this would be accepted but they might think that it has a chance of working. There is nothing else on the menu for them as ar as I can see.
 
Last edited:
MikeW said:
One would be a good place to start.
Click to expand...

You are wrong Mike. There are many smoking guns. If you choose not to accept that that is your own affair. It won't make a blind bit of difference in the end though. The Truth will come out.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
You are wrong Mike. There are many smoking guns. If you choose not to accept that that is your own affair. It won't make a blind bit of difference in the end though. The Truth will come out.
Click to expand...

Your loose definition of "smoking gun" aside, you are totally wrong, and will continue to be wrong until what you call "The Truth" actually comes out. You can make any claim and call any bit of conjecture and half truth a smoking gun, but IT is what won't make a bit of difference in the end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom