Split Thread What happened to Flight 93?

roundhead said:
“There wasn’t a trace of an airplane,” he said. “There was only a crater where it made impact. I’m not a real emotional person, but I am saddened by the whole thing.” - Tribune-Democrat (10/06/07)
Click to expand...

Can you say "context"?

Do you really think he was sad because an airliner DIDN'T crash there?
 
Sorry, the report I read called it a stone quarry, and it is owned by a stone quarry company. HOWEVER, anthracite is actually harder than limestone, which I assumed given the geology of that area, so the physics does not change at all.

Anthracite is 3.5 on the Mohs hardness scale.

Limestone is 3 on that scale.

Once again we see how dishonest, cruel, tactless, and feckless truthers focus on an anomaly that means nothing at all, and conclude "Inside Jobby-Job."

What jerks.
 
roundhead said:
Key word in the quote is.."The crash and subsequent investigation created a depression:(note it never says the initial hole was anywhere near that big)..because initially the hole was nowhere near 85 by 85 and 27 feet deep. It might have been after they saw how stupid the original small hole looked to initial witnesses who saw nothing in it and said it was 15 feet deep, and began digging again to make it bigger.
Click to expand...

That digging would be done by the bulldozer we do not see and we use all the early witnesses as fake bodies for the crash investigators.

I like it when a plan comes together.
 
beachnut said:
Coal is a readily combustible black or brownish-black sedimentary rock.

Rock = Relatively hard, naturally formed mineral or petrified matter; stone.

Strip mine = An open mine, especially a coal mine

Quarry = An open excavation or pit from which stone is obtained by digging, cutting, or blasting

You could call a coal mine open excavation a stone quarry. Looks like this proves you have no case on Flight 93. You also have no clue what a rock is or why coal is a rock.


We have to assume since you were wrong and coal is a rock that your flight 911 ideas are also wrong.
Click to expand...

Boy, you are going to a lot of trouble to admit i was correct in stating a strip mine used to procure coal wouldnt be called a rock quarry, except on here.

But thanks anyway:D
 
roundhead said:
Boy, you are going to a lot of trouble to admit i was correct in stating a strip mine used to procure coal wouldnt be called a rock quarry, except on here.

But thanks anyway:D
Click to expand...
Your delusion?
I see you are applying some of that great logic you use to make up moronic lies about 911. Good job :D:D:D


Does this tangential crap mean you have lost the 93 did not impact scam you are pushing? :D:D:D
 
Last edited:
roundhead said:
Boy, you are going to a lot of trouble to admit i was correct in stating a strip mine used to procure coal wouldnt be called a rock quarry, except on here.

But thanks anyway:D
Click to expand...

Except for...
Types of rock extracted from quarries include:

Cinder
Chalk
China Clay
Clay
Coal
Coquina
Construction aggregate (sand and gravel)
Globigerina Limestone (Malta)
Granite
Gritstone
Gypsum
Limestone
Marble
Ores
Phosphate rock
Sandstone
Slate
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarry

Did you just lie? Again?
 
Can we drop the discussion about coal? It's really not that important, and it is exactly the sort of thing truthers like to glom onto instead of discussing the central issues.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Can we drop the discussion about coal? It's really not that important, and it is exactly the sort of thing truthers like to glom onto instead of discussing the central issues.
Click to expand...

That is how roundhead is able to justify ignoring the HUGE amount of evidence presented to him in this thread that contradicts his 'theory'. Just start talking about something else.

I would PAY to see you in a court of law arguing there was no plane in the face of the evidence to the contrary, roundhead. I seriously would.
 
I just like how these truthers like to demand that we show some proof in the form of a precedent and when you finally find something that meets every nook and cranny they demand they either ignore it or find something else to completely discredit it...
 
roundhead said:
they said the hole was 6-15 foot deep and no sign of a plane was in it.........

lets hope someday they are asked that in a court.

For now, all we can do is take their statements at face value.
Click to expand...

You "hope"? You supposedly have iron-clad eyewitness testimony that proves a massive conspiracy, and the best you can do is "hope"?

Why don't you or anyone else the in Truth Movement actually take action?
 
Last edited:
johnny karate said:
roundhead, out of the hundreds of eyewitnesses, first responders, and crash scene investigators, not a single one has corroborated your claim that UA93 did not crash in Shanksville.

Do you feel this is because they are cowards too afraid to tell the truth about the faked crash site, in the same way you've characterized the FDNY as cowards, or is it that they are too ignorant to realize the crash site was faked, in the same way you've characterized the world's population of engineers as ignorant?
Click to expand...

Bump for brave sir roundhead. Why is he so terrified of this question? Is it because he's too ashamed to give his honest answer?
 
johnny karate said:
Bump for brave sir roundhead. Why is he so terrified of this question? Is it because he's too ashamed to give his honest answer?
Click to expand...

Good luck. I'm still trying to get him to expound on his own theory that a person hovering a foot or so off the pavement in Dallas shot the president without anyone seeing.

Arguing with truthers like this is futile, since they don't at all mind looking stupid and cowardly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom