How disrespectful can truthers be?

[beachnut]

Further off-topic dodge noted.

Again I ask, do you have any proof that the vandalism was done by "truthers"?

If you go off topic again I will have to start reporting people to the Mods as this is getting ridiculous

You are off topic again in your first sentence be sure to report your government lies statement too.

I ask you again why do you support vandalism by 911TruthLies? You failed to condemn the disrespect. Why?

Your statement of being off topic is off topic so please add yourself to the report I added all your posts as delusions and as disrespectful.

Exactly what was off topic? Your government lies? Or your delusional false flag without evidence statement.

"Again I ask, do you have any proof that the vandalism was" a false-flag operation? Are you dyslexic and do you have a can of paint?

 

[dtugg]

False flag vandalism? I couldn't make this stuff if I tried! I'm still laughing!

 

[Minadin]

Maybe it was a false-flag debunker doing the false-flag truther graffiti, which means he was just a truther . . . pretending to be a realist . . . (have we never seen that?) . . . so . . .

COINTELPRO.

 

[aggle-rithm]

If you go off topic again I will have to start reporting people to the Mods as this is getting ridiculous

"Won't SOMEBODY think of the CHILDREN?!?"

Desperate histrionics noted.

 

[aggle-rithm]

False flag vandalism? I couldn't make this stuff if I tried! I'm still laughing!

As if the truthers needed any outside help to become targets of ridicule...

 

[tsig]

False flag vandalism? I couldn't make this stuff if I tried! I'm still laughing!

The whole US thing is a deep cover plot by the British Monarchy.

 

[SteveAustin]

I just assumed that the whole issue was one of speculation any way. I doubt anyone really cares if there is proof, or not, or if a truther really did this or not. My only comment was concerning your transparent attempt to turn this issue into one of "evidence" and "proof" and throwing it back in debunkers faces, when you have to know that this more of a light, fluff topic rather than one warranting any real investigation etc...

but carry on, if it makes you happy.

TAM

No your comment was to try and further insult and throw mud at ALL "truthers" just like everyone else on this thread. What I came here to do was to point out a very simple point, and that is all you debunkers are bad mouthing ALL "truthers" for vandalizing a memorial without any evidence of who actually vandalized the memorial.

Now that is irony at it's best...I mean all you "debunkers" always go on and on about needing evidence and demanding evidence but I guess that does not apply to "debunkers"

And look at how defensive everyone has become when I pointed this out!! (the constant attempts to derail the thread are really obvious)

And no one wants to admit they were wrong to automatically "assume" it was a "truther" and start slinging the mud (which is JREF standard procedure)

Your post here TAM was the closest anyone has come to admiting there is no proof and you say you don't care that there is no proof, so when you joined in and started slinging mud at "truthers" about this vandalism you did it knowing full well there was no proof which makes you a hypocrite.

Anyone else want to continue to pretend they are not hypocrites by slinging insults at ALL "truthers" for this act of vandalism without even evidence of who did it?

 

[SteveAustin]

My apologies mods before hand

steve
you want to know why I know that was a truther
one - that sign in on the Long Island Expressway ONE OF THE BUSIEST AND HEAVILY PATROLLED AREAS IN THE COUNTRY
NO ONE MAKING A "FALSE FLAG PROTEST" (as ridiculous as that sounds) WOULD DO IT THERE its too easy to get caught

2 - THIS IS (rule10)ING NEW YORK, (rule10)hole
MY NEIGHBORS ARE (rule10)ING DEAD
EVERY ONE LOST SOMEONE THAT DAY AROUND HERE
NOOOOOOOOOOOO ONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THAT ISNTTTTTTTTTT A TRUTHERRRRRRRRRRRRRR WOULD DO THAT HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE,
(rule10)hole
all those posts you added to this thread and not an ounce of remorse for a vandalized memorial REGARDLESS OF WHO DID IT

PULL YOU HEAD OUT OF YOUR SELF IMPORTANT (rule10)
moron

again mods im sorry

So in other words you have no evidence only your assumption and you are assuming that because you are angry and want to lash out at anyone and "truthers" are the convenient scapegoat.

I understand. A lot of people lost loved ones on 9/11, it was tragic and very sad.

You did not post this to comment on the memorial but to comment on that "truthers" are "disrespectul" so and so's as your thread title says and as every post here has said. If you simply wanted to comment on a memorial.

You can play the "anger" card here and imply that I am being "disrespectful" but I am not the one using a memorial to bash another group. That would be disrespectful

 

[SteveAustin]

You are off topic again in your first sentence be sure to report your government lies statement too.

I ask you again why do you support vandalism by 911TruthLies? You failed to condemn the disrespect. Why?

Your statement of being off topic is off topic so please add yourself to the report I added all your posts as delusions and as disrespectful.

Exactly what was off topic? Your government lies? Or your delusional false flag without evidence statement.

"Again I ask, do you have any proof that the vandalism was" a false-flag operation? Are you dyslexic and do you have a can of paint?

You keep dodging and weaving there buddy. You are the one claiming it was a "truther" that vandalised the memorial so you need to show the proof of this. I have never claimed it was anyone one way or the other, I will wait for evidence to evaluate before I make a decision on that one, you however being a debunker automaitically assumed it was a "truther" because that is how you work.

So again, stop dodging and stop trying to derail the thread. Either show proof that it was a "truther" or admit you were wrong to bash "truthers" for this one.

 

[dtugg]

Keep up the great work StevenAustin! This is comedy gold!

 

[SteveAustin]

Keep up the great work StevenAustin! This is comedy gold!

That's not proof that a "truther" vandalized the memorial!

But your enjoyment in this thread is noted. But maybe you should rethink that enjoyment because some people might see that as disrespectful.

 

[SteveAustin]

Anyone else want to jump in with their "assumptions" of who committed this act of vandalism and verbally assault them?

Anyone else want to jump in and "assume" what my thoughts and feelings on the matter are so you can verbally assault me?

Using this incident as an excuse to verbally assault anyone is extremely disrespectful and anyone with an ounce of decency would stop immediately and apologize to the dead for their actions.

JREF debunkers have never needed any excuse to verbally assault "truthers" before so why do it here?

I can believe that the OP was genuine in his anger at the vandalism and that his assumption as to who did it was also genuine even if without proof. Then the thread became an excuse for everyone to verbally assault ALL "truthers".

 

[dtugg]

That's not proof that a "truther" vandalized the memorial!

But your enjoyment in this thread is noted. But maybe you should rethink that enjoyment because some people might see that as disrespectful.

Some people, meaning you. And frankly I couldn't care less if a twoofer thinks me laughing in his face is disrespectful. It's intended as such.

 

[TexasJack]

I think a debunker did it, definitely false flag vandalism at its finest. Haven't any of you heard of false flag vandalism? Come on!

 

[DavidJames]

Using this incident as an excuse to verbally assault anyone is extremely disrespectful and anyone with an ounce of decency would stop immediately and apologize to the dead for their actions.

This tactic of the 9/11 CTists is one of my favorites.

They can accuse people of being complicit in mass murder without evidence but goodness gracious if they perceive they've been insulted, they get their panties all in a bunch. RedIbis is currently the queen at this, but it looks like Austin's panties bunch even tighter then Red's.

FWIW - I don't care who did the painting, it's vandalism.

 

[SteveAustin]

I think a debunker did it, definitely false flag vandalism at its finest. Haven't any of you heard of false flag vandalism? Come on!

Now there is the proof...oh wait no, still no proof. All this was is;

"38 Become personal, insulting and rude as soon as you perceive that your opponent has the upper hand.
In becoming personal you leave the subject altogether, and turn your attack on the person by remarks of an offensive and spiteful character.
This is a very popular technique, because it takes so little skill to put it into effect."

Which is standard protocol here at JREF as EVERY SINGLE thread in the "9/11 conspiracy theory" forums has them.

Do you have any proof a "truther" did it?

Tell me why are all the debunkers here avoiding even attempting to answer that question? (well except TAM who at least had the decency to admit that he was accusing "truthers" so he could verbally assault them without any proof)

Please someone show me proof or admit you don't want proof but only wanted to verbally assault "truthers" in this thread even if it is disrespectful to the dead.

 

[SteveAustin]

This tactic of the 9/11 CTists is one of my favorites.

They can accuse people of being complicit in mass murder without evidence but goodness gracious if they perceive they've been insulted, they get their panties all in a bunch. RedIbis is currently the queen at this, but it looks like Austin's panties bunch even tighter then Red's..

You know this applies to debunkers just as well as anyone else, only debunkers would never admit it. (most would not)

FWIW - I don't care who did the painting, it's vandalism.

Agreed. Regardless of who did it, it is still vandalism AND disrespectful

 

[Dave Rogers]

Post #83, in which SteveAustin becomes personal, insulting and rude.

Why?

I mean there is no evidence one way or the other, but please explain to those of us who are not as intelligent as you why it has to logically be a truther!

Edit: Oh ya I forgot, JREF Debunkers like to come to their preferred conclusions before any real investigation has taken place.

If you think that because the vandalism said "inside job" that that means it had to be a "truther" then I can understand why you fall for the government lies with regard to 9/11, you simply uncritically believe what they tell you to believe. Of course no cop worth his badge is going to assume it was a "truther" until he has done a complete investigation, but no one has ever accused JREF Debunkers of being logical or rational.

And then, in post #136, suddenly it turns out that becoming personal, insulting and rude is a sign of having lost the argument.

"38 Become personal, insulting and rude as soon as you perceive that your opponent has the upper hand.
In becoming personal you leave the subject altogether, and turn your attack on the person by remarks of an offensive and spiteful character.
This is a very popular technique, because it takes so little skill to put it into effect."

As usual, I feel no further need to comment.

Dave

 

[johnny karate]

Do you have any proof a "truther" did it?

Tell me why are all the debunkers here avoiding even attempting to answer that question? (well except TAM who at least had the decency to admit that he was accusing "truthers" so he could verbally assault them without any proof)

Please someone show me proof or admit you don't want proof but only wanted to verbally assault "truthers" in this thread even if it is disrespectful to the dead.

Several posters, myself included, have addressed your increasingly tedious question. You were apparently too busy being outraged to notice.

Like most things in life, we will probably never know definitively that a Truther was responsible for the vandalisim. However, common sense and the laws of probabilty dictate it was most likely a Truther. And for the purposes of this thread, that's good enough.

If this is somehow problematic for you, and I think I speak for everyone when I say this, feel free to go away.

 

[johnny karate]

You know this applies to debunkers just as well as anyone else, only debunkers would never admit it. (most would not)

Please present your evidence for this claim.