• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

New Conjecture Regarding the Alleged Planes on 9/11

Galileo

Illuminator
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
3,368
I'm not saying I agree with this theory, but just thought I'd throw it into the mix, see what the JREF experts think.

Galileo's Conjecture

OK, there has been a lot of controversy about whether there were planes or there weren't planes at the Pentagon, or the WTC, or at Shankesville, it seems like it goes on, and on, and on....

Well, and this is just a hypothesis as I am a solid pro-planer, what if we threw out the assumption of symmetry?

What about that?

What if the only plane that was hijacked on 9/11 and flown into the target as advertised was FL175?

That's the one we all saw on TV?

What if FL11, FL77, and FL93 were hijacked as well, but landed somewhere, and the events at the Pentagon/WTC1/Shankesville were caused by military planes and/or bombs and/or missiles?

It would easier to fake a plane crash if there is less attention given to the scene. Only FL175 had a lot of people watching when it came in.

Also, the cookie cutter outline appears for the "possibly" faked FL11 crash, but not for FL175.

You can also clearly see that FL175 is a normal plane, but not FL11.

Fetzer may have been wandering in the dark.

I always say, when tensions run tough, compromise.

[you could also call this Galileo's Compromise]

Remember, in the remote chance that this theory turns out to be correct, I thought of it first!

Galileo's Conjecture

:shocked::k:

:dc_jimlad::Dancing_cool::dc_biggrin::D

:cool:

PS - the military seems to lie about pretty much everything.
 
Last edited:
Utterly absurd theory. Nothing in the world to suggest it. Why fake three planes and use one real one? Your illogic knows no boundaries, does it?
 
Utterly absurd theory. Nothing in the world to suggest it. Why fake three planes and use one real one? Your illogic knows no boundaries, does it?

you are just afraid to throw out the assumption of symmetry!

HA!!

:jaw-dropp
 
.....

What if FL11, FL77, and FL93 were hijacked as well, but landed somewhere, and the events at the Pentagon/WTC1/Shankesville were caused by military planes and/or bombs and/or missiles?

....

PS - the military seems to lie about pretty much everything.


So the military staged, or helped to stage, 9/11? You don't know very many military folks do you? They love their country and serve it proudly.

Oh and evidence that the military lies about everything? Just one example would be a start.
 
I'm not saying I agree with this theory, but just thought I'd throw it into the mix, see what the JREF experts think.

Galileo's Conjecture

OK, there has been a lot of controversy about whether there were planes or there weren't planes at the Pentagon, or the WTC, or at Shankesville, it seems like it goes on, and on, and on....

Well, and this is just a hypothesis as I am a solid pro-planer, what if we threw out the assumption of symmetry?

What about that?

What if the only plane that was hijacked on 9/11 and flown into the target as advertised was FL175?

That's the one we all saw on TV?

What if FL11, FL77, and FL93 were hijacked as well, but landed somewhere, and the events at the Pentagon/WTC1/Shankesville were caused by military planes and/or bombs and/or missiles?

It would easier to fake a plane crash if there is less attention given to the scene. Only FL175 had a lot of people watching when it came in.

Also, the cookie cutter outline appears for the "possibly" faked FL11 crash, but not for FL175.

You can also clearly see that FL175 is a normal plane, but not FL11.

Fetzer may have been wandering in the dark.

I always say, when tensions run tough, compromise.

[you could also call this Galileo's Compromise]

Remember, in the remote chance that this theory turns out to be correct, I thought of it first!

Galileo's Conjecture

:shocked::k:

:dc_jimlad::Dancing_cool::dc_biggrin::D

:cool:

PS - the military seems to lie about pretty much everything.

Why do all of that when it would be far eaiser to just crash the planes in the first place?

There's an old Dutch proverb that goes like this:

That's Dutch? My old defensive back coach used to say that a lot... Then he always added "M********A!"
 
Last edited:
...
PS - the military seems to lie about pretty much everything.
You are the liar and the delusion expert. I served in the military for 28 years so my fellow citizens could make up lies and post them here and act insane saying they are the Galileo if they choose. I held up my part of the bargain and you call me a liar; and I say thank you for letting me protect your country so you can post lies, slander, delusions, dirt dumb ideas, and insult my fellow soldiers who are much more worthy of praise than I. The only good part would be if you are not a United State citizen.

you are pathetic posting lies without evidence; and this is the only truth about you and the lies you post

You post some of the most idiotic ideas on 911; how do you avoid evidence, facts and reality so easily?
 
Last edited:
So the military staged, or helped to stage, 9/11? You don't know very many military folks do you? They love their country and serve it proudly.

Oh and evidence that the military lies about everything? Just one example would be a start.

Yes, I know they do.

Sometimes its not easy to sacrifice 3000 people for the cause. We need our military empire to support the dollar. Since the dollar is a fiat currency, it has to no real power behind it except the U.S. military.

If not for 9/11, the dollar would have collapsed by now, and we would be in a financial crisis.

A lot of people think the mass murder was evil, but it was actually done to benefit all of us. Even the people killed were compensated with $3 million for their service to their country.
 
Why do all of that when it would be far eaiser to just crash the planes in the first place?

Not really. It is probably easier to do a fake crash, if few witnesses are around.

If a lot of witnesses, then a real crash is easier.
 
240-185 said:
My eyes! Such stoopidness! They're burning! Quick, some ignore pills!
Although it is tempting to witness of the spectacle of such near-complete eclipsing of intelligence and reason by stupidity,
NASA
advises you to never view such eclipses without eye protection.
 
Not really. It is probably easier to do a fake crash, if few witnesses are around.

If a lot of witnesses, then a real crash is easier.

How do ya figure?
Easier to land the real plane somewhere, dismantle or destroy it (along with passengers) then fake a plane crash where you plant the remains of said passengers without detection, etc etc....

And you think that's EASIER than simply crashing the plane?
 
If a lot of witnesses

dead_thread.jpg
 
Yes, I know they do.
Even the people killed were compensated with $3 million for their service to their country.
:eek: :eek:

3000 innocent people from all over the world split $3 million or got $3 million each?
were they paid in gold bullion, diamonds, cheques or good ole u.s. dollars?

please go to ground zero this year and hold up a big sign with a big smile that says:

911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
EVEN THE DEAD WERE
PAID THE SUM OF
$3 MILLION EACH
FOR DYING.


and when someone puts a noose around your neck start yelling

PULL IT, PULL IT, PULL IT.

do it! just think how famous you will be.

The 911 dancing twoofer!
:jaw-dropp
 
:eek: :eek:

3000 innocent people from all over the world split $3 million or got $3 million each?
were they paid in gold bullion, diamonds, cheques or good ole u.s. dollars?

please go to ground zero this year and hold up a big sign with a big smile that says:

911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
EVEN THE DEAD WERE
PAID THE SUM OF
$3 MILLION EACH
FOR DYING.


and when someone puts a noose around your neck start yelling

PULL IT, PULL IT, PULL IT.

do it! just think how famous you will be.

The 911 dancing twoofer!
:jaw-dropp

Hey, it wasn't my idea. Some guy at the Pentagon dreamed it up.

3000 lost their lives, but that is a small price to pay so that 300 million can have a strong dollar.

3000 is fewer than we lost in Iraq for Christ sake.
 
Why is it that the dollar is weaker than it was in 2001, troll who was born in 1564?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom