• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

New Conjecture Regarding the Alleged Planes on 9/11

dtugg said:
Why is it that the dollar is weaker than it was in 2001, troll who was born in 1564?
Click to expand...

Because the 9/11 Truth movement has been so effective.

The dollar is much stronger than in 1564, at least.
 
Come on, you're not even trying. I guess after trolling for two years, it's hard to come up with new material.
 
Galileo said:
Not really. It is probably easier to do a fake crash, if few witnesses are around.

If a lot of witnesses, then a real crash is easier.
Click to expand...

No. To fake it one would have to...

a.) Hide, threaten, or pay off the victims and hope they don't talk.
b.) Get DNA samples of said victims.
c.) Get another plane of the same type as the one that was lost to spread wreckage, or crash a similar one and hope no one notices.
d.) Put the DNA of said victims on a new plane.
e.) Pay off or threaten air traffic controllers to over look any oddities on their screens.
g.) Pay off or threaten first responders to lie about what they find.
h.) Pay off or threaten any witnesses.
i.) Pay off or threaten any military folk who come in contact with any of the evidence.
etc... etc...

OR...

Crash the plane with the people on it.
 
Redtail said:
No. To fake it one would have to...

a.) Hide, threaten, or pay off the victims and hope they don't talk.
b.) Get DNA samples of said victims.
c.) Get another plane of the same type as the one that was lost to spread wreckage, or crash a similar one and hope no one notices.
d.) Put the DNA of said victims on a new plane.
e.) Pay off or threaten air traffic controllers to over look any oddities on their screens.
g.) Pay off or threaten first responders to lie about what they find.
h.) Pay off or threaten any witnesses.
i.) Pay off or threaten any military folk who come in contact with any of the evidence.
etc... etc...

OR...

Crash the plane with the people on it.
Click to expand...

The fake shootout with Pat Tillman didn't involve this stuff. You are making things up.
 
Galileo said:
The fake shootout with Pat Tillman didn't involve this stuff. You are making things up.
Click to expand...
You make up lies about 911 based on your own delusions.

Your lies can't be corrected since they are based on your delusions. The military did not lie; the military corrects liars and kicks them out or punishes them. If you were in the military you would be kicked out for telling lies.
 
Galileo said:
The fake shootout with Pat Tillman didn't involve this stuff. You are making things up.
Click to expand...

First off it wasn't "fake" second... Well no, it didn't (what with there not being planes, passengers, buildings.) but you're ignoring the fact that people in the military CAME FORWARD and told the family and talked to the press about what happened. Hell ESPN had a special where members of 2nd Batt. talked about what happened.

Do you believe that the military in general could just kill thousands and be bullied or payed off into keeping quiet but members of an elite squad screw up, cover it up but then crack and come clean because of one guy? Nah, you gotta pick one there sparky.
 
Galileo said:
OK, there has been a lot of controversy about whether there were planes or there weren't planes at the Pentagon, or the WTC, or at Shankesville,
Click to expand...

No, there is no controversy at all.
 
I have a similar theory, but mines more interesting cause it involves Robots.
 
Galileo said:
Because the 9/11 Truth movement has been so effective.

The dollar is much stronger than in 1564, at least.
Click to expand...

The 9/11 truth movement has more influence over the economy than the military and U.S. government?


Go on. Pull the other one.
 
jhunter1163 said:
You're not the first person who thought of a single-plane theory, Galileo.

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/new_oliver_stone_9_11_film
Click to expand...

And I thought Fetzer was nuts ! Dig this explanation by Oliver Stone !

World Trade Center, which stars Nicolas Cage as a dedicated Port Authority officer who stumbles on secret evidence amid the rubble and carnage of the terrorist attack, tells a story quite different from what Stone called "the official government line" about the event. According to the film, at 8:46 a.m., a lone commercial airliner flew diagonally through the North Tower of the World Trade Center, maintained a circular holding pattern for approximately 17 minutes, then struck the South Tower before heading to the Pentagon.
Oliver Stone

Stone

After its collision with the center of American military operations, the so-called "magic plane"—which variously and ingeniously identified itself to air-traffic controllers as "American Airlines Flight 11," "United Airlines Flight 175," "American Airlines Flight 77" and "United Airlines Flight 93"—took to the skies once again, landing at a top-secret "black-ops" Air Force base in West Virginia, where it was reloaded with a group of clones from another shadowy government program that Stone described as "shocking."
 
BasqueArch said:
And I thought Fetzer was nuts ! Dig this explanation by Oliver Stone !

World Trade Center, which stars Nicolas Cage as a dedicated Port Authority officer who stumbles on secret evidence amid the rubble and carnage of the terrorist attack, tells a story quite different from what Stone called "the official government line" about the event. According to the film, at 8:46 a.m., a lone commercial airliner flew diagonally through the North Tower of the World Trade Center, maintained a circular holding pattern for approximately 17 minutes, then struck the South Tower before heading to the Pentagon.
Oliver Stone
Click to expand...

Yeah he's quite the joker, that Oliver Stone :)
 
On behalf of all current and former military members, G (I refuse to call you by the name of a man who was known for being actually right the majority of the time), I just have to say this. I have fought, and thousands, if not hundreds of thousands (I'm counting every military member who has ever died in that amount) have DIED, just so you have the right to spout your drivel on an internet forum. See, the military has this little value called INTEGRITY (something you seem to know very little about) that tells us to choose the hard right over the easy wrong action. Next time you want to spout something with ZERO evidence to your credit, you might want to consider that. I am insulted, and I am saddened that you can't see that. When military members lie or break that value, they are generally caught, and are punished accordingly. It violates the principles and articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to do so, and believe me, the punishments are severe for doing so.

I dare you to provide ONE example of the military blatantly lying about something in order to profit off of it. I DARE you.

I imagine I'll be waiting a very very very very very very very very very very very very very very (you get the idea) long time for said evidence.
 
Sabrina said:
On behalf of all current and former military members, G (I refuse to call you by the name of a man who was known for being actually right the majority of the time), I just have to say this. I have fought, and thousands, if not hundreds of thousands (I'm counting every military member who has ever died in that amount) have DIED, just so you have the right to spout your drivel on an internet forum. See, the military has this little value called INTEGRITY (something you seem to know very little about) that tells us to choose the hard right over the easy wrong action. Next time you want to spout something with ZERO evidence to your credit, you might want to consider that. I am insulted, and I am saddened that you can't see that. When military members lie or break that value, they are generally caught, and are punished accordingly. It violates the principles and articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to do so, and believe me, the punishments are severe for doing so.

I dare you to provide ONE example of the military blatantly lying about something in order to profit off of it. I DARE you.

I imagine I'll be waiting a very very very very very very very very very very very very very very (you get the idea) long time for said evidence.
Click to expand...

Right On.
 
Hey, if Galileo's Conjecture turns out to be correct, then Fetzer was half-right the whole time!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom