So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

ULTIMA1 said:
If you will answer this question.

Do Fire Rescue teams go into burning buildings to resuce people all the time?
Click to expand...

another "if you do this" answer.

Fine. I'll play your silly game.

Yes, yes they do. Now, do they do it with hundred of pounds of explosives with them? nope.

I answered your question. Now present your proof that you have "several examples" of a burning building being pulled
 
ULTIMA1 said:
WRONG a fire commander informed the owner that the buidling could not be saved.

Silverstien agreed it was not worth anymore lives so the fire commander decided to pull it.
Click to expand...


For the last time, buildings cannot be "pulled." Demolition professionals use the term to refer to wrapping cables around a small structure. The term has NOTHING to do with explosives. Neither Silverstein nor the fire chief was talking about demolishing a building. That is an insane lie invented by crazy frauds like you.


The fire chief informed Silverstein that rescue operations were being ended. Silverstein agreed with the decision. Fire chiefs do not demolish buildings. You are seriously ill.
 
No, but you have not shown any example of someone pulling a 40+ story burning building before or after 9/11.

Why is that, Roger?

Shouldnt someone with NSA clearance be able to find that information?
 
How about one example. Roger. Just one to tide us over? It should be simple enough....since you seem to think every fire dept is trained to do this.

Show us an example of someone pulling a 40+ story burning building before or after 9/11.
 
ok, i'll give you time. It's 1 am CST here, and I'm racking out. I'll be back in 2 days time. surely you should have something by then
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am working on pulling up all my information i have, it will take some time.

As stated i actually do research not like most poeple on here.
Click to expand...


No, you do no research. You tell lies. All the time. You tried pretending that Nigro called Silverstein and you got caught. You keep insisting, insanely, that grown men were talking about somehow "pulling" a building. You are incapable of coping with the simplest logic. You are a fraud.
 
FineWine said:
No, you do no research. You tell lies. All the time.
Click to expand...

I can show FOIA request, you cannot. DO NOT LIE.


[/quote]You tried pretending that Nigro called Silverstein and you got caught. [/quote]

No i proved that Chief Nigro was the ranking officer anda should have known what was going on. Also the fact that he evacuated the firemen BEFORE the phone call.
 
Unsecured Coins said:
gotta bring 'em first.
Click to expand...


Heh. It's more than little revealing that he wants you to basically promise that you'll blindly accept whatever he posts before he even posts it.

Folks, ULTIMA1 is sick. I'm begging you; just ignore the insane man rambling on the street corner.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Becasue it shows that the fire commander could have only been talking about the building when he stated pull it.
Click to expand...

Hi all. First post here :)

here is the interview (i assume) this guy is "quoting"

from: edit: too new cant post links :(

The most important operational decision to be made that
afternoon was the collapse had damaged 7 World Trade
Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey
between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very
heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of
an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we
had to give up some rescue operations that were going on
at the time and back the people away far enough so that if
7 World Trade did collapse, we wouldn't lose any more
people.

We continued to operate on what we could from
that distance and approximately an hour and a half after
that order was giver., at 5:30 in the afternoon, World
Trade Center (7) collapsed completely

5:30 - 1.5 hours = 4pm was that so hard?
so now you say you can trust his words? enough to base your claims on?
i guess that means you agree with him that the building was very heavily damaged and was in imminent danger of collapse?

heres decent video of damage to 7
watch?v=pAVHbI9CKpU

and this one /watch?v=5GEEzHn4tqo
check out about 30 seconds in the smoke clears a little and you can see a gouge 3/4 of the way up the building (that wasnt present in pictures prior to 911)

Larry is a New Yorker
I too am a NYer and i can tell you were very busy people
we tend to condense what we say, making it easy to take things out of context

as far as the question a few pages back about Larry not wanting to invest his own money, and rely on private and govt backing? (even though the article didn't say that)
... I'd say that's bein' a good businessman lol
 
Justin39640 said:
Hi all. First post here :)

here is the interview (i assume) this guy is "quoting"

from: edit: too new cant post links :(

The most important operational decision to be made that
afternoon was the collapse had damaged 7 World Trade
Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey
between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very
heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of
an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we
had to give up some rescue operations that were going on
at the time and back the people away far enough so that if
7 World Trade did collapse, we wouldn't lose any more
people.

We continued to operate on what we could from
that distance and approximately an hour and a half after
that order was giver., at 5:30 in the afternoon, World
Trade Center (7) collapsed completely

5:30 - 1.5 hours = 4pm was that so hard?
so now you say you can trust his words? enough to base your claims on?
i guess that means you agree with him that the building was very heavily damaged and was in imminent danger of collapse?

heres decent video of damage to 7


and this one
check out about 30 seconds in the smoke clears a little and you can see a gouge 3/4 of the way up the building (that wasnt present in pictures prior to 911)

Larry is a New Yorker
I too am a NYer and i can tell you were very busy people
we tend to condense what we say, making it easy to take things out of context

as far as the question a few pages back about Larry not wanting to invest his own money, and rely on private and govt backing? (even though the article didn't say that)
... I'd say that's bein' a good businessman lol
Click to expand...

Hard to believe 911TruthLies us "pull it" to support their moronic claims.
 
How they cant even agree a little bit that the building might have suffered a lot of damage by the N tower is mind blowing to me.
No concept of the chaos of the day. "If it dont fit into a neat little box the government did it."
I hate that they completely ignore the fact (and just edit it out of videos) that the east penthouse is the collapse sequence beginning and not when the rest falls.

Again as a NYer I listened to the radio and watched the reports all day.
Very early on 1010 wins was reporting that BLDG 7 was "visibly" leaning towards the south and that collapse was a real fear.
This was no shock when it happened that day.

But all of this has been brought up before
Sometimes it makes me feel better to think they're just doing this for the sake of arguing.
Reminds me of this statement "But why? Why do we say the Earth is flat, when the vast majority says otherwise? Because we know the truth."
sadly i really know they believe this stuff with all their hearts

And most of these people never stepped foot into the towers when they were around
a few friends of mine were in there doing work on Sept 10th 2001.
They said that security was insane for contractors to get through and that EVERY day you had to get new ID badges (which had your picture on it) and that the process took an hour or more.
That job was to put up "distraction tape" on glass walls.
They were originally supposed to be back 7am on the 11th but a new job in midtown forced them to work OT on the 10th in the towers.
That saved their lives, its creepy looking at those IDs.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom