So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

Where is your proof that no explosives were used?

The NIST Report showed that no sounds of explosives going off were either heard or recorded. No physical evidence of explosives was found. The logistical task of wiring a 47-story building for demolition would be enormous, requiring teams of demolition professionals working for months. Nobody had a coherent motive for demolishing the building.

Evidence for your nonsensical myth doesn't exist.
 
The owner agrees, saying that in view of the terrible loss of life so far, probably the smartest thing is just to pull "it," the rescue operation..


Problem with your theory is that the firemen had been already evacuated by Chief Nigro.
 
Why don't you do some research and find out.

I have sent my FOIA requests today.

Because you're the pretend NSA expert and know everything.

And who did you send the FOIA request to?
 
Last edited:
Roger cant prove the building was pulled. I'm not certain why he even brings it up.

He has zero evidence to prove its ever been done before.

ASk him to show an example, and he quickly changes the subject. Its hilarious!
 
The NIST Report showed that no sounds of explosives going off were either heard or recorded.

Charges can be muffeled with sand bags.


No physical evidence of explosives was found.

What were they looking for?


The logistical task of wiring a 47-story building for demolition would be enormous, requiring teams of demolition professionals working for months.

Only if it was a normal demo, This was an emergency situation. Plus the building was already in a bad state.
 
Last edited:
Only if it was a normal demo, This was an emergency situation. Plus the buidling was alrfeady in a bad state.


But you have no proof it was "pulled". Plus you cant show an example of a 40+ story burning building ever being pulled before.

ArooooooOO!!!!
/
:dl:
 
Last edited:
Becasue we have the quote from Chief Nigro that he evacuated the firemen without talking to anyone, THAT INCLUDES ANY OF THE FIRE COMMANDERS. So that would mean the firemen were out of the building before the call.


OMG! We'll keep going.

Maybe the men were already out when the fire chief called Silverstein. There is no reason why this isn't a distinct possibility. BUT-- IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. NONE!

Can you grasp that much?

Do you understand that it is quite possible that when the fire chief informed the owner of the department's decision, it was already a done deed? Do you understand that nobody disputes this?

Although WE DO NOT KNOW WHEN THE CALL TO SILVERSTEIN WAS MADE OR WHO MADE IT, let us assume that the men had already been pulled out. What can your point possibly be?
 
Right after you produce one report that states firemen were in the building while the call to Silverstein was being made.



i have bene asking this all evening.


you made the claim that sandbags might have been used. you also said you could produce an example of a 40 story builing being pulled whilst encompassed by FIIIYAH. It seems my wish list is longer than yours.
 
Maybe the men were already out when the fire chief called Silverstein. There is no reason why this isn't a distinct possibility. BUT-- IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. NONE!

Yes it does make a difference. If the firemen were out of the building before the call was made then the fire commander could have only been talking about the building when he stated pull it.


Do you understand that it is quite possible that when the fire chief informed the owner of the department's decision, it was already a done deed? Do you understand that nobody disputes this?

See above.

Although WE DO NOT KNOW WHEN THE CALL TO SILVERSTEIN WAS MADE OR WHO MADE IT, let us assume that the men had already been pulled out. What can your point possibly be?


See above
 
Charges can be muffeled with sand bags.

It is insane to imagine that the thousands of pounds of charges required to take down a 47-stroy building could be "muffled."



What were they looking for?


Northing that would make sense to you. Silly, technical stuff, of interest only to real investigators--you know, detonator caps, bits of wiring, chemicl signatures on the steel, audio records, videos showing a simultaneous series of blasts, etc.



Only if it was a normal demo, This was an emergency situation. Plus the building was already in a bad state.


Your fellow frauds pretend that it wasn't in a bad shape. Shouldn't you people coordinate your lies a little better?
 
...says the person that cannot bshow proof a burning 40+ story building has ever been "pulled" before.
 
Charges can be muffeled with sand bags.

No. I'm sorry, no they can't. Have you ever been to a real demolition event? Not only can the blast be heard for MILES, but it can also be FELT. A building demolition produces seismic shockwaves the travel through ground and air alike and are capable of shattering the windows of nearby buildings. No amount of "sand bags" is going to muffle that.

Congrats on your Stundie nomination, idiot.

What were they looking for?

Anything. Anything that would indicate the presence of explosives. Nothing was found-not det cords, not remains of bombs, not your magical "sand bags"-nada. Zip. Zero. Nothing.

Only if it was a normal demo, This was an emergency situation. Plus the building was already in a bad state.

So you're saying that people set up demolition charges inside a burning building in a matter of mere hours?


...Oh, sorry. They didn't have to set up demolition charges--according to you, they had to set up demolition charges AND magical sand bags.
 

Back
Top Bottom