So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

ULTIMA1 said:
So please explain if the firemen were out of the buidling and behind the collapse zone before the call how could the fire commander pull them out?

How do you pull out firemen who are already out of the building?
Click to expand...


If I tell you a thousand times that you have no idea if the men had been pulled BEFORE the call was made, or during, or after, what are the chances that anything will sink in?

Silverstein was informed that operations were being suspended. Does that mean that operations were ALREADY suspended, or they were in the PROCESS of being suspended, or they were ABOUT TO BE suspended?

I DON'T KNOW, YOU DON'T KNOW--POSSIBLY ONLY THE FIRE CHIEF WHO MADE THE CALL KNOWS.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well with a building that is already damage it would not take much.

Such as a couple beams cut and small kicker charges placed.

But that is just 1 of several ways to do it.
Click to expand...

Behold, the full retreat of the 9/11 truth movement.

Instead of a building made of kryptonite that could withstand everything, and needed to have a full blown controlled demo done with all the CD bells and whistles, we now have a theory that the building was almost completely gone and only a small push was required to send it over the edge.

Ultimas theory predicts a collapse that would be completely indistinguishable from an otherwise "natural" fire and impact induced collapse.
 
Last edited:
Gavron said:
But no examples, only your theory.
Click to expand...

I can post several but your track record shows you will not accept or admit to them.

Still waiting for an explantion that of how they pulled the firemen out of the buidling when they had already been evacuated.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well with a building that is already damage it would not take much.

Such as a couple beams cut and small kicker charges placed.

But that is just 1 of several ways to do it.
Click to expand...


No, there are no ways to do it. No explosives were used in WTC 7.
 
FineWine said:
If I tell you a thousand times that you have no idea if the men had been pulled BEFORE the call was made, or during, or after, what are the chances that anything will sink in?
Click to expand...

Becasue we have the quote from Chief Nigro that he evacuated the firemen without talking to anyone, THAT INCLUDES ANY OF THE FIRE COMMANDERS. So that would mean the firemen were out of the building before the call.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I can post several but your track record shows you will not accept or admit to them.

Still waiting for an explantion that of how they pulled the firemen out of the buidling when they had already been evacuated.
Click to expand...


are any of your example buildings on fire when this is done? I believe in the Loch Ness Monster, surely I can be convinced by you.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I can post several but your track record shows you will not accept or admit to them.
Click to expand...
Post them anyway... I'll read them and if I have any reason to doubt them I'll more than happily explain why.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I can post several but your track record shows you will not accept or admit to them.
Click to expand...

Liar.

You have never once posted an example of someone "pulling" a 40+ story burning building, on any forums.

Why must you lie? I thought you wanted the truth, Roger?

:bs:
 
Kiddo, in your expert, pretend NSA opinion, why has Daniel Nigro and the FDNY (oh that's right according to you he wasn't in the FDNY on 9/11) been covering up their decision to destroy WTC7 for the past seven and a half years?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I can post several but your track record shows you will not accept or admit to them.

Still waiting for an explantion that of how they pulled the firemen out of the buidling when they had already been evacuated.
Click to expand...


A fire chief makes a courtesy call to the building owner informing him that efforts to save his building are being halted. Water isn't available to fight the fires. The owner agrees, saying that in view of the terrible loss of life so far, probably the smartest thing is just to pull "it," the rescue operation.

Nobody is talking about demolition. The subject is not to be found in the brief conversation.
 
dtugg said:
Kiddo, in your expert, pretend NSA opinion, why has Daniel Nigro and the FDNY (oh that's right according to you he wasn't in the FDNY on 9/11) been covering up their decision to destroy WTC7 for the past seven and a half years?
Click to expand...

Why don't you do some research and find out.

I have sent my FOIA requests today.
 
Prove me wrong then, ROger.

Post your evidence of a 40+ story burning building being pulled, before or after 9/11.

We know you cant...
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Where is your proof that no explosives were used?
Click to expand...

No very loud bangs were recorded immediately preceding the collapse. All explosives make very loud bangs, no exceptions. Therefore, there were no explosives.

So how did the FDNY "pull" WTC7. Do you think that firefighters went in there and physically cut columns?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom