So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

ULTIMA1 said:
NO, Since i am not pretend NSA.

But since i am real NSA i can provide several statements from the fire chiefs and fire commander that support my statement.
Click to expand...

Actually, all you can provide are your interpretations of these statements. The evidence that the "pulling" of WTC7 actually took place, along with the explanation for why everyone involved decided to lie about it, is as non-existent as your NSA analyst credentials.
 
I think Silverstein must have evicted the lot of them for non-payment at some point, and this is their pathetic attempt at retribution.
 
RedIbis said:
Proving once again that it's almost always debunkers who use this kind of langauge. And no, I don't care if you think you were being sarcastic.
Click to expand...

Which actually is totally off the subject that you have made it apparent that you believe, against all reason and evidence, that Silverstein actually confessed to having his own buildings blown up on 911. Rational people perplexed by this position sometimes suggest antisemitism may be involved. They may be wrong, they may be right, they may be wrong about some truthers and right about others.

Either way, there's got to be SOME reason you, a probably otherwise intelligent person, would buy into that ludicrous theory.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
NO, Since i am not pretend NSA.

But since i am real NSA i can provide several statements from the fire chiefs and fire commander that support my statement.
Click to expand...
Where did they pull it to, and with what did they pull it with?

Is this in another CRITIC of talk from the NSA?
 
twinstead said:
Which actually is totally off the subject that you have made it apparent that you believe, against all reason and evidence, that Silverstein actually confessed to having his own buildings blown up on 911. Rational people perplexed by this position sometimes suggest antisemitism may be involved. They may be wrong, they may be right, they may be wrong about some truthers and right about others.

Either way, there's got to be SOME reason you, a probably otherwise intelligent person, would buy into that ludicrous theory.
Click to expand...

Cant be antisemitism in Redibis case. It's self loathing.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The Fire commander and emergency incident command decided to pull building 7.
Click to expand...

Really? The fire and incident commander made the decision to blow up WTC7?

You are saying the decision was made on that day (there's no incident commander until there is an incident).

The 23 story Hudson building in Detroit was taken by a 20 man crew after 7 months of preparations.

So 7 months times 20 working days per month, times 10 hours per day times 20 men equals twenty-eight THOUSAND man-hours of labor to take down that building.

But WTC7 is twice the height of JL Hudson so the real figure to take down WTC7 is fifty-six thousand man hours.

So here you are on 9/11, it's early afternoon, you have two hours "warning" in which you need to fully prep a 47 story building. To do 56,000 man-hours of work in just two hours you need 28,000 men.

You are basically saying the NWO or the MIB or the ASPCA or the Harper Valley PTA or whoever had 28,000 men standing around outside WTC7 ready to charge in and plant demo-packs.

And you wonder why we think you people are stupid and insane?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
... i can provide several statements from the fire chiefs and fire commander that support my statement.
Click to expand...

But you cannot show one single instance before of after 9/11 of a fire dept "pulling" a still burning 40+ story building.

Please, show us your sources for this, Roger.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Silverstein had no authority to do anything that day.

The Fire commander and emergency incident command decided to pull building 7.
Click to expand...


No, you hopeless ****, it is not possible to "pull" a 47-story building. The term has nothing to do with explosives, as conceivably even you know.
The fire chiefs decided to "pull" their men, "pull" being a term used by firefighters, not demolition experts.
 
RedIbis said:
Pardalis asked me a direct question, I answered it.
Click to expand...


You complimented me on asking a sincere question. Unfortunately, you refused to answer it and ran away.
Assuming you are not an anti-Semite, what accounts for your bizarre obsession with Larry Silverstein? You characterized his matter-of-fact agreement with a fire chief's assessment as "nonsensical" and "dishonest." I fail to see how his statement could be either. What do you think Silverstein did?
 
Back to Silverstein.

How much money has he lost since 9-11, by not collecting rent and other fees from the WTC?

Does anyone know?
 
FineWine said:
The fire chiefs decided to "pull" their men, "pull" being a term used by firefighters, not demolition experts.
Click to expand...

Wrong again.

Fire chiefs and later fire commander stated firefighters were out of the building BEFORE the call to Silverstein.

How could the fire chiefs pull the firefighters if they were already out of the buidling as they all stated?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom