So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

Whatever... I don't really care whether he was associating that devil comment with the "government" or teh "j0000z" the same thought line originating from the intentional misrepresentation of a single quote Silverstein made, which clearly from its context had nothing to do with demolition is the same. Teh "j000000z" handle just lends as a bonus for the antisemites that love using that handle to implicate him more than just the government inside job crap.
 
RedIbis said:
Proving once again that it's almost always debunkers who use this kind of langauge. And no, I don't care if you think you were being sarcastic.
Click to expand...

RedIbis said:
I don't see any "filthy Jew" type comment in what he posted. Do you?
Click to expand...

And I don't see where Larry Silverstein said "I blew up WTC7 for the insurance money". Nor do I see where anyone who witnessed the collapse of WTC7 said "It was a controlled demolition". But that doesn't stop you, and other Truthers, from parsing their statements within inches of their lives in order to torture some sinister inference from them.

Why the double standard?

While I don't necessarily believe you are an anti-Semite, I've yet to see you offer a reason why you despise Larry Silverstain so much, or of what precisely you think he is guilty. So I see no problem with attributing anti-Semitism to someone who has an unexplained, irrational hatred of a Jewish person.

If this is problematic for you, you can either offer a reasonable explanation for your opinion of Silverstein, or at the very least, stop behaving like such a pompous hypocrite.
 
johnny karate said:
And I don't see where Larry Silverstein said "I blew up WTC7 for the insurance money". Nor do I see where anyone who witnessed the collapse of WTC7 said "It was a controlled demolition". But that doesn't stop you, and other Truthers, from parsing their statements within inches of their lives in order to torture some sinister inference from them.

Why the double standard?

While I don't necessarily believe you are an anti-Semite, I've yet to see you offer a reason why you despise Larry Silverstain so much, or of what precisely you think he is guilty. So I see no problem with attributing anti-Semitism to someone who has an unexplained, irrational hatred of a Jewish person.

If this is problematic for you, you can either offer a reasonable explanation for your opinion of Silverstein, or at the very least, stop behaving like such a pompous hypocrite.
Click to expand...

I guess I shouldn't be surprised to get such comedy from a clown.
 
Travis said:
Okay.:rolleyes:

That settles that..
Click to expand...

From the articles that have been posted, have you gained new insight into Larry's reluctance to invest any of his own money into the rebuilding of the towers, relying entirely on public money and outside investments?

Or do you still think he'll go broke attempting to rebuild the towers?
 
RedIbis said:
I guess I shouldn't be surprised to get such comedy from a clown.
Click to expand...

And I'm not at all surprised to get such evasion from an intellectual coward.

Since you aren't able to mount any kind of argument regarding the actual topic of this thread, please continue derailing it into oblivion with your tedious semantic argument. Your colossal failure to ever say anything of substance is a constant source of amusement.
 
johnny karate said:
And I'm not at all surprised to get such evasion from an intellectual coward.

Since you aren't able to mount any kind of argument regarding the actual topic of this thread, please continue derailing it into oblivion with your tedious semantic argument. Your colossal failure to ever say anything of substance is a constant source of amusement.
Click to expand...

I think the post just above yours is right on point. I know you prefer vitriol to discourse, but you might attempt to address the question I asked.
 
RedIbis said:
From the articles that have been posted, have you gained new insight into Larry's reluctance to invest any of his own money into the rebuilding of the towers, relying entirely on public money and outside investments?
Click to expand...

Why do insist on lying about things you've already been caught lying about? (And in the same thread no less!)
 
RedIbis said:
I think the post just above yours is right on point. I know you prefer vitriol to discourse, but you might attempt to address the question I asked.
Click to expand...

I already did. Twice.

Here:
johnny karate said:
Larry Silverstein owes the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $10 million a month in rent.

Without new buildings on the site from which to lease office space, Silverstein has no way to recoup that $10 million a month.

$10 million per month X an indeterminate amount of time = eventually broke.
Click to expand...


And here:
johnny karate said:
Will Silverstein be destitute and on the street? Probably not.

But he does stand to take a huge loss on WTC, which makes his involvement in any conspiracy to destroy those buidlings patently absurd. Which is the point of this thread.
Click to expand...


But as per your usual modus operandi, you ignore answers and just keep asking the same questions over and over. The issue of Silverstein literally "going broke" has been addressed. Now how about you address the actual topic of the thread?


RedIbis said:
I know you prefer vitriol to discourse
Click to expand...

RedIbis said:
I guess I shouldn't be surprised to get such comedy from a clown.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
So Bloomberg is lying too?
Click to expand...

Nope. Just you.

What you said:
RedIbis said:
From the articles that have been posted, have you gained new insight into Larry's reluctance to invest any of his own money into the rebuilding of the towers, relying entirely on public money and outside investments?
Click to expand...


The truth:
The agreement will bring to about $4.55 billion the total insurance proceeds Silverstein and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey will receive.

Silverstein, the leaseholder on the World Trade Center, had battled with insurance companies in federal court since a month after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks over how much the policies were worth. The settlement gives the developer and the Port Authority, the site's owner, the cash to help rebuild the 16- acre property.
Click to expand...
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
It's a little disturbing watching RedIbis smear his mind-bogglingly irrational disgust for Silverstein all over the place. Like a monkey that's got nothing to play with except his own poo...




He's a "filthy Jew". He has all the money in the world. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I see that Kreel chimed in right on cue just as you said. Post #35

"Give that man a million!"
 
RedIbis said:
I don't see any "filthy Jew" type comment in what he posted. Do you?
Click to expand...

Kreel:

"Larry will never go broke. He sold his soul to the devil.

Oh, yeah, he may look down and out, living in the gutter, barfing on his loafers. Don't worry. Larry is just waiting. "

You see nothing wrong with this comment?
 
16.5 said:
Now, now, now Silverstein doid not "pull" the buildings.

He told the FDNY to pull the buildings.
Click to expand...

Silverstein had no authority to do anything that day.

The Fire commander and emergency incident command decided to pull building 7.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Silverstein had no authority to do anything that day.

The Fire commander and emergency incident command decided to pull building 7.
Click to expand...

Can you provide a pretend NSA document to confirm this imaginary event?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom