Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

Status
Not open for further replies.


You post a link to a crackpot source that has zero credibility. Nobody in the engineering community has found any problems with the Purdue simulation. So George Bush controlled every agency in the federal government from top to bottom? And nobody ever leaked a thing? Right.

The Astanheh team's work, which destroys you frauds completely, is a subject you will of course avoid.
 
Then you should copy these threads and take them to your local prosecutor. I'm sure that when you tell him you have info from anonymous posters on an internet forum he will jump at the chance to prosecute. (show him some videos and you're sure to convince him).

How can you prosecute without a criminal investigation?:confused:
 
So do we- just not the same terrorists you believe in.

But your problem is that "our" terrorists are real people. You know, radical Islamists who remain extremely proud of their victory. Your "terrorists" are ordinary politicians who miraculously acquired super-powers.
 
But your problem is that "our" terrorists are real people. You know, radical Islamists who remain extremely proud of their victory. Your "terrorists" are ordinary politicians who miraculously acquired super-powers.

I wouldn't make the mistake of ever calling the neocons 'ordinary politicians'. If you want to believe that good luck to you.
 
... and specialist in structural damage analysis...

No he isn't. Heiwa used to be a maritime insurance assessor. That is, if there was a fire in the ship's galley, Heiwa would be your man to assess the payout. If a ship scraped the quayside, ditto.

Check his CV.
 
I wouldn't make the mistake of ever calling the neocons 'ordinary politicians'. If you want to believe that good luck to you.


Your "neocons" are long gone. Nothing you frauds predicted came true. As Nick Nolte says at the end of "48 Hrs.": You're done.
 
You're right. I'm wasting time on blather when their muddle-headed guru should be explaining the magic that allows only one floor of the collapsing mass to contact the next floor. What DOES happen to all that mass above the bottom part of the collapsing mass?

Apparently Heiwa thinks it should just sit there and bounce like a volley ball, and people Like Kreel and bill think that the moment the upper section begins to come apart that mass magially disappears. I sense something similr in Heiwa too :eye-poppi
 
Apparently Heiwa thinks it should just sit there and bounce like a volley ball, and people Like Kreel and bill think that the moment the upper section begins to come apart that mass magially disappears. I sense something similr in Heiwa too :eye-poppi



I can't get a straight answer from them. Let's say fifteen floors collapse. They seem to be saying that the lowest floor impacts the next floor in line and the other fourteen do what? Float in midair? One of them was trying to pretend that as the floors get crushed, they somehow have less mass. That must have sounded stupid even to a "truther," as he hasn't attempted to defend it.
 
I can't get a straight answer from them. Let's say fifteen floors collapse. They seem to be saying that the lowest floor impacts the next floor in line and the other fourteen do what? Float in midair? One of them was trying to pretend that as the floors get crushed, they somehow have less mass. That must have sounded stupid even to a "truther," as he hasn't attempted to defend it.

Heiwa seems to think that "friction" between the debris and the exterior columns should halt the collapse while the columns "shred" the floors... But what he misses is that the entire load application changes if that happens, instead of the normal vertical loading the columns would undergo axial loading in a fashion where they have substially less capacity... Dunno if that's how he's still arguing... but then again, most of his posts are little more than jibberish....
 
Heiwa seems to think that "friction" between the debris and the exterior columns should halt the collapse while the columns "shred" the floors... But what he misses is that the entire load application changes if that happens, instead of the normal vertical loading the columns would undergo axial loading in a fashion where they have substially less capacity... Dunno if that's how he's still arguing... but then again, most of his posts are little more than jibberish....


Laying aside the question about how vertical columns "shred" an amorphous falling mass, does he notice that the videos do not support his fairy tale? He would be forced to claim that explosives helped the collapse to progress, but there are no sounds of explosives going off and no physical evidence of their use. He will, of course, rave incoherently and wave away those inconveniences. Nevertheless, simulations produced by Berkeley and Purdue show the collapses occurring exactly as they did in reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom