no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[ULTIMA1]

These from the first page?

WOW one whole part, where is the report that matches it to the plane?

 

[A W Smith]

The offical story was not on trial was it?

I am talking about the evidence you have for the official story would not hold up in court now as real evidence, in fact it probably be laughed out of court.

what was Zacarias Moussaoui convicted of?

conspiring to hijack planes and crash them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

So...?

Has anyone shown how serial numbers were used to identify any of the 9/11 planes?

How about just flight 77? The topic of this thread.

You know what? That was really rude of me. Since I am already positive that none of you can provide any.

I'm sorry.

Does it hurt?

 

[Gavron]

I am talking about the evidence you have for the official story would not hold up in court now as real evidence, in fact it probably be laughed out of court.

It was used in the Moussaoui trial, and was real evidence. The courts used them and got a guilty verdict.

Unless you are saying that NONE of the evidece used in the trial was from the events on 9/11.

Is that what you are trying to say?

 

[ULTIMA1]

So why do you think the serial numbers aren't available to the general public?

Thats a good queston. They should be becasue there is nothing classified or any trail going on or planned.

 

[FineWine]

Yes, because as we all know, if it ain't on youtube, or in front of us, it doesn't exist!
Mine...and, Stundied!


[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/109234699fe7de0c94.gif[/qimg][qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/109234699fe7de0c94.gif[/qimg][qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/109234699fe7de0c94.gif[/qimg]

Actually, Ultima1 breaks new ground for "truthers." He can deny what is right under his nose.

 

[Arus808]

Many witnesses saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

http://web.archive.org/web/20050306125425/http://eric.bart.free.fr/iwpb/witness.html
http://www.geocities.com/someguyyoudontknow33/witnesses.htm
http://mouv4x8.club.fr/11Sept01/A0082_b_They saw the aircraft.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/sgydk.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20070114...newamerican.com/tna/2004/08-23-2004/facts.htm

 

[ULTIMA1]

Is that what you are trying to say?

I am saying that any half decent lawyer could tear up that supposed evidence in court.

As you agree we still do not have most of the evidence or reports.

 

[A W Smith]

I am not wasting my time since you will not post anythign i ask for.

That's because we caught Roger Misner in another lie. Hows it feel being backed into that corner Roger?

 

[Grizzly Bear]

WOW one whole part, where is the report that matches it to the plane?

I dunno how much you want... there are multiple facets of evidence ranging from the passenger remains, to the aircraft parts, to the plane not reaching its destination... and a multitude of other areas from which the identification can be derived without every single serial number... perfection don't exist in the natural world buddy.

 

[FineWine]

So...?

Has anyone shown how serial numbers were used to identify any of the 9/11 planes?

How about just flight 77? The topic of this thread.

You know what? That was really rude of me. Since I am already positive that none of you can provide any.

I'm sorry.

Does it hurt?

Apathoid is a real avionics tech. He asked a series of questions about serial numbers. What were your answers?

 

[apathoid]

WOW one whole part, where is the report that matches it to the plane?

Can you find me the serial number of a part from TWA800? And then find the report on it that matches it to the plane? How about ValuJet 592, Swissair 111, AA 587? If not, why not? Are those inside jobs too?

Just find me one example where this has been done in the past. It's a reasonable request to make, if indeed the NTSB is required to do so by law.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Many witnesses saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

1. Witnesses are the most unreliable evidence.

2. Witness also stated they did not know what the Pentagon they were told later it was a 757.

 

[Shalamar]

so...?

Has anyone shown how serial numbers were used to identify any of the 9/11 planes?

How about just flight 77? The topic of this thread.

You know what? That was really rude of me. Since i am already positive that none of you can provide any.

I'm sorry.

Does it hurt?

omg! No planes!

 

[Arus808]

Roger has made 234 posts since 4:30 pm today, just under eight hours. The forum software only lets you post once a minute, so the maximum number of posts possible is only about 450. Now THAT'S dedication. Or something.

which only proves that he is not an NSA analyst

 

[Shalamar]

Many witnesses saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

1. Witnesses are the most unreliable evidence.

2. Witness also stated they did not know what the Pentagon they were told later it was a 757.

Where is your evidence that something other than a plane hit the pentagon?

Show the evidence to back your claim.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Can you find me the serial number of a part from TWA800? And then find the report on it that matches it to the plane?

Yes, i probably can since most of the evidence and reports have been released. If not i am sure i can find it through a FOIA request.

 

[TJM]

So...?

Has anyone shown how serial numbers were used to identify any of the 9/11 planes?

How about just flight 77? The topic of this thread.

You know what? That was really rude of me. Since I am already positive that none of you can provide any.

I'm sorry.

Does it hurt?

Of cousre not. We've come to expect nothing substantial from you to begin with.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Where is your evidence that something other than a plane hit the pentagon?

Show the evidence to back your claim.

I did not say something else hit the Pentagon. Stop putting words in my mouth.

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Has anyone shown how serial numbers were used to identify any of the 9/11 planes?

Unnecessary, since the identity of the planes has never been in question. The fact that they never arrived at their destination should have been the first clue. The only instance that I believe it'd be neccessary is at the WTC site post-collapse. And I'd be very surprised if any serial numbers were even intact at WTC to differentiate one plane from the other.

You know what? That was really rude of me. Since I am already positive that none of you can provide any.

In the case of the fragmented part above, the serial number is pretty visible. This photo's been circulating the internet for years now, and there's no reason not to assume it's genuine unless you know something we don't.

Are you looking for an itemized list of serial numbers in CSS/HTML format for you to click on? Or would Flash be better for you?

Either way, if they're not releasable by FOIA, there's gotta be a reason for it covered under the nine exemptions to the Act.

Does it hurt?

About as much as not being able to examine bullet fragments and ballistic trajectory calculations from the VT Massacre. And that doesn't do any thing to shake my belief that Seung-Hui Cho was responsible for it - just like not being able to see an itemized list of every single recovered serial number really doesn't do much to shake my belief that American Airlines Flight 77 was flown into the Pentagon.