• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread AA77 FBI Investigation [split from: AA77 FDR Data, Explained]

I dare you to shut me up by posting the following.

Show me where in post 284 it states the start and end of the crime scene investigation and proves my sources wrong.
 
Even though your source does specifically state when it ended, the other sources state when it began on 9/11/01. Taking juristiction does not indicate the start. Period. It starts when they arrive on scene and start looking for evidence.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I dare you to shut me up by posting the following.

Show me where in post 284 it states the start and end of the crime scene investigation and proves my sources wrong.
Click to expand...


I acknowledge that you are impossible to shut up. We can all see that the FBI was very busy within hours of the attack on the Pentagon. You are left with precisely nothing. It would be better for everyone if you continued this debate with yourself.
 
FineWine said:
I acknowledge that you are impossible to shut up. We can all see that the FBI was very busy within hours of the attack on the Pentagon. You are left with precisely nothing. It would be better for everyone if you continued this debate with yourself.[/QUOTE]

Amen
Click to expand...
 
ULTIMA 1 and you too KreeL

ULTIMA1 said:
I dare you to shut me up by posting the following.

Show me where in post 284 it states the start and end of the crime scene investigation and proves my sources wrong.
Click to expand...

FineWine
I acknowledge that you are impossible to shut up. We can all see that the FBI was very busy within hours of the attack on the Pentagon. You are left with precisely nothing. It would be better for everyone if you continued this debate with yourself.

1. CTs ignore facts that contradict what they wish to believe.
2. CTs lack an alternative integrated explanation of the 9/11 events.
3. CTs hold these bizarre ideas with absolute conviction.
4. CTs hold these false beliefs based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what constitutes irrefutable evidence to the contrary.

This is described by psychiatry as a Delusion, a pathological belief.

From Wiki:

"Delusions typically occur in the context of neurological or mental illness, although they are not tied to any particular disease and have been found to occur in the context of many pathological states (both physical and mental). However, they are of particular diagnostic importance in psychotic disorders and particularly in schizophrenia, paraphrenia and mania in episodes of bipolar disorder. "

"You can't reason someone out of something he was never reasoned into." - Swift

http://tinyurl.com/4slrf
 
FineWine said:
What do you take us for? Seriously. The FBI was on the scene but they were standing with their thumbs up their... Give us a break, dude! Is there anything too downright stupid for you people? You wasted a whole thread trying to prove that the FBI did nothing for ten days?!?!

From the book "Pentagon 9/11" (page 170):

On the 12th the FBI and the DPS [Defense Protective Service] quickly removed from the west side of the building anyone who was not fighting the fire or doing search and rescue work. As people returned, they were screened and given color-coded plastic wrist bands provided by the Arlington police; the supply of 2,000 bands was soon exhausted."

"The following day DPS used its photo identification computer system to make badges, but the large number processed caused the unit to burn out. Finally the DPS and the FBI procured from the Secret Service five mobile stations that mass-produced phot badges."

On page 103, under "Operational Coordination," we learn that "The evening of the 11th the FBI announced plans to set up a Joint Operations Center (JOC) at the Fort Myer Community Center that all responding federal agencies could use to facilitate their assistance to local entities. The FBI also planned to run its criminal investiagtion from the JOC."

In the section on "Removing Remains" (starting page 120), we learn that "It fell therefore to FBI agents and photographers to record the location and condition and photograph the human remains, and for members of the 3rd Infantry Regiment--the Old Gurad, of Fort Myer--and on the first day a group of Marines, to carry bodies to the morgue set up on the grounds outside."

"A body recovery team typically consisted of one or more FBI agents, one or two FEMA representatives, a photgrapher, and four body or litter carriers from the Old Guard. For the recovery work the FBI drafted Navy and Marine photographers already on the scene taking pictures of the impact site and pieces of evidence strewn as far away as Arlington Cemetery. Inside the building, body recovery teams followed the trail of the earlier teams that had spray-painted a door or remaining column or panel with an orange fluorescent X. In the top quadrant of the X appeared the initials of the team that had cleared the room, on the right the number of bodies believed to be there, and in the other quadrants a code to indicate the location of the body. The agents created a numbering system, noted the condition of the dead, and chalked the number on a slate as an identifier code. The photgraphers recorded the scene, including wide-angle and close-up shots of the bodies in the positions found, along with the crime scene designation numbers. After debris was lifted away, bodies and body parts were photographed from several angles, including close-ups of faces to aid identification."

I'm not going to reproduce pages 178-83, "Identifying the Dead," but anyone who reads this material will come away convinced that TAM was right about you people. Vile doesn't begin to cover depraved nonsense you promote. You have no idea of what you're talking about, but you cheerfully make up outrageous lies.
Click to expand...
This is a better source than 911 failed opinion holders use; it will be ignored. This post is also too long for the "911 failed idea pushers" to comprehend and draw rational conclusions. It could take months to quote mine this information and mess up 911 more.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Wrong yet again. The FBI handed the crime scene back over on the morning of Sept. 26 so that does not count as a day.
Click to expand...

Then it ended on the 25th and not the 26th, if no investigating was done on the 26th. So it's Sept. 21-25.

Thanks for proving you can't debate me with facts and evidence. Too bad you're not mature enough to debate me with facts and evidence.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
This is a better source than 911 failed opinion holders use; it will be ignored. This post is also too long for the "911 failed idea pushers" to comprehend and draw rational conclusions. It could take months to quote mine this information and mess up 911 more.
Click to expand...

Not to mention we have the statements of many of the individuals directly involved in the investigation. U1 has not had time to go through a small fraction of those and yet still continues with his rants.
 
lapman said:
It starts when they arrive on scene and start looking for evidence.
Click to expand...


At least you can admit to the end time.

Now all you have to do is admit that my sources show the start date of the crime scene investigation.
 
beachnut said:
This is a better source than 911 failed opinion holders use; it will be ignored. This post is also too long for the "911 failed idea pushers" to comprehend and draw rational conclusions. It could take months to quote mine this information and mess up 911 more.
Click to expand...


Mince said:
Too bad you're not mature enough to debate me with facts and evidence.
Click to expand...

911files said:
Not to mention we have the statements of many of the individuals directly involved in the investigation. U1 has not had time to go through a small fraction of those and yet still continues with his rants.
Click to expand...



My facts and evidence speaks for itself and you still have not debated my sources.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
My facts and evidence speaks for itself and you still have not debated my sources.
Click to expand...
Yes your facts and evidence speak volumes.






The news stories (NEWS STORIES) you posted prove you to be incompetent at investigating this topic.
You took your hearsay stories and forgot to apply logic and knowledge with some sound judgment to make a valid conclusions. You have a one track diluted conclusion which you try to make a smoking gun issue but have only a failed junk idea not applicable to anything.

You think you have facts from news sources but you have hearsay.
 
Last edited:
Poor Roger...

I'm providing information which proves your conspiracy theories wrong. Complete information, not "cherry picked" lines. Everyone can read my proof. Proof that can be used in a court of law.

Don't be so closed minded, Roger

Win win!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom