• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread AA77 FBI Investigation [split from: AA77 FDR Data, Explained]

U1 loves to point out how long the FBI had jurisdiction over the crime scene as if that is the only time they were doing any type of on scene investigation. The fact is that the number of days they spent at the scene is meaningless. It's the evidence they gathered is what counts.

He also seems to neglect the fact that many other investigative services were also working the scene in a support capacity.
 
He also seems to neglect the fact that many other investigative services were also working the scene in a support capacity.
Obviously, to him, that's irrelevant. He has a new straw to hold on to for dear life.
 
Just too bad i have posted 2 sources that support what i posted and can post more.

Still waiting for someone to show those sources wrong.
Who would say this with a straight face.

A great source and Ultima1 has us trapped by his superior "sources".
Too bad he has posted 2 sources! NA NA NANA And he can post more!
He is so superior, He posted 2 sources and has more of that reporter hearsay junk to come.

Is this proof he is an NSA analyst who creates reports about what they hear and read, not what is real. I was going to tell him the sources don't mean anything because the FBI was investigation 911 at the Pentagon right after the impact and the continued for a long time. After the impact area was investigated and they finished they moved another area at the Pentagon; but he missed they had many people who are not FBI doing tasks to complete their report.

With zero meaning off-topic spawned thread a failure; I have learned and grasped how big the investigation was. They had photographers from the military, they had the DoD, they had people who cared because his terrorist friends he apologize for killed their Friends; and he makes light of it by exposing his failed logic and complete lack of knowledge of everything real. Does he has more lies and failed sources? Yes he said he does! He has failed and wants to prove it by failing more. A persistent cult member never stops, never says die, save the terrorists he apologizes for with his superior "sources"; his "sources" - the news? "filtered sources".

Recommend logic therapy and some rational thought exercises.

Dewey won! I have more sources! NA NA NANA
 
Last edited:
Who would say this with a straight face.

A great source and Ultima1 has us trapped by his superior "sources".
Too bad he has posted 2 sources! NA NA NANA And he can post more!
He is so superior, He posted 2 sources and has more of that reporter hearsay junk to come.

Is this proof he is an NSA analyst who creates reports about what they hear and read, not what is real. I was going to tell him the sources don't mean anything because the FBI was investigation 911 at the Pentagon right after the impact and the continued for a long time. After the impact area was investigated and they finished they moved another area at the Pentagon; but he missed they had many people who are not FBI doing tasks to complete their report.

With zero meaning off-topic spawned thread a failure; I have learned and grasped how big the investigation was. They had photographers from the military, they had the DoD, they had people who cared because his terrorist friends he apologize for killed their Friends; and he makes light of it by exposing his failed logic and complete lack of knowledge of everything real. Does he has more lies and failed sources? Yes he said he does! He has failed and wants to prove it by failing more. A persistent cult member never stops, never says die, save the terrorists he apologizes for with his superior "sources"; his "sources" - the news? "filtered sources".

Recommend logic therapy and some rational thought exercises.

Dewey won! I have more sources! NA NA NANA

I'm eagerly awaiting Ultima1's next source of shocking, smoking gun information from uboob or Mr Masden. Dont give up on him folks - who else passes the time whilst clipping the nails:D
 
Last edited:
The sources are not wrong, your assertions regarding them are wrong because you don't understand the meaning of the terminology used and/or omit other information in the sources.

Thanks for agreeing the sources psoted are correct, and no the assertions regarding them are not wrong. FACTS are FACTS.

As for me, I have already provided ample evidence to prove you wrong, but you ignore it. So have a nice tin-foil life Ultima, I am done here.

WRONG, you hav enot psoted any evidence to show the sources i posted wrong.

As far as a tin foil hat, i would rather that then the special ed helmets the believers wear.
 
Wrong buddy! That's 6 days!

Day 1: Sept. 21
Day 2: Sept. 22
Day 3: Sept. 23
Day 4: Sept. 24
Day 5: Sept. 25
Day 6: Sept. 26

Wrong yet again. The FBI handed the crime scene back over on the morning of Sept. 26 so that does not count as a day.
 
Last edited:
U1 loves to point out how long the FBI had jurisdiction over the crime scene as if that is the only time they were doing any type of on scene investigation.


As proven by the sources that FBI only spent 5 days working the crime scene.
 
WRONG, you hav enot psoted any evidence to show the sources i posted wrong.

I think the last 2 pages have show "enot psoted" information showing that you only cherry pick information from posts. If it does not go along with your conspiracy theory, you ignore it completely. :rolleyes:
 
As proven by the sources that FBI only spent 5 days working the crime scene.
False. It was shown by sources that they worked the crime scene longer, but only took juristiction over the site for 5 days. That is not the same as the investigation started on that day. Either way, you have yet to prove that it wasn't enough time. You keep running away from that.
 
If it does not go along with your conspiracy theory, you ignore it completely.


So fun and easy to prove you wrong with facts.

Fact: The Defenselink site proves that the FBI only worked the crime scene investiagtion for 5 days.

Please show me a source that debates this.
 
A source that debates that? How about that very same link. It states the FBI moved to the north parking lot and continued to sift thru debris for evidence.

Haha!

Oh....and post #284

:dl:
 
Last edited:
Why do you keep running away from the fact that sources show that the FBI only worked the crime scene investigation at the Pentagon for 5 days?
Why do you keep running away from the fact that it does not show that. It only shows when they took jurisdiction. What do you think the FBI was doing for 10 days at the site?
 
Last edited:
A source that debates that? How about that very same link. It states the FBI moved to the north parking lot and continued to sift thru debris for evidence.

Fun and easy to prove you wrong again.

Where does it state about still working the crime scene investigation ?

The site has already stated the crime scene investigation was ended on the morning of Sept 26 when handed back over to the military.
 
Maybe you should read post #284, Roger.

That post should answer your question.
 
It only shows when they took jurisdiction. What do you thing the FBI was doing for 10 days at the site?

Yes that means when they took jursidiction was when they actually started working the crime scene, as sources show.

Maybe the FBI was waitng for 10 days for the rescue and recovery effort, and the EPA to clear the site.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom