Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate

leftysergeant said:
Well, the fact that the bodies found with it match those reportedly on the identified aircraft proves it better than anything about the wreckage itself.
Click to expand...

I did not ask about bodies, i asked for proof the wheel is from AA77.





No, it isn't. That is just what one man saw at the very bottom of the fire. We could, at the same time, see roaring flames coming from floors just a few flights up from where Palmer was. Do stop and consider what things mean before you coment on them.[/QUOTE]
 
Why are we entertaining Ultima's fantasies here? He can go on and on about the wheel found in the Pentagon all he wants, but the fact remains that the FDR and ATC radar data places the jet there. Regardless of any identification that was or wasn't done to the wheel, other evidence clearly demonstrates that it was FL77 that hit.

There is no doubt about this. So why engage Ultima in his obsfucation? It doesn't matter what he says about the wheel because the wheel wasn't used to determine what hit the Pentagon. Rather, it's being used to drive the point home (i.e. 'We have the radar data, we have the FDR, we have witness statements, we have in flight calls... look, there's even a wheel there. Given all the other evidence, where would the wheel have come from?'...). The wheel is an "icing on the cake" photo, not a primary piece of evidence. It's part of the cumulation of evidence, it doesn't stand alone. And we've already tried to teach Ultima about the concept of convergence of evidence; he refuses to understand, and maintains that his single points of contention equals the refutation of our understanding of the events of that day. They don't.

Just put him on ignore. There's nothing to be gained by responding to his repetition of falsities and disproven points.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am going by fire fighters and engineers reports.




Yes, and no plane hit building 7.

A plane hit the Empire State building.
Click to expand...
What does ESB have to with WTC?


Energy911.jpg

Why the WTC impacts are not like ESB! Energy; GOT PHYSICS?
 
Last edited:
JoeyDonuts said:
You know what? Normally I'd be more than happy to fill you in on the whole sad story.

But since I respect you and your sanity, I offer this by way of advice. Don't even bother. It's not worth your time, and this particular rabbit hole just goes in a big circle.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your concern.
I shall take your advice and not bother further.:)
 
beachnut said:
What does ESB have to with WTC?
...
Click to expand...

I can answer that; Really, really stupid people cannot imagine that a WW-2 bomber is so very small or flies so slowly as a B-25 does.

They are also so stick-stone-bone stupid that they cannot imagine that ESB and WTC were utterly different in terms of construction, fire resistance, and surplus strength.

Finally, their sense of self-worth is so miniscule that anything that might show they were *gasp* wrong about something threatens them to the core and they can never admit that they got anything wrong.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I did not ask about bodies, i asked for proof the wheel is from AA77.





No, it isn't. That is just what one man saw at the very bottom of the fire. We could, at the same time, see roaring flames coming from floors just a few flights up from where Palmer was. Do stop and consider what things mean before you coment on them.
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]


This should be easy for you to dismiss:

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtml
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Point is they were steel skyscrapers like buildings 1 and 2.
Click to expand...

But they were of an utterly different design, with other materials than steel holding them together. Thus, they are meaningless to the argument.





And yes there has been jets hitting other buildings.
Click to expand...

And every building hit by a jetliner has been utterly destroyed. End of story. Please try again with relevant facts.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I did not ask about bodies, i asked for proof the wheel is from AA77.
Click to expand...

If the identified bodies were last reported to be enroute somewhere with a particular aircraft wheel, an aircraft wheel which arrived at the same location with them, at the same time, can be assumed to be the wheel with which they reportedly departed their last known location.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I love the smell of believers crapping themselves when they cannot come up with evidence to support what they post.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm. This reminds me of something. Ah yes I remember. Did you have a picture of your NSA badge or ID yet? By they way, how have things been over at the NSA?
 
I don't hate any of these photos.

Why should I?

If really meant anything and proved the official conspiracy theory to be true then none of you would be here.

Can I see them again? I mean is there something else to see in 2009?
 
apathoid said:
He has a point. There were...I don't know...200-300... 757s flying on the morning of Sept 11th, how do we know the wheel in question doesnt belong to one of them.

I'm just asking questions. :con2:
Click to expand...

Just guessing here, but would they not have noticed it missing on landing?:)
 
As usual, this thread simply serves to illustrate the point made on the website:

The Lay Scientist said:
Ultimately this sort of blogging is an exercise in futility. There is no evidence, no matter how convincing, that will ever be accepted by the 9/11 "Truth" Movement's hardcore evangelists. The irony is that the people who claim to be searching for the truth are so willing to ignore evidence and react angrily to those with conflicting evidence and testimony.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1, in particular, has shown a classic example of this behaviour.

Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom