Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate

[Alt+F4]

Did they collapse form the debris and fire and how long after the towers went down?

They were both destroyed when the towers fell on them.

 

[ULTIMA1]

They were both destroyed when the towers fell on them.

So they were not like building 7?

 

[Alt+F4]

So they were not like building 7?

They collapsed due to falling debris. So your statement:

"2. Debris did hit building 7 but several other buildings as well. Funny though how building 7 was the only one to collapse due to debris and fire."

is wrong.

 

[leftysergeant]

1. The wheel in that photo is used on other planes besides and 757. No official reports match wheel found to the plane.

Nobody expected to have to list every nut and bolt with a serial number to satisfy the curiousity of a bunch of shrieking psychotics and liars later. There is evidence that a large plane hit the building. There is no evidence that it could have been other than the plane that was identified in the official report.

2. Debris did hit building 7 but several other buildings as well. Funny though how building 7 was the only one to collapse due to debris and fire.

The roofs of the others were stove in, crushed down under the debris. Were they constructed as was WTC 7, not even those little remnants would have been left.

3. See above.

4 and 5. See above.

Ditto.

6. Not much of a plume for a fire and explosion that supposidly destroyed the plane and thorugh an engine core several hundred yards away.

Oh, the stupid just rolls off of this one. Neither you, nor that blithering idiot and all-around waste of skin Killtown nor his buddy Rumpl4skin have a freaking clue how big that plume is, and it would be stupid of any twoofer blathermeister to claim that the fires should have still been burning. Bring some science or stay out of the way.

Scientific fact:

You cannot measure a cloud in the sky from one sample with no object of known size atr the same distance.

7. Do we have a official report that matches the seatbelt to the plane?

The point is that it shows that it was not a Global Hawk or similar ersatz plane that crashed there.

8. Too bad firemen in the building reported only small fires.

Whose undies did you get that statement out of?

9. Thermite could have been produced by the plane.

Care to tell us how? Never happened before.

10. To bad the pieces still hit a lot faster thenb they should have.

Delusional. The 10 figure is how long NIST estimated that it took for impact of debris to produce an identifiable seiusmic signal.

The timing is exactly perfect.

 

[ULTIMA1]

They collapsed due to falling debris. So your statement:

NO they collapsed becasue the buildings fell on them, not becasue of debris.

 

[Panoply_Prefect]

But 1,2 and 7 were the only buildings to completly collapse.

Actually both WTC1 and 2 had a pile of debris several stories high, meaning the clearup meant having to cut it down manually. WTC6 on the other hand hand to be pulled down using cables. So if you want, none of them collapsed completely.

 

[beachnut]

NO they collapsed becasue the buildings fell on them, not becasue of debris.

Wowzer.

What about your other failed ideas will you support them in the near future with evidence?

The wheel, do you have the evidnece to show it was planted? NSA must have something on that; right?

 

[ULTIMA1]

There is evidence that a large plane hit the building.

But no real evidence it was AA77. The wheel in the photo can fit on other planes beside a 757.

Whose undies did you get that statement out of?

That is straight from the radio transcripts from the firemen who were in the building.

 

[ULTIMA1]

The wheel, do you have the evidnece to show it was planted? NSA must have something on that; right?

Pleas show me the report that states the wheel is from AA77.

Or it will prove that you are the one that has never supported his lies with facts.

 

[beachnut]

Pleas show me the report that states the wheel is from AA77.

Or it will prove that you are the one that has never supported his lies with facts.

It is common knowledge oh great NSA person of delusion.

Present evidence it was planted or retract your paranoid dirt dumb lie.\

PROOF: Now you prove it is not proof.

Flight 77 was found in the Pentagon. You can't figure out RADAR data showing it there, or FDR being found there as evidence. Which means you are not a good analyst. Not an analyst at all just a spammer on the Internet with dirt dumb ideas on 911.

The NTSB and the FAA confirm it is the wheel from 77 since no other planes crashed into the Pentagon on 911. Case close you failed as an analyst.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Present evidence it was planted or retract your paranoid dirt dumb lie.

WRONG, you have stated the wheel is from AA77 it is up to you to prove it.

Show actual report that the wheel is from AA77 or admit you do not know what aircraft it is from.

 

[beachnut]

WRONG, you have stated the wheel is from AA77 it is up to you to prove it.

Show actual report that the wheel is from AA77 or admit you do not know what aircraft it is from.

I gave proof it was 77; now you prove it was planted.

You can only talk and repeat lies you never present evidence; just talk.

You have never provided any evidence and you keep talking and posting lies.

Please show how another wheel from another plane got in the Pentagon? Please explain how the FDR which has all the flight time for over 25 hours from 77 is not the FDR from 77 which was seen by people hitting the Pentagon? Do you have anything but your failed talk?

 

[WildCat]

WRONG, you have stated the wheel is from AA77 it is up to you to prove it.

Show actual report that the wheel is from AA77 or admit you do not know what aircraft it is from.

I love the smell of desperate truthers in the afternoon!

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Point is they were steel skyscrapers like buildings 1 and 2.

And you firmly believe that a universal standard can be applied to all of them? And would I be correct to assert that you believe the design specifications mean absolutely nothing to any differences in the ultimate performance of the structures?

No jetliner hit buidling 7. And yes there has been jets hitting other buildings.

Nice cherrypick Ultima. It would do some good to reread the post. I made this a fairly easy task... I did make it obvious when I was speaking of the trade centers 1 & 2, and WTC 7.

You mean to say that there are other examples of skyscrapers having been hit by large commercial jetliners, 80+ stories above street level rendering most standard fire protection mechanisms useless and were built in the same manner as these? You mean to say there are other structures which had a nearby collapse of an even larger building which not only struck it, but also rendered the water supply from the city mains useless for fire suppression? And ignited uncontrolled fires on multiple floors and acting on a similar structural frame?

 

[Toke]

I must have missed something, have ULTIMA1 claimed to work as a analyst in the NSA?
The intelligence thingie?

And post here, as a truther?

 

[JoeyDonuts]

I must have missed something, have ULTIMA1 claimed to work as a analyst in the NSA?
The intelligence thingie?

And post here, as a truther?

You know what? Normally I'd be more than happy to fill you in on the whole sad story.

But since I respect you and your sanity, I offer this by way of advice. Don't even bother. It's not worth your time, and this particular rabbit hole just goes in a big circle.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I love the smell of desperate truthers in the afternoon!

I love the smell of believers crapping themselves when they cannot come up with evidence to support what they post.

 

[leftysergeant]

But no real evidence it was AA77. The wheel in the photo can fit on other planes beside a 757.

Well, the fact that the bodies found with it match those reportedly on the identified aircraft proves it better than anything about the wreckage itself.

That is straight from the radio transcripts from the firemen who were in the building.

No, it isn't. That is just what one man saw at the very bottom of the fire. We could, at the same time, see roaring flames coming from floors just a few flights up from where Palmer was. Do stop and consider what things mean before you coment on them.

 

[Drudgewire]

I must have missed something, have ULTIMA1 claimed to work as a analyst in the NSA?
The intelligence thingie?

And post here, as a truther?

Yes... after failing to convince the world of his credentials at his previous home: The eBaum's World forums.








And yes, I'm serious.

 

[ULTIMA1]

And you firmly believe that a universal standard can be applied to all of them?

I am going by fire fighters and engineers reports.

I did make it obvious when I was speaking of the trade centers 1 & 2, and WTC 7.

Yes, and no plane hit building 7.

A plane hit the Empire State building.