Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

Status
Not open for further replies.
FineWine said:
The part of the building that initially collapses adds more and more mass as the collapse continues. Nothing can possibly arrest it. What don't you get?
Click to expand...

LOL! Now tell, again, how do you do it with the religion?

Nothing can arrest it! LOL!
 
It's remarkable how their faithbased paradigm is so ingrained. Pretty much like having an invisible god-friend in their pocket. It's there, but they just can't show it.

ROFL
 
Heiwa said:
LOL!
Click to expand...

KreeL said:
ROFL
Click to expand...

Funny, huh?

But looks ain't everything

On a slightly more serious note...

How about - instead of snickering like a couple of nine year-olds* - you explain (in simple, yet grown-up terms) how you know that the one floor immediately below impact was able to resist the free-falling force of the floors above impact
TYIA :)



_______________________
* If you are actually nine, please tell a fart joke instead
 
KreeL said:
It's remarkable how their faithbased paradigm is so ingrained. Pretty much like having an invisible god-friend in their pocket. It's there, but they just can't show it.

ROFL
Click to expand...
Are you an engineer? If so why are you failing to make a post on topic and clear this up for us? Got any evidence or is your entire bag of trick failed talk about the faith-based group you are in and try, yet fail, to project onto others?

Is the gravity collapse of the WTC possible? And what is the energy release in each tower due to gravity alone? Show us that super engineering skills you have to educate all over us and save this thread.
 
KreeL said:
Is Bazant an engineer?

Where's his model?
Click to expand...
Is he?

* C.E., Czech Technical University, Prague, Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering) 1960
* Ph.D. (in mechanics)., Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague 1963
* Postgraduate diploma in Physics, Charles University, Prague 1966
* Docent habil., Czech Technical University, Prague 1967
* S.E. 1970, Illinois Registered Structural Engineer
Research

Professor Bazant's interest spans mechanics of materials and structures, structural safety and engineering applications. The current investigations include some fundamental problems in the field of quasibrittle fracture and damage mechanics, fracture scaling and its asymptotics, size effects, probabilistic mechanics and extreme
Click to expand...
Can you say probabilistic?

I forgot 911Truth just talks and spews delusions.
So I looked it up for you since you are spewing lies and delusions all over the forum; you are great spammer, but I guess engineering is not your bag.

Well is Bazant an engineer?
 
Last edited:
KreeL said:
So where's his model?:confused:

Surely you have faith enough to believe he has one, right?
Click to expand...
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf

Go ahead do some of your delusion conclusion work on this. Please explain what he got wrong and why his model is wrong.

You never knew he was an engineer? How can you be so bad at this 911 stuff? Do you need help; I am an engineer? So what do you have? Some physics? What is the primary energy source for CD?
 
Last edited:
Without even looking, is that his little pencil drawings?

edited to add: Indeed it IS his pencil drawings. ROFL

I guess that's where you got the "Foot of God" theory.
 
Last edited:
I've read all of his theories. They change every other year.

Come to think of it, so do yours.
 
KreeL said:
I've read all of his theories. They change every other year.

Come to think of it, so do yours.
Click to expand...
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf

No you can't refute any thing they have because you have not even told me what is wrong.

Pick an equations and show me what is wrong.

BTW, this is another paper in a real Journal no your 911Truth claptrap journals you have to pay.

you can't understand this paper either

You failed to find the model in the first paper and you will not understand the second paper. You have no clue what forms a model can take.

Now KreeL will talk and say it is all wrong, but he can't get specific due to zero understanding of both papers. No engineering skills just repeating the same old talk from 911Truth delusion producers.
 
Last edited:
KreeL said:
Without even looking, is that his little pencil drawings?

edited to add: Indeed it IS his pencil drawings. ROFL

I guess that's where you got the "Foot of God" theory.
Click to expand...

It's easy to poke holes in a theory if you don't understand it. It's more difficult to propose an alternate theory that makes more sense.

Do you have one? Probably. Will we ever hear what it is? No. Because as soon as you say what YOU think happened, you and everyone else will instantly realize how insane and ridiculous-sounding it is.

In the meantime, we'll go with the little pencil drawings.
 
First it was "THE PANCAKE" -- Then it was "FLOOR TRUSS FAILURE" -- Now it's "FOOT OF GOD".

Oh brother - in his first paper he claimed the jet fuel melted the steel. LOL
 
KreeL said:
First it was "THE PANCAKE" -- Then it was "FLOOR TRUSS FAILURE" -- Now it's "FOOT OF GOD".

Oh brother - in his first paper he claimed the jet fuel melted the steel. LOL
Click to expand...
Source.
Prove it.
How long will you take to provide the page number in the paper?


You proved in one failed post you never read either paper.
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf

Which paper have you read?

Oh brother - in his first paper he claimed the jet fuel melted the steel. LOL
Click to expand...
Show me! Good luck.

You repeat failed dirt dumb ideas from 911Truth. Good job exposing your lack of evidence.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom