New CIT video with Lloyde England

Alzke

Scholar
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
59
Caught this one posted by Craig on the Above Top Secret Forums

Now I know the mere mention of CIT is sure to bring out some strong emotions on this board but I found this video very interesting. PLEASE disregard the accusing nature and tone of Craig and the video and listen to Lloyde.

He is quite adament that he and his cab were *NOT* on the bridge where the widely circulated photos show him. He even points out specifically where the pictures were actually taken. Lloyde does not seem senile or "tricked" by Craig as many on this board have claimed. In fact he comes across as street wise with a sharp memory, as I would expect a cab driver to be.

Go to 6:52 in the video and listen to his comments regarding the thing "so big" that he can't do anything about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho
 
Last edited:
I usually don't follow the CIT North of Citgo stuff, but I thought this clip was interesting.

It's easy to see where the debunkers will seize upon this. First, they'll say that it was unscrupulous for this guy to record Lloyd without telling him. Then they'll say that Lloyd appears too out of it to be reliable.

Which may be true, but there is a discernible difference in the way he describes the situation on camera and off.
 
"Admitting it was planned"

:dl:

9/11 was planned? Who would've thought?
 
I don't believe there is anyone here who gives a hoot about CIT (except a few twoofers) and their delusion, which have been destroyed from every direction to Kalamazoo and back.

They are a fringe of the fringe of the tm. Nothing but an ignorant, deluded cult. Move along, there is nothing to see here....
 
I usually don't follow the CIT North of Citgo stuff, but I thought this clip was interesting.

It's easy to see where the debunkers will seize upon this. First, they'll say that it was unscrupulous for this guy to record Lloyd without telling him. Then they'll say that Lloyd appears too out of it to be reliable.

Which may be true, but there is a discernible difference in the way he describes the situation on camera and off.

Actually no. I would view this as a red herring.

Lloyd English could say "It was a missile, no planes exist!" and I would still not buy into his story. Why? Physical evidence shows otherwise.
 
PLEASE disregard the accusing nature and tone of Craig

No. No, I will not disregard Craig's accusing nature and tone, because not only does it make his intentions, motives, and preconceived notions visible to all, but it also shows him to be a psychotic and borderline dangerous nut case. Playing make-believe is all well and good, but when your game of make-believe starts accusing ordinary innocent people of mass-murder, then it is time to call it quits. Folks like Craig thrive on attention. He doesn't care about 9/11, he doesn't give a rat's behind about the Truth. All he's interested in is the thrill of his little game, and the praise and applause of his fellow nuts. You want proof of this? Craig and Aldo started an "Enemies List" which included, not the people they thought were responsible for 3000 deaths, but rather, people who made fun of them on the Internet. Ask yourself: Is that normal behavior for an activist group?
 
Last edited:
The CIT mutts entire Lloyde bashing exercise is based on the silly notion that Lloyde is the propaganda face of the Pentagon attacks.

Other than CIT's silly hit pieces, who here has ever heard of Lloyde.

Now, who thinks that one out of 100,000 Americans know who he is?

Lloyde trusted these frauds, hell I think he gave them the Capital Taxi sign off of his roof. No wonder the rest of the Truthers think these guys are morons.
 
When will the trials start?
Great question.

A couple more, hey Craig when you gonna come up with the calculations for the NOC witnesses flight paths.... make sure you include the the descent and the pull up over the impact site!

Second, when you gonna rely on a witness that said the plane did not hit the Pentagon.

Third, when are you going to release the unedited versions of your fraudulently recorded tapes?

I mean the hip hop is great, the clever editing is fancy, but when are you going to release the raw tapes?

Raw tapes, flight path calculations, witnesses that support the fly over... then maybe we'll stop pointing out that you are frauds.
 
Actually no. I would view this as a red herring.

Lloyd English could say "It was a missile, no planes exist!" and I would still not buy into his story. Why? Physical evidence shows otherwise.
Alzke,
Are you saying we should take the word of the CIT witnesses over the physical evidence?
Lets also drop this charade.
You are using words that Craig loves to use so lets not pretend that you are a fan of the CIT's and it wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that Craig asked you to post this.
I need to put my boots on if you know what I mean.
 
BTW I don't know if anyone has noticed but Craigs latest game is that if you say anything negative about Craig's belief in Lloyd then you are a racist.
He is using this game with both Lloyd and his other African American witness.
Also the CIT has yet another release coming and they are saying that truthers can use this release to bring it to law enforcement and the media.
So let me get this straight.....
The CIT has wanted people to buy their videos only to then have to do the work of the CIT!
 
BTW I don't know if anyone has noticed but Craigs latest game is that if you say anything negative about Craig's belief in Lloyd then you are a racist.
He is using this game with both Lloyd and his other African American witness.
Also the CIT has yet another release coming and they are saying that truthers can use this release to bring it to law enforcement and the media.
So let me get this straight.....
The CIT has wanted people to buy their videos only to then have to do the work of the CIT!

:eye-poppi:D Where is this and when do I get to play????
 
:eye-poppi:D Where is this and when do I get to play????
Check out the loose change forum in the Pentagon section. In one of the top 2 threads he as usual begins to argue with someone. He calls the poster a racist and a sexist for posting negative comments about Lloyd and his wife.
 
Check out the loose change forum in the Pentagon section. In one of the top 2 threads he as usual begins to argue with someone. He calls the poster a racist and a sexist for posting negative comments about Lloyd and his wife.


As a female and a member of an ethnic minority, this is almost incentive enough to register.

Almost, but not quite.
 

Back
Top Bottom