Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
... building ... explode. ... popping sound,
... low-level flashes.
... blow up a building,
... flashes? ... ,
... explosion on the upper floors. ...
... snapping sounds, pops, little explosions,
... boom boom boom, ... three explosions. … bombs, ... boom boom boom
... ten explosions.
... bombs going off, ... boom, boom, boom, ... a huge explosion...
... three explosions,
... bombs going off. ... explosions happened.…
massive explosion...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg Firemen's Testimony- Study
OMG, you better go get your Pulitzer Prize for exposing 911 as an inside job. Wow, you are the first one!

LOL, you are not very good at simile. Maybe you should try exposing something that is a conspiracy instead of exposing your ignorance. I think you only see the "boom boom boom".

You could win the cherry-picking contest for 911Truth delusion makers.
 
Last edited:
So now they have "ties"? Weren't you saying they had nothing to do with, and had no knowledge of controlled demolition? You've obviously realized how wrong you were.

I see, so merely being subcontracted to demolition projects somehow equates to their full involvement in performing demolition work to take down buildings. You're dishonesty is precarious it is...

OMG, you better go get your Pulitzer Prize for exposing 911 as an inside job. Wow, you are the first one!

LOL, you are not very good at simile. Maybe you should try exposing something that is a conspiracy instead of exposing your ignorance. I think you only see the "boom boom boom".

You could win the cherry-picking contest for 911Truth delusion makers.

If ever there were a time when they could tell the difference between literal and metaphor... you'll see me hang gliding with flying pigs having a jolly conversation about today's cup of tea.... alas it seems I'll have to wait a bit longer for that to happen...
 
Last edited:
So now they have "ties"? Weren't you saying they had nothing to do with, and had no knowledge of controlled demolition?

That's right.

What they have ties to is the controlled demolition industry, as any major construction company would. A business can have ties to another industry without actually being in that industry.

Please try and pay closer attention to what is being said.

And back to the point, since you've yet to say what exactly is suspicious about a company that doesn't perform controlled demolitions renovating the WTC prior to 9/11, one can only assume you presume guilt because they have associations with companies that actually do perform controlled demolitions. This is called "guilt by association", something for which you'd just chastised tfk. The word for that kind of behaviour is "hypocrisy".

You've obviously realized how wrong you were.

Feel free to present your evidence at any time.
 
I see, so merely being subcontracted to demolition projects somehow equates to their full involvement in performing demolition work to take down buildings. You're dishonesty is precarious it is...

I hire a lawn-care company to mow my lawn. So according to the logic RedIbis is employing, I am in the lawn-care industry. And if I come to your house, and your lawn gets mysteriously mowed, I must be the culprit.
 
Yes well there are IDIOTS everywhere...Nationality does not inoculate them from the stupid virus.

TAM;)
 
OMG, you better go get your Pulitzer Prize for exposing 911 as an inside job. Wow, you are the first one!

Originally Posted by bill smith View Post
... building ... explode. ... popping sound,
... low-level flashes.
... blow up a building,
... flashes? ... ,
... explosion on the upper floors. ...
... snapping sounds, pops, little explosions,
... boom boom boom, ... three explosions. … bombs, ... boom boom boom
... ten explosions.
... bombs going off, ... boom, boom, boom, ... a huge explosion...
... three explosions,
... bombs going off. ... explosions happened.…
massive explosion...

LOL, you are not very good at simile. Maybe you should try exposing something that is a conspiracy instead of exposing your ignorance. I think you only see the "boom boom boom".

You could win the cherry-picking contest for 911Truth delusion makers.

An English Professor that knew 9/11 from the Truth Movement quotes would conclude that hyperbole, simile, and metaphor caused the towers to collapse.
 
I wouldn't characterize them that way. I view CTism and antisemitism more like cancer and heart disease. One could be afflicted with one, the other, both or neither.

Yes, I choose my examples on purpose, I feel both are indicative of someone who is ill.
Hey Dave,

But that is precisely the question.

Are they two completely separate maladies? Or are they two manifestations of the same one? Or somewhere in between?

And, just like in epidemiology, correlation coefficients are suggestive, but not definitive.

Certainly one can talk about them as tho they are completely independent. But my suggestion is that the correlation coefficient is sufficiently high to warrant closer investigation.

Recognizing the given "correlation is not causation", I'm nonetheless inclined to conclude that, for a high percentage of cases, they originate from the same source.

Reasoned opinions may differ on this one.

tom
 
Yes well there are IDIOTS everywhere...Nationality does not inoculate them from the stupid virus.

TAM;)
Hey TAM,

What makes me think that getting on the jury for this program is comparable to getting on the Maury Povitch show?

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/153246



tom
 
An English Professor that knew 9/11 from the Truth Movement quotes would conclude that hyperbole, simile, and metaphor caused the towers to collapse.

This is excellent. Might I use it in my signature???

TAM:)
 
I'm trying to figure out how "10ing" is the new "f**king".

Are the kids going back to binary??

Can someone explain the etimology of this?

And for that matter, where the heck did "pwning" come from? And how does one pronounce it? :rolleyes:

tom


"Rule 10" is JREF's "no profanity" rule. Around here, the phrase "rule 10" is used to censor oneself, kind of like bleeping out swear words on television.

I assume orphia nay purposefully replaced the first four letters of the word with "rule 10" in order to represent the vulgarity of the truther's threat as accurately as possible without breaking the rules over here.
 
All I can say is that here whenever I've seen the terms, "joos" or "the jews did it" etc etc, it's by a debunker.

The planes brought the towers down into their own footprints and the Jews could not tell the difference between Nazis and Zionists because they are the same and always will be. There was paint in the offices of building #7 so it was the paint that brought it down. The Pied Piper loves debunkers of the truth that 9-11 was a PNAC, Skull and Bones Job. A trillion dollars spent on IRAQ and Afghanistan war almost 5000 US soldiers dead every body but the Bushwhackers say over a million Iraqis have been killed. Bow to the Bush Billionaire war Profiteers bow yee debunker bow...Left is Right and Right is fascist and Galileo is left go figure. Debunkers, the human subspecies, are not worth spell checking for. Wallow in your war until it comes to the truth debunkers door...

But he doesn't have a clue about 9/11 and if he had (big Israel friend that he is) he wouldn't say. But that's ok. I thought it was muslims too who did 9/11 until 2005 or so and that suited me fine because it proved that Muslims are hostile against the West, giving people like me ammo against diversity mongers like Beachnut in order to prevent that my country becomes a third world cesspool.

But now that I know that Israel did it, that's fine as well because now we can go after those that inflicted diversity upon us in the first place.

It's amazing what you can miss if you're trying not to see it.

Dave
 
Yes, I saw that. It didn't contradict the sentence I quoted, however carefully it was written to look like it did.

Dave

I said that there are bigots who post on this forum. The larger point is that most of the "joos did it" type references come from debunkers.

Do you disagree with that?
Do you think it's fair to lump in all those who question 9/11 with a few bigots?
 
I said that there are bigots who post on this forum. The larger point is that most of the "joos did it" type references come from debunkers.

Do you disagree with that?
Do you think it's fair to lump in all those who question 9/11 with a few bigots?

I can tell you that the USENET groups are awash with anti-Semitic crap, free-standing and glued onto every other k00k and conspiracy theory, especially 9/11 and possibly with the exception UFOs and BigFoot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom