• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

Post #92.
Known as Altgens5.
Taken after the 2nd shot.
There was still some "cognitive dissonance".. No one shoots at the President.
 
So, it is of your opinion that:

1. A mystery gunman shot from somewhere in front of the limo, through the windshield, and into Kennedy's adam's apple, deftly avoiding the rearview mirror, the driver, the other secret service agent, the governor, and the governor's seat, in broad daylight, while somehow avoiding detection from anyone on the scene.

2. Oswald shot from the 6th floor of the TSBD. Since the governor and Kennedy both reacted at the same time to their respective wounds, Oswald and the front shooter somehow timed their shots with absolute perfect precision.

3. A few seconds later, the driver deliberately stopped the limo, turned around, and fired the shot which exploded the front of Kennedy's head, also miraculously escaping detection.

Does this pretty well sum up your theory of what happened in Dealy Plaza that day? Any other shooters we need to examine? The grassy knoll shooter, perhaps? Maybe the umbrella man?

Bump. Roundhead, please confirm, deny, or offer a different version of events.

Thanks in advance.
 
Of all the JFK conspiracy theories, the one where the driver shoots him is the most loony to date.
 
Of all the JFK conspiracy theories, the one where the driver shoots him is the most loony to date.

It's a good one. But I think I have another two that surpasse it. Off the top of my head:

1.) Bonar Menninger's book, Mortal Error,theorizes that a secret service agent, George Hickey, accidentally shot Kennedy with his AR-15.

2.) This is the best one. Per "Newsweek," one guy at an assassination symposium in Dallas argued that LBJ shot Kennedy (yes, actually shot him) with one of his six-guns concealed by a cape (Reclaiming History, Bugliosi 1497).

But, yeah, you're right. Of all the one "mainstream" theories picking up steam, the driver one is pretty tough to beat.
 
Last edited:
Fetzer's idea that the Zapruder film was doctored to show something completely different from what happened is pretty out-there too, if you consider how 1960s tampering technology could be used to fool 1970s and later experts in photographic film.
 
Maybe he realized he's on the wrong side of this particular argument and simply has nothing to say? I'd like to think so.
 
Bump. Roundhead, please confirm, deny, or offer a different version of events.

Thanks in advance.

Whoops, just about slipped off the first page. Roundhead, if you could please rejoin the thread you started, in which questions were directed toward you, that would be great.
 
Roundhead, if you could please rejoin the thread you started, in which questions were directed toward you, that would be great.

Roundhead, I've been waiting for quite a while for you to answer these questions. I'm gonna need you to go ahead and come back in here to answer them. Yeah. That would be great.

officespace_lumbergh.jpg
 
Roundhead, I've been waiting for quite a while for you to answer these questions. I'm gonna need you to go ahead and come back in here to answer them. Yeah. That would be great.

[qimg]http://www.the-reel-mccoy.com/movies/1999/images/officespace_lumbergh.jpg[/qimg]

Roundhead is on hiatus. On his return, I'd like to see him open a thread about the Warren Commission report and it's credibility, in addition to answering any outstanding questions from this thread.
 
Last edited:
So, the others wouldn't know the sound of a .45 caliber pistol firing 10 feet away from them (a .45 does NOT sound like a fire cracker)? They wouldn't notice Kennedy's face not being there (which would have been the result if your theory were true)? They wouldn't see the smoke?

You obviously have no idea how a gun works.

On roundhead's return, maybe we could have a thread discussing the particular gun used by the driver to shoot Kennedy?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom