You mean the greatest event in the history of the world has no historical evidence for it's existence?
That's some great event.
Then why are we spending so much time talking about this event 2000 years later.
Then why are we spending so much time talking about this event 2000 years later. You need to really spend some time thinking about that.
Well, gosh-lee, then wouldn't you think the {Resurrection} accounts would be clear, detailed and accurate?
How many posts have you made on JREF regarding the Odyssey.I still talk about the oddessy with people, but that doesn't mean I'm going to worry about Scylla and Charybdis when sailing around Greece.
If the Resurrection story was made up, it probably would be clear and detailed.
If the Resurrection story was made up, it probably would be clear and detailed.
As many as necessary to consider the claims suggesting there is evidence that Homer was telling the truthHow many posts have you made on JREF regarding the Odyssey.
Other than this thread I honestly can not remember the last time I discussed the resurrection. I guess it is over 10 years ago.Then why are we spending so much time talking about this event 2000 years later. You need to really spend some time thinking about that.
Nope.If the Resurrection story was made up, it probably would be clear and detailed.
none that I can remember. But then again, I can't remember debating anyone who was foolish enough to believe that simply because the story is old and still talked about, that it must be true.How many posts have you made on JREF regarding the Odyssey.
DOC, as far as we know the stories (plural) of your messiah's birth, life, death and resurrection are ALL made up
You promised us some evidence, remember?
You haven't got any
Same old lie. Yes lie. You've been told that these are not "sources" of anything relevant to your claim and some are not even reliable. Your repeated use despite knowing that these are false statements is an obvious lie.Yes, and from Non-Christian sources:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4633677#post4633677
Same old discredited garbage.And regarding the thread's topic there is this:
http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
Yes, and from Non-Christian sources:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4633677#post4633677
Which was already shown to be not-evidence.And regarding the thread's topic there is this:
http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
Yes, and from Non-Christian sources:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4633677#post4633677
And regarding the thread's topic there is this:
http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1
and if you live outside the US and can't get the previous URL you can view this one:
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=51643
Which primary source you admitted was a forgery.
You and other skeptics have the right to your opinion. If people read my 725 posts they will know mine.Which was already shown to be not-evidence.
Spam, spam, spam, spam, spammity-spaaaaaaam.
Not according to you:Of course this is false.
Non Sequitur -- copyists of a Josephus' work are not bible writers.
And if something is added to a quote, what is added can certainly be true. And if the copyists did not believe what they were doing was wrong, but an accepted activity (assuming there was an insertion), and they were not trying to deceive but inform people where information was very scarce, then there was no lying.
No. Everyone's rejection of your nonsense if a valid conclusion based on your inability to furnish evidence.You and other skeptics have the right to your opinion. If people read my 725 posts they will know mine.
That's right. You only admitted that it was an interpolation and that's COMPLETELY different.Of course this is false.
Same old lie. Yes lie. You've been told that these are not "sources" of anything relevant to your claim and some are not even reliable. Your repeated use despite knowing that these are false statements is an obvious lie.