Oy! No dockies, no facts, no matter how many times and in however many ways you want to claim your beady eyes spied them.
Now can you possibly restrain you need to post about nothing until you and or 16.5 actually have something in-hand? Is it really that much to ask? FMG!
Why are you afraid to answer my question, Roger?
If you have access to the one report, why dont you have access to the followup reports as well? Why not go over there right now, and check those reports?
My superiors feel the same way i do about 9/11.
Only if the believers can restrain from spreading the lies that they know what happened that day without any fact, evidence, or official reports.
Oh? Then your superiors should be able to expedite the release of the documents you claim exist.
What's stopping them?
Roger? What's it going to be huh?
Whaddayasay? You up for it? Are you man enough?
i stand by the fact that the document states a plane was intercepted, either flight 93 or flight 1989 confuesed for flight 93.
Sorry but i can see you know nothing of the declassifcation process.
Please learn more before posting about something you know nothing about.
Why did you lie? You said the critic from the NSA stated that 93 was shot down. Why are not not answering me liar?
So it's yet another question you are unable to provide an answer to.
You're not very good at this.
Gee, someones really scared of a document.
gee, someones really scared of a document.
So I called NSA. The "parent" FOIA request (i.e. U1's request) to my request has been referred to THREE other agencies, where it is no doubt sitting on the bottom of their intake queues..