NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did anyone else notice that U1 conveniently left the forum (again) the moment parky took him up on his offer?

Or was it just me?
 
Well if you had read more of my post you would have seen that i have also confirmed the existance of the document through a phone call to the FOIA office.

For which we have only your word. That's convenient for you. And, based on your linguistic interpretation skills as displayed in the letter, what you interpreted as confirmation of the document's existence may have been intended by the speaker as "Good morning".

Dave
 
Last edited:
Ultima1: Yes hello.

NSA FOIA Personnel: How may I help you.

Ultima1: Yes I recently sent in an FOIA, the request ref # = XXXXX. I was wondering if you have my documents?

NSA FOIA Personnel: One moment...elevator music...SIr, your request has been received, and documents responsive to your request have been gathered.

Ultima1: Thank you.

Click


TAM:)
 
Ultima1: Yes hello.

NSA FOIA Personnel: How may I help you.

Ultima1: Yes I recently sent in an FOIA, the request ref # = XXXXX. I was wondering if you have my documents?

NSA FOIA Personnel: One moment...elevator music...SIr, your request has been received, and documents responsive to your request have been gathered.

Ultima1: Can you please confirm that the documents you're sending me actually exist?

NSA FOIA Personnel: :confused: I'm sorry, sir, can you please explain what you mean?

Ultima1: I want confirmation that the documents exist.

NSA FOIA Personnel: :boggled: Yes sir, I can confirm that the documents we are sending you do indeed exist. NSA policy forbids the forwarding of non-existent documents.

Ultima1: Ha! So you admit there's a document proving that Flight 93 was shot down! Let's see what the shills at JREF make of that!

NSA FOIA Personnel: [deciding discretion is the better part of valour] Thank you for your enquiry, sir. Have a nice day. [click! brrrrrr.....]

Dave
 
No it will not.


It will show that a plane was intercepted.


You see the RADAR data is there, it shows no fighter intercepted 93.

It will show that a plane was intercepted.

as does the impact crater and parts on the ground.

Funny how Payne Stwearts small learjet made almosts as big as crater as a 757. Also funny is that it left big parts that could be recognized.

There are no NTSB reports matching parts found to Flight 93.
 
Last edited:
Funny that a submariner should be on KC. The Missouri River was a little shallow for subs last time I canoed it. I bet a woman is involved.


When did anyone say that subs were on river?

You do know it is a test site for testing weapons?
 
One piece of paper can not overturn all the physics and facts.

What facts? I am still waiting for a bleiver to post the FBI and NTSB crime scene reports.

The document does contridict the official story, once 1 part of a report has been proven wrong the whole report is suspect.
 
Alas, I'm only a contractor


Even a contractor should have been able to figure out by now that i am who i say i am. Tells me a lot about you.


The fact that he's still posting on here confirms my theory that he's not with NSA at all

The fact that i am still on here proves my point that immature people like you do not know what you are talking about or doing.

Honestly, I feel sorry for the poor guy; I would imagine his superiors have to be riding him hard for not safeguarding his own information better.

My superiors feel the same way i do about 9/11.
 
Last edited:
This is from your first post after your recent hiatus from this forum. Was the research you were working on related to the topic of this thread? .

Yes it was related to this thread but also to others.

I am trying to find the truth about what really happened on 9/11.
 
Uhm.. why do we need crime scene reports when we have .. final reports?

The ony official reports for 9/11 are the FBI and NTSB reports since the FBI and NTSB are the only official investigating agencies for 9/11.

What final reports do you have ?
 
Last edited:
Honestly, can we put this wankfest to bed until and/or unless there's some actual documentation to talk about? This is getting so far OT, it's ridiculous

Well its just the believers trying to come up with anything they can to keep from accepting that fact that the official story that they have been believing in so much for so long might not be true.
 
Oy! No dockies, no facts, no matter how many times and in however many ways you want to claim your beady eyes spied them.

You're hardly one to be casting aspersions about others when you've done a dandy job of goalpost moving yourself.

Now can you possibly restrain you need to post about nothing until you and or 16.5 actually have something in-hand? Is it really that much to ask? FMG!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom