• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Simple question for Bigfoot enthusiasts: Why no unambiguous photos/videos?

Perhaps after they have finished stealing salmon, instead of choosing to dine at the nearest bear den, they would choose to consume it in a safer environment. Like in a bigfoot abode.
Click to expand...

On Mars perhaps. There are no bear on Mars. Or maybe there are. They might even have pursed lips and steal children.

bigfoot-mars.jpg

http://goingbald.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/bigfoot-mars.jpg
 
kitakaze said:
I absolutely love the B&W image of the Bigfoot strung up dead in the bottom right of the collage, Correa. That is exactly the type of image that we should have seen many times if Bigfoot is/was real. We should see images like that along with ceremonial Bigfoot skull helmuts and Bigfoot skin rugs by the fire.

Where did you get it, BTW?
Click to expand...
Cryptomundo. I think whoever made it followed the "Civil War pterodactyl" tradition. It provides ab easy way to evade the question "OK, where's the body"?

Look, reliable evidence pieces on bigfoot actually are not openly shown to avoid images of strung dead gentle forest apemen becoming a common sight. Big white hunters would flock to kill our garlic-loving cousins.

And here is the new, improved Patty faces pareidolia festival collage, with Drew's interpretation added.
pattyfacev4.jpg

You know what? Given PGF's poor resolution, mask not completely unlike Drew's ninja bigfoot interpretation pehaps could do the trick...
 
LONGTABBER PE said:
>>>I'm not thinking much of yours right now either. Was my name added to the topic header when I wasn't looking?

No, not you specifically but I have read yours over the years. What you "think" of mine really isnt an issue with me because I'm really not in the business of dealing of those who cannot present a solvent case in the first place and base their statements on anecdotal evidence and when challenged cannot stand on their own.
Click to expand...

Yes, I mislaid my bigfoot body (and the freezer it came in), so I've had to wing it. Sorry about that.

Why subject yourself to such torture? You could have just filtered me. It's not too late you know; you can do that now.
>>>Weak or worn out? Lackadaisical? Insufficiently illustrated? Not enough links? I haven't even worked up enough enthusiasm this time around to hit Print Screen.

Would not matter either way

>>>I've seen all this many times before - there should be photos, there should be fossils, there should be roadkill, there should be one stuffed in the Smithsonian by now...........I used to size images and suggest people read the references so I wouldn't have to type out whole books. I'm tired of it. My interest peaked in 1969 and I doubt I'll be able to get back to that level of excitement again even if someone brings one in on a slab.

Always a bridesmaid............You came back
Click to expand...

Temporarily. It's like rubbernecking at an accident or noting Ground Zero on a trip to New York.

I suppose I should consider inpatient treatment for message board addiction.
 
Yeah_Right said:
And Lal will always return with,ummm, interesting arguments for the pro side of Bigfoot. I am beginning to worry about her though, thinking that an obvious video of a man relieving himself in the woods might be a Bigfoot foraging. Really Lal, you need to raise your standards when it comes to evidence. I especially cringed when you said it was a ringer for Patty. Now I am no expert on Bigfoot, I haven't read Krantz and all those chaps, but even I can see that it in no way resembles the PGF subject.
Click to expand...

Someone who thinks Patty is a man in a suit doesn't see a resemblance to a man in a jacket? That's remarkable.

Do you have a capture showing the urine stream? I didn't notice that on my step-throughs.

The idea of "jeans" was based on an artifact, the fake fur on a misconception by Davis refuted by Williams with her blue gorilla photos and the idea of it being an automatic fake was based on the idea that anything posted on YouTube must be a fake. I wanted to counter all that and got my chance on the MABRC thread.

I did not say "ringer" and the observation wasn't mine originally. I was surprised that the person even made it. My comment on YouTube may have been a little excessive, but I wanted to set a good tone so the people I was contacting would know they'd be welcome to discuss this in a civil way. Maybe we could have found out if there was an effort to determine height and that sort of thing.

One of the mods' jobs on MABRC was to stimulate discussion and we had a hard time keeping them going back then. There was too much agreement.
 
makaya325 said:
Nice drew. Again, humans have recognized the gorilla for over 1000 years. The Mountain Gorilla was simply a subspecies discovered in a remote area of Africa, nothing amazing.
Click to expand...

I think all that discovery-in-Africa stuff is amazing. And I think the link is totally sweet. Why are you downplaying the awesomeness of my link? Regardless of whether you believe a giant hairy unclassified ape is running around the PNW, that link I provided has some totally sweet photos.

CN- My fave is the far right, middle guy, it totally looks like a Well-Groomed-Kenny-Rogers-Live-on-Christmas-Special Patty.
 
Last edited:
makaya325 said:
Nice drew. Again, humans have recognized the gorilla for over 1000 years. The Mountain Gorilla was simply a subspecies discovered in a remote area of Africa, nothing amazing.
Click to expand...

Hey! Little mak is back! You must have missed us after being booted out of the BFF as both "blue bear" and "duke of earl".

What is the 1000 years about? Humans have certainly recognized the gorilla longer than 1000 years. It's not like gorillas just appeared out of nowhere a thousand years ago. You might want to rethink your statement.
 
Drewbot said:
I think all that discovery-in-Africa stuff is amazing. And I think the link is totally sweet. Why are you downplaying the awesomeness of my link? Regardless of whether you believe a giant hairy unclassified ape is running around the PNW, that link I provided has some totally sweet photos.
Click to expand...

I found the "death masks of 5 gorillas" to be the most striking and macabre.

CN- My fave is the far right, middle guy, it totally looks like a Well-Groomed-Kenny-Rogers-Live-on-Christmas-Special Patty.
Click to expand...

That was my favourite as well. Who couldn't love that face? Such a serene looking dude.
 
Which, BTW, shows that one would not need a mask completely hiding the guy-in-the-costume's face. Just a "beard" and cap, maybe made of leather, perhaps like an old American footbal player helmet...

Wait! Where have I read something like that?
 
kitakaze said:
Hey! Little mak is back! You must have missed us after being booted out of the BFF as both "blue bear" and "duke of earl".

What is the 1000 years about? Humans have certainly recognized the gorilla longer than 1000 years. It's not like gorillas just appeared out of nowhere a thousand years ago. You might want to rethink your statement.
Click to expand...


I said humans recognized gorillas for thousands of years. The discovery of the Mountain Gorilla in 1902 is cited as the discovery of the first gorilla species according to some Cryptozoologists, which is completely false, since Man has known about the Lowland Gorilla since 1847.
 
makaya325 said:
I said humans recognized gorillas for thousands of years. The discovery of the Mountain Gorilla in 1902 is cited as the discovery of the first gorilla species according to some Cryptozoologists, which is completely false, since Man has known about the Lowland Gorilla since 1847.
Click to expand...

Were the people who lived near the gorillas, and knew about them, for hundreds of years not considered "Man"?
 
LAL said:
Yes, I mislaid my bigfoot body (and the freezer it came in), so I've had to wing it. Sorry about that.

Why subject yourself to such torture? You could have just filtered me. It's not too late you know; you can do that now.


Temporarily. It's like rubbernecking at an accident or noting Ground Zero on a trip to New York.

I suppose I should consider inpatient treatment for message board addiction.
Click to expand...

Nope it's got to be removed surgically.
 
GT/CS said:
Mak, are you going to answser this question?
Click to expand...

I have no evidence that natives didnt know about gorillas before 1847. That i didnt claim. I claimed that Homo Sapiens recognized the gorillas existence for 1000's of years, and catalogued the First known species of gorilla in 1847.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom