Hardfire: Physics of 9/11

I cannot hold a discussion here without ... Heiwa claiming that structures are scale-invariant.

I notice you do not reply to my posts. So it is due to me claiming that structures are scale-invariant? Where? When? Why?

What I claim is that a phenomenon like a structural one-way crush down, that a part C of a structure A (C<1/10A) can crush A, has nothing to do with scale, size or material or structure for that matter.

What I claim is that the phenomenon is physically impossible according to my Axiom:

You cannot one-way crush an isotropic or composite 3-D structure part A by a part C of itself (C = 1/10 A) by dropping part C on part A using gravity. Part C either bounces on part A or gets damaged in contact with part A and is stopped by part A that is also damaged a little. It is quite basic and all due to gravity. Materials, size and particulars of the elements of the structure part A doesn't matter the least. Part C of part A cannot destroy part A.

And you Mackey, NASA engineer, seem incapable of demonstrating the opposite. But you are not alone. Not one JREF poster has managed it.
 
Given that he is good at explaining and reasonably accurate on the technicals "they" have no option than try the character assassination.

Standard legal process - If you have no case attack the witness.

And the first corollary "If they attack the witness they have no case"

The only real question is how long does the bubble of this conspiracy last before either bursting or simply deflating.
 
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

A top down progressive global collapse in a closed model is impossible on planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. The NIST scientists KNOW this, Mackey KNOWS this, Haewa KNOWS this, and I KNOW this. Giving 15% of ANYTHING a walking headstart it CANNOT EVER obliterate the bottom 85% of its structural self. Haewa asked for a model and NIST, or anyone else, cannot produce it. Why? Because it's impossible.
 
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

A top down progressive global collapse in a closed model is impossible on planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. The NIST scientists KNOW this, Mackey KNOWS this, Haewa KNOWS this, and I KNOW this. Giving 15% of ANYTHING a walking headstart it CANNOT EVER obliterate the bottom 85% of its structural self. Haewa asked for a model and NIST, or anyone else, cannot produce it. Why? Because it's impossible.

Repetitive utter nonsense.
 
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

Hushaboom!

A top down progressive global collapse in a closed model is impossible on planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. The NIST scientists KNOW this, Mackey KNOWS this, Haewa KNOWS this, and I KNOW this. Giving 15% of ANYTHING a walking headstart it CANNOT EVER obliterate the bottom 85% of its structural self. Haewa asked for a model and NIST, or anyone else, cannot produce it. Why? Because it's impossible.
If you KNOW this, where is you Nobel prize? Where is "Haewa's" ?? Where? Nowhere, because using this type of truther logic, there is a cat ownstairs that is a vampire.
 
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

No, no, you've got it wrong. He does it because we at the NWO pay him extremely well. Probably a few thousand times the allowance you get from your parents.
 
Last edited:
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

A top down progressive global collapse in a closed model is impossible on planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. The NIST scientists KNOW this, Mackey KNOWS this, Haewa KNOWS this, and I KNOW this. Giving 15% of ANYTHING a walking headstart it CANNOT EVER obliterate the bottom 85% of its structural self. Haewa asked for a model and NIST, or anyone else, cannot produce it. Why? Because it's impossible.

Impotent, arrogant, irrelevant, spittle-spewing gibberish. You are wrong. The world knows you are wrong. You are the internet version of the wild-eyed old man on the street corner telling me the world is going to end. For them, I simply walk around them and get on with life.

With you, well, when I turn off my computer, your "truth" movement vanishes.
 
Impotent, arrogant, irrelevant, spittle-spewing gibberish. You are wrong. The world knows you are wrong. You are the internet version of the wild-eyed old man on the street corner telling me the world is going to end. For them, I simply walk around them and get on with life.

With you, well, when I turn off my computer, your "truth" movement vanishes.

Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for civility
If you disagree with my statement, then simply post your model proving me wrong. Mackey can't do it, because he already knows it's impossible. NIST couldn't do it either. Maybe you can win the prize:confused: -- not a chance.:cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

A top down progressive global collapse in a closed model is impossible on planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. The NIST scientists KNOW this, Mackey KNOWS this, Haewa KNOWS this, and I KNOW this. Giving 15% of ANYTHING a walking headstart it CANNOT EVER obliterate the bottom 85% of its structural self. Haewa asked for a model and NIST, or anyone else, cannot produce it. Why? Because it's impossible.


Please feel free to explain what progressive collapse is and why it is impossible.
 
It appears the brilliance of the great Ryan Mackey is spreading far and wide.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread445736/pg5 :D

psik


I don't see what the big to do is about this. Usually yeild strength of a single member in measured in MPa, that is the amount of pressure required to deform an elelment acting over a unit area. There is a deviation in the member associated with a distance before this occurs. For purposes of simplification why can't we consider the amount of work done on the member (or more importantly structure) before deformation or failure?
 
With you, well, when I turn off my computer, your "truth" movement vanishes.

The corollary to this is when the turth movement turns off their computers their chances of seeing a naked girl vanishes. :D

Yah I said it, but we were all thinking it.
 
I believe that Mackey himself knows the WTC towers were exploded. Why he keeps up his cheap charade is beyond me. Perhaps to impress you guvtardz.

A top down progressive global collapse in a closed model is impossible on planet Earth. Always has been, always will be. The NIST scientists KNOW this, Mackey KNOWS this, Haewa KNOWS this, and I KNOW this. Giving 15% of ANYTHING a walking headstart it CANNOT EVER obliterate the bottom 85% of its structural self. Haewa asked for a model and NIST, or anyone else, cannot produce it. Why? Because it's impossible.
guvtardz; this is the best you can come up with?
If you understood physics you would not fall for the lie of the WTC being exploded. This is the best you can do attack others who understand 911 instead of gaining knowledge. cool, you are the man, or woman

The rest of your post is pure poppycock, Heiwa's models are pure delusions and to follow Heiwa's lead on 911 is priceless. Got physics?
 
Note that on that thread... "RockHound" is a sock for Rob Balsamo. The man is a few fries short of a happy meal.
.
That must be what qualifies him as a commercial airline pilot, right?

http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

It is certainly curious how you JREFers are constantly making personal attacks on people but it doesn't bother you that the NIST doesn't come up with OBJECTIVE DATA like the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE on every level of skyscrapers that supposedly collapsed straight down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXAerZUw4Wc

psik
 
.
That must be what qualifies him as a commercial airline pilot, right?

http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

It is certainly curious how you JREFers are constantly making personal attacks on people but it doesn't bother you that the NIST doesn't come up with OBJECTIVE DATA like the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE on every level of skyscrapers that supposedly collapsed straight down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXAerZUw4Wc

psik


Why do you need that exact number again?
 

Back
Top Bottom