Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
I'm afraid that that is wishful thinking on your part. Truthers do not go back, Once you realise that 9/11 was an inside job there is no going back, there has been one fairly highly-publiciced incident of a Truther reverting which I susect was a set up and that is it as far as I know. It doesn't work the other way though as the ranks of the Truth Movement continue to swell.
Click to expand...

Proof is where? Only in the minds of 911Truth delusion believers?

With 0.001 percent of all engineers your ranks are a few with nut case ideas on 911. A fringe few.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Experiment in Behaviour:
10 monkeys are introduced to a cage. After they are left to settle in for a week or so the experiment begins. The experimenter has hung a rope from the middle of the ceiling with a banana at the very top. A monkey quickly scales the rope and snatches the banana which releases a shower of water that soaks all the other monkeys. No big deal. The next day another banana magically appears and one of the monkeys scales the rope, grabs the banana which again releases a shower of water on the other monkeys.This happens three or four days running and leaves a lot of fuming soaked monkeys. On the fifth day when the magic banana appears, a monkey goes to scale the rope at which the other monkeys attack and stop him. On the next say no monkey tries to climb the rope.

Then a monkey is taken out and is replaced with a new one. Sure enough when the banana appears the next day he is the only one to go for it and gets duly beaten up for his trouble. The same the next day.From then on no monkey tries to climb for the banana.

Thereafter every few days one old monkey after another is extracted and replaced with another until there are 10 new monkeys. Interestingly none of the 10 will climb for the magic banana when it is offered.......and not a single one actually knows why not ..
Click to expand...

So you came back here to say... what exactly? I have to repeat what six7s asked:

Are you well?
 
bill smith said:
I read this before but could not find it again. Thanks.
Click to expand...


Oh, really? So you were aware that what you were about to type was incorrect, but you went ahead and typed it anyway? Exactly why did you consciously choose to spew such misinformation?
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Oh, really? So you were aware that what you were about to type was incorrect, but you went ahead and typed it anyway? Exactly why did you consciously choose to spew such misinformation?
Click to expand...

Didn't you know? It is OK to lie for The TruthTM.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Oh, really? So you were aware that what you were about to type was incorrect, but you went ahead and typed it anyway? Exactly why did you consciously choose to spew such misinformation?
Click to expand...

Actually I had forgotten the details in the article. Of course I don't take what they say as gospel. It will need more research than that.
 
Last edited:
AJM8125 said:
Proves nothing. I can get the opposite result from starting the same poll on this board.

ETA: I just cleared my cookies and was able to vote a second time. Not exactly a scientific poll.

ETA 2: Oops, just voted again from my iPhone.

ETA 3: Wow, switched proxies and was able to vote a fourth and fifth time.
Click to expand...

There are hundreds of proxies and many computers in networks and automated cookies clearing programs = poll fail
 
bill smith said:
Here's an interesting real-time measurement of the progress of the Truth Movement in the wider community. This is a 9/11 forum that has been extremely active for 2.5 years. This is page one which contains a poll. You have to vote to see what the poll progress is up to today.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04T49GGG7HFO
Click to expand...

Of course 9/11 was a conspiracy...............




















































One man can't hijack four airplanes.
 
N e w s f l a s h

This could be interesting.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19761

The paper ends with this sentence:''Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.''
 
bill smith said:
This could be interesting.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19761

The paper ends with this sentence:''Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.''
Click to expand...

You must of missed the the thread here on that BS paper. They have nothing new and are spewing the same old debunked lies that they have since like 2005.
 
bill smith said:
This could be interesting.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19761

The paper ends with this sentence:''Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.''
Click to expand...

Now it's not just thermite- it's also the presence of nano-materials which are highly specialised and have no right to be in the WTC dust.. I'd say the grey material is also a nano compound of some kind.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Now it's not just thermite- it's also the presence of nano-materials which are highly specialised and have no right to be in the WTC dust.. I'd say the grey material is also a nano compound of some kind.
Click to expand...

No. It's just paint.
 
dtugg said:
No. It's just paint.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see a much more detailed report on the properties of the grey material. Obviously there was a reason for it's presence- and those properties might point the way to the light.. One thing I DO remember- Steven Jones in his Boston lecture in december 2007 said that the grey material was very tough.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
PS a little after the 1:20 minute mark in this video they say that the FBI cinfirmed that the Israelis we know as 'the dancing Israelis' were filming the WTC BEFORE the first plane struck.
Click to expand...

If you combine the above information with what the Israeli in the talk show at the end of this clip says what is your conclusion ? Is it an inescapable conclusion ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom