Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Though in 2006 it was hardly mainstream, the TM was at its peak, however small, when the article was written.

What Have You Done For Me Lately?

TAM;)
 
Though in 2006 it was hardly mainstream, the TM was at its peak, however small, when the article was written.

What Have You Done For Me Lately?

TAM;)

Slowlee slowlee catchee monkee TAM. We are in no rush and we are not going to go away.
 
Apart from that even ''Time Magazine' said ages ago that the truth Movement is no longer a fringe phenomenon but are now a political reality.
As you - and any journalist - should know, making appeals to popularity is a logical fallacy

Cold, hard, concrete reality isn't affected by what you or anyone else believes or desires... its what you do that matters

Which reminds me...

Care to describe even ONE effective action that you are participating in?
 
Bill,how did this
I think the video sequence here was reversed .

Suddenly become this ?

Can you comment on why they have reversed the sequence of the video ?

For a news organisation to be offering a forgery as hard news is kind of unusual to say the very least.

I would stake my life that Jamie McInyre meant that from what he saw he had no reason to believe a plane had hit the Pentagon. This is strongly backed up by the fact that 'in his close-up inspection' he never once mentions the powerful reek of jet fuel which should have been choking and blinding him. Don't forget a fully fuelled 757 was supposd to have impacted the stone wall of the Pentagon only a short tme before.

In the face of all these indicators why are you so adamant that McIntyre meant something else altoether ?
I'm surprised that an honest person like yourself is not more curiuos about why the video sequence was reversed.

When does you "thinking" something suddenly become hard fact ?
 
Last edited:
Slowlee slowlee catchee monkee TAM. We are in no rush and we are not going to go away.

At this rate, my great great great grandchildren may "recall" hearing about some sort of small movement of radicals declaring 9/11 was an inside job.

Good luck with that...lol

TAM:)
 
says Korey Rowe, 23, who produced the movie. "That 19 hijackers are going to completely bypass security and crash four commercial airliners in a span of two hours, with no interruption from the military forces, in the most guarded airspace in the United States and the world? That to me is a conspiracy theory."
An article about the fictional LC video that Rowe, a dirt dumb kid who loves to think LC is real.

The complex plot of kill pilots fly plane into buildings was too hard for the mastermind of Rowe to comprehend, so he believes the made up lies, and delusions of LC that you believe. Lack of knowledge is your excuse or what? You will never present facts and evidence to save your failed ideas on 911. You are years late to the 911Truth failed idea movement, wrong for over 7 years.
 
Last edited:
Is this nebulous ? The FBI has over 80 videos of the Pentagon incident.


Incorrect. They have over 80 9/11-related videos that were either confiscated or submitted to them. Very few of them were actually of the Pentagon or its surroundings.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/FBI_hides_84_Pentagon_videos

The FBI are talking about 85 videos, but this is just the result of an initial search that includes (for example) all videos obtained by the Washington Field Office. If we move on from that then the numbers begin to fall dramatically.

56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."

Of the remaining 29 videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."

Of the 13 remaining tapes, 12 "only showed the Pentagon after the impact of Flight 77."

Only one tape showed the Pentagon impact: the Pentagon's own security camera footage, that would later be released.


You're not very well-researched, bill smith.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't this require that you be moving in the general direction of the monkey, though?

Respectfully,
Myriad

yes, but you see they have moved the goal posts on this one so far, that a "truther" for their purposes, is anyone who says,

"well that's odd" when shown a video of Silverstein saying "pull it".

TAM:)
 
Here's an interesting real-time measurement of the progress of the Truth Movement in the wider community. This is a 9/11 forum that has been extremely active for 2.5 years. This is page one which contains a poll. You have to vote to see what the poll progress is up to today.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04T49GGG7HFO

A few fringe nut case idea believers posting stupid at topix for years; are you one of them? You ideas are fiction as you post without proof. A web site with a bunch of people who lack the skill to understand 911 posting lies. Conspiracy theorists without evidence for 7 plus years are posting stupid at topix. What is new? If you could fine one piece of evidence it would be breakthrough.
 
Most people just vote when hey pass by. Apart from that even ''Time Magazine' said ages ago that the truth Movement is no longer a fringe phenomenon but are now a political reality. I take that as mainsteam aceptance tht we had officialy arrived as of that date.


Did you read the entire article? Were they telling the truth about the growth of the truth movement on page one but chickened out and became traitorous, lying shills by page three?
 
At this rate, my great great great grandchildren may "recall" hearing about some sort of small movement of radicals declaring 9/11 was an inside job.

Good luck with that...lol

TAM:)

Experiment in Behaviour:
10 monkeys are introduced to a cage. After they are left to settle in for a week or so the experiment begins. The experimenter has hung a rope from the middle of the ceiling with a banana at the very top. A monkey quickly scales the rope and snatches the banana which releases a shower of water that soaks all the other monkeys. No big deal. The next day another banana magically appears and one of the monkeys scales the rope, grabs the banana which again releases a shower of water on the other monkeys.This happens three or four days running and leaves a lot of fuming soaked monkeys. On the fifth day when the magic banana appears, a monkey goes to scale the rope at which the other monkeys attack and stop him. On the next say no monkey tries to climb the rope.

Then a monkey is taken out and is replaced with a new one. Sure enough when the banana appears the next day he is the only one to go for it and gets duly beaten up for his trouble. The same the next day.From then on no monkey tries to climb for the banana.

Thereafter every few days one old monkey after another is extracted and replaced with another until there are 10 new monkeys. Interestingly none of the 10 will climb for the magic banana when it is offered.......and not a single one actually knows why not ..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom