Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't mind what CNN have on their website. Possibly nobody will ever notice.

How very droll. Willie the droll troll.

After indulging in our little chat, I have an overwhelming urge to find something more interesting to do. Having just painted the back door I think I'll go and watch it dry.

Toodle pip.

BV
 
If you are feeling uneasy about this Beachnut this video will put your mind to rest (maybe)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...84bXSafUMKe4qAOK2-ziBw&q=Jamie+Mcintyre&hl=en

Only morons now say Flight 77 did not impact the Pentagon. You have to willfully ignore the evidence to make up such a lie and p4t endorse the doltish work of CIT who actually try to sell DVDs with the lies.

I saw this over 7 years ago, sorry; you have failed to comprehend the simple facts of 911 while glomming to the lies and idiotic delusions of p4t-failed aviator’s ideas on 911. You have found your true delusion friends at p4t; have a great weekend pushing failed ideas on the Internet.

How dumb does an idea on 911 have to be for you to spread it? Go cherry pick with Balsamo, he is in the orchard of stupid now picking and selling to more gullible people like you.
 
I'm back.

Seems like I missed nothing. Big surprise. Well after 8 days of sun filled fun, back to the humdrum...lol

TAM:)
 
Hi Bill,

You seem to have overlooked a question directed to you



Thanks in advance :)

Hi 42.You and the other concerned citizens who read along with you would be better judges of that than me.
 
Last edited:
That's the political end of things. I deal in the nuts and bolts so to speak.
So far you have presented p4t-failed information, Lear and his aliens and failed aeronautical tripe from Lear.

What substance do you have on 911? So far you have presented fantasy, lies and some delusional hearsay junk.
 
Hi 42.You and the other concerned citizens who read along with you would be better judges of that than me.
Possibly... if I had an idea of even 'ONE effective action that you're participating in'

But I don't

Which is why I asked you to describe one

FYI: I am inferring that you are purposely weaving and dodging my simple question simply because you are doing NOTHING that could be described as effective.

If I'm wrong, cool... just let me know how/why/etc

OK?
 
I would stake my life that Jamie McInyre meant that from what he saw he had no reason to believe a plane had hit the Pentagon. ...
You are wrong again; from what he saw he confirms a jet did hit the Pentagon. Sorry, but you can spew lies about this instead of listening to Jamie.

You are wrong on this and all your ideas presented on 911. How can you get everything wrong about 911 just like p4t and Lear?
 
Possibly... if I had an idea of even 'ONE effective action that you're participating in'

But I don't

Which is why I asked you to describe one

FYI: I am inferring that you are purposely weaving and dodging my simple question simply because you are doing NOTHING that could be described as effective.

If I'm wrong, cool... just let me know how/why/etc

OK?

Oh well 42....perhaps you will find future posts of mine more compelling....
 
Sincerely Bill, it would be impossible to find them any less compelling

You use many words

You post nothing of any meaning

Why?

Perhaps you should judge on a case-by-case basis instead of a blanket rejection of whatever i might say.
 
I am

Ever since I joined this thread, I have honestly been under the impression that, mostly*, you're merely hinting at and alluding to nebulous stuff without actually saying anything of substance

*mostly: there have been occasions when I've got the idea that you have been consciously trying to perpetuate/promote delusions and other lies

If I'm wrong, please show me where
 
There has been a great deal of research on this subject

In all seriousness, CTism is a psychological disorder and CTists need professional help

Sadly, they ain't gonna get it online... but this is where they live... :(

I'd like to think this forum has helped at least some truthers come back to their senses. Seeing truther arguments destroyed on daily basis would make any reasonable person see the errors in their thinking. I would imagine many a lurker has seen the carnage and decided it best to get on with their lives.

Sadly, this one area that the debunkers will never enjoy the fruit of their labors.
 
I'd like to think this forum has helped at least some truthers come back to their senses.
I'd like to think so too... and my "Sadly, they ain't gonna get it online... but this is where they live..." was merely RealLifetm-based speculation on my part... if I'm wrong then 'cool!'
 
I am

Ever since I joined this thread, I have honestly been under the impression that, mostly*, you're merely hinting at and alluding to nebulous stuff without actually saying anything of substance

*mostly: there have been occasions when I've got the idea that you have been consciously trying to perpetuate/promote delusions and other lies

If I'm wrong, please show me where

Is this nebulous ? The FBI has over 80 videos of the Pentagon incident. They have released only 10 frames total in two tranches of five frames each years apart and a short video from the doubletree motel which shows as little as the ten frames do. How do you justify them not releasing the 80 videos ?
 
Last edited:
Is this nebulous ? The FBI has over 80 videos of the Pentagon incident. They have released only 10 frames total in two tranches of five frames each years apart and a short video from the doubletree motel which shows as little as the ten frames do. How do you justify them not releasing the 80 videos ?


I understand your frustration, bill. I have over 80 winning Powerball tickets, but I haven't been able to cash them in because they don't have the right numbers on them.

And yes, that IS a response relevant to your videos claim. It might take some thought to perceive the analogy.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom