• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Megan McCain "Am I Not Worthy Of Being A Member of Republican Party?" -In A Word, NO!

What is sexist about dispising a brainless, vivious, abusive sociopath who thinks she is sexy and uses that supposed sexiness to sell her image to Faux News viewers as a nutty slut?

"Slut" implies a lack of morals, character or class, expressed in a sexually suggestive way.

You mean expressed in a classless, sexist way.
 
OK, lefty, I think you should stop now.

Surely there are ways that you can express what a worthless turd Coulter is without laying yourself open to charges of misogyny.

Then do that.

I have no idea what she looks like except for the hints you've given me. I have actually seen her once on British TV (that was funny) but her personal appearance made no impression on me.

What I do remember is that she was an insane lying lump of crap. And I can say that without a hint of sexism.

My lawyer advises me that this post is made without prejudice to any post that I may have made in the past or might make in the future in which I may or may not refer to Rush Limbaugh as "a disgusting fat squelching blob of lard". 'Cos that's OK. It just IS.
 
Last edited:
OK, lefty, I think you should stop now.

Surely there are ways that you can express what a worthless turd Coulter is without laying yourself open to charges of misogyny.

Then do that.

I have no idea what she looks like except for the hints you've given me. I have actually seen her once on British TV (that was funny) but her personal appearance made no impression on me.

What I do remember is that she was an insane lying lump of crap. And I can say that without a hint of sexism.

My lawyer advises me that this post is made without prejudice to any post that I may have made in the past or might make in the future in which I may or may not refer to Rush Limbaugh as "a disgusting fat squelching blob of lard". 'Cos that's OK. It just IS.

You have actually watched A.C. on TV, yet you rely on Lefty's "hints" for a physical description? Didn't you pay your £131 BBC tax? You are supposed get a picture along with sound.
 
Last edited:
You're supposed to actually read what's been said.

Lets recap. Dr. A said he saw A.C. on the telly, but only her words were memorable. Now he relies on Lefty's "hints" about her appearance because his memory of actually seeing A.C. is too fuzzy. Usually, people forget the words and remember the face, that is if their telly was actually televising.

But Dr.A's curiosity still has not peaked as he could refresh his foggy memory by looking up a pic of A.C. on the net. Instead he is still relying on Lefty's "hints" for an accurate description.
 
Lets recap. Dr. A said he saw A.C. on the telly, but only her words were memorable. Now he relies on Lefty's "hints" about her appearance because his memory of actually seeing A.C. is too fuzzy. Usually, people forget the words and remember the face, that is if their telly was actually televising.

But Dr.A's curiosity still has not peaked as he could refresh his foggy memory by looking up a pic of A.C. on the net. Instead he is still relying on Lefty's "hints" for an accurate description.


You seem to have an uncanny knack for ferreting out the least substantive part of someone else's post and "arguing" against that while completely overlooking "the broad-side of the barn".

It seems to me that Dr Adequate's main point (correct me if I'm wrong) was that there are plenty of substantive critiques to make regarding Coulter (and others) such that lefty need not make himself a target for the charge of being sexist (or get sidetracked by appearance in any degree).

Your reply quoted above then suggests that maybe Dr Adequate should hone his research skills to gain proper knowledge of her looks??????

Was this an attempt at humor or did you really miss the point that badly?
 
Last edited:
You seem to have an uncanny knack for ferreting out the least substantive part of someone else's post and "arguing" against that while completely overlooking "the broad-side of the barn".

It seems to me that Dr Adequate's main point (correct me if I'm wrong) was that there are plenty of substantive critiques to make regarding Coulter (and others) such that lefty need not make himself a target for the charge of being sexist (or get sidetracked by appearance in any degree).

Your reply quoted above then suggests that maybe Dr Adequate should hone his research skills to gain proper knowledge of her looks??????

Was this an attempt at humor or did you really miss the point that badly?

Please. Dr. A's post didn't even address Lefty's assault on Malkin, the women Lefty has been making sexist comments about for the last several posts. Dr.A's "lying lump of crap" is your idea of a "substantive critique?" Dr.A is concerned that Lefty is leaving himself open to charges of misogyny ( Oh, No!), but otherwise, Dr A and Lefty describes A.C. in similar terms.
 
Dr.A's "lying lump of crap" is your idea of a "substantive critique?" Dr.A is concerned that Lefty is leaving himself open to charges of misogyny ( Oh, No!), but otherwise, Dr A and Lefty describes A.C. in similar terms.

We both take the position that AC is a sociopath. This is supportable by her own blather.

Malkin is trying to share the same niche.

Malkin does only slightly better because she is at least as good looking as AC thinks herself to be.

AC also tries to capitalize on her sex appeal, with her always-too-short skirts to distract people from the absurd proportions of the rest of her bod. I know she is trying for sexy, but it just comes off as skanky.

Most rational women have no use for either Malkin or AC, so this is not just a male thing.
 
Last edited:
We both take the position that AC is a sociopath. This is supportable by her own blather.

Malkin is trying to share the same niche.

Malkin does only slightly better because she is at least as good looking as AC thinks herself to be.

AC also tries to capitalize on her sex appeal, with her always-too-short skirts to distract people from the absurd proportions of the rest of her bod. I know she is trying for sexy, but it just comes off as skanky.

Most rational women have no use for either Malkin or AC, so this is not just a male thing.

So some rational women have use for these pundits? Already you are making progress.
 
At risk of sounding like a weirdo, I don't give a damn what either one looks like, for all their education and supposed ability, neither Malkin or Coulter show they get anything more than a black hat/white hat view of the world. That doesn't hold up in real life, and it sure as hell isn't an attractive trait.
 
At risk of sounding like a weirdo, I don't give a damn what either one looks like, for all their education and supposed ability, neither Malkin or Coulter show they get anything more than a black hat/white hat view of the world. That doesn't hold up in real life, and it sure as hell isn't an attractive trait.

Coulter looks like a reanimated corpse to me. I can't for the life of me see why anyone thinks her boniness is attractive.
 
At risk of sounding like a weirdo, I don't give a damn what either one looks like, for all their education and supposed ability, neither Malkin or Coulter show they get anything more than a black hat/white hat view of the world. That doesn't hold up in real life, and it sure as hell isn't an attractive trait.

In the real world, many people consider compromise a sell out to their principles. Whether that is an attractive or unattractive quality is of course a subjective opinion.
 
In the real world, many people consider compromise a sell out to their principles.


It depends on the subject matter, but if this is an all encompassing perspective on compromise, those holding it are ignorant nearly by definition.

Whether that is an attractive or unattractive quality is of course a subjective opinion.


The attractiveness is indeed, to some degree, subjective.
 

Back
Top Bottom