I wasn't trying for clever.
You succeeded.
I wasn't trying for clever.
You succeeded.
Are you serious how the hell am I supposed to know that without going through the topic again?I would hate to aggravate your colic, but I also refer to Keith Olbermann as K.O.
Uhuh.... That is his opinion. You butchered the English language to the point where anyone looking at your post would see gibberish without reading through seven pages of insanity.BTW: Do you also find Lefty's reference to Coulter as the "boney little harpy" to be "clever to anyone but brain dead idiots?"
Are you serious how the hell am I supposed to know that without going through the topic again?
Uhuh.... That is his opinion. You butchered the English language to the point where anyone looking at your post would see gibberish without reading through seven pages of insanity.
"At this point, I have more respect for Ann Coulter than I do Laura Ingraham because at least Ann Coulter didn’t come back at me with heartless, substance-less attacks about my weight. All I can do is try and be a positive role model for women of my generation and hopefully help show that no matter what industry you are in, what size you are has nothing to do with your worth."
Are you suffering from some sort of head trauma? Remember, Natasha Richardson though she was fine before she collapsed.
As opposed to the eunuch and the harpy, who do try for clever.
There is something ironic about someone's taking offense at another person's calling the worthless pile of deer horns a "boney harpy" and then suggesting that another person yet has suffered brain trauma.
For the record, do you consider the Coulter critter not to be a boney and repulsive little skank?
The whore-trollop indecently exposes the BARE NAKED FLESH OF HER ARMS!!! Because she is a Secret Muslim.And this morning, on my way home from work, a lefty radio host was going on about some brain damaged female right wing radio host calling Michelle Obama trashy. Gotta find out what that was all about.
There is something ironic about someone's taking offense at another person's calling the worthless pile of deer horns a "boney harpy" and then suggesting that another person yet has suffered brain trauma.
For the record, do you consider the Coulter critter not to be a boney and repulsive little skank?
I wasn't being selective. I found your butchering of the English language offensive. I find it offensive that you are lazy and expect anyone to take you seriously.Actually, I was wondering why technoextreme was selective in what he found offensive.
I wasn't being selective. I found your butchering of the English language offensive. I find it offensive that you are lazy and expect anyone to take you seriously.
Yes, yes, a thousand times yes! And do you consider the Clinton critter to be a fat, sagging witch?
Oh, wait, I forgot. You could discuss health care with her in the morning, so it doesn't matter if you'd want to slit your wrists before getting in the sack with her at night.
How much bonier is she than, say, Michelle Obama? Obviously it's not the bones that bother you.
I am appalled that so many liberal men seem to think they get a pass on this because they're talking about "skanky" Republicans.
Why is it that nobody here is interested in what the male members of Congress and political commentators would look like in thongs?
Personally, I resent the implication that all Republicans are EEEEEEEeeeevvvvvviiiiiilllllll, or that all Democrats are EEEEEEEeeeevvvvvviiiiiilllllll. It's utter crap. Both sides over time have had great ideas, and both have had some utterly rotten ones. That's life. Don't like it? Tough.
They're sure as hell not going to give any authority to the pampered princess, particularly not when she hasn't paid her dues, or demonstrated she has the chops to make it. Daddy might have been nominated for the presidency, but the reality is he didn't win, and even if he had, so what? She's still got to show what SHE'S made of, first.
(And, for that matter, if Jenna or Barbara Bush were to start sticking their noses into Republican politics, my reaction to the Party Girls would be the same.)
* UnrepentantSinner;4562682 throws up a little in his mouth
Well said, Brainster. This should be a non-issue. Yet again and again it is brought up, and not just by the sexists here at the JREF, but by nationally-known commentators.Yes, yes, a thousand times yes! And do you consider the Clinton critter to be a fat, sagging witch?
Oh, wait, I forgot. You could discuss health care with her in the morning, so it doesn't matter if you'd want to slit your wrists before getting in the sack with her at night.
You don't get it, do you? It's only sexism to you if it's directed at a Democratic "harpy". Because Republican women aren't really women. This is the same disgusting attitude that lets "liberals" call Condoleeza Rice a "house negro".
Coulter says stupid things. Criticize her for that all you want. But instead it's all about her appearance. How much bonier is she than, say, Michelle Obama? Obviously it's not the bones that bother you.
I never talk about the physical attributes of female politicians (other than to make this kind of point), because I understand they're irrelevant to the discussion. I am appalled that so many liberal men seem to think they get a pass on this because they're talking about "skanky" Republicans.
ETA: Oh, and on the Limbaugh excuse you offered earlier, if you learn anything from El Rushbo, don't make it sexism.