Megan McCain "Am I Not Worthy Of Being A Member of Republican Party?" -In A Word, NO!

[Cicero]

I don't know what that's supposed to prove. Dowd is apolitical, and has used NYT op-ed pages to spew inane gender-based drivel, like your example, for years.

If you're looking for an actual liberal gender crackpot, then you could have gone with Olbermann.

Dowd apolitical? Since when? In 2005, Dowd said:

“But I have no doubt there are plenty of brilliant women who would bring grace and guts to our nation’s op-ed pages.... We just need to find and nurture them.”

The type she wants to nurture are Ellen Goodman, Anna Quindlen, and Molly Ivin, not Michelle Malkin or Monica Crowley.

The tag team of Olbermann and Maddow are of course examples of crackpots.

 

[Cicero]

Lomg and short of it, Palin has nothing between her ears, which is where feminism is seated. What is between her thighs is an inescapable biologicxal phenomenon, and has no bearing on her ability to reason or inclination to think that womenn should have a say in the conduct of public policy beyond cheerfleading for the party line.

Feminism, as you have demonstrated, has zero to do with intellect, and everything to do with political ideology. Conservative women need not apply. If you read the words of feminist leaders regarding Clinton and Broderick, you would realize that they are only concerned with being cheerleaders for the party line.

"Feminists have had to go outside their box at every level to protect Mr. Clinton." Barbara Ledeen (executive director for policy of the Independent Women's Forum)

This sentiment is not just a double entendre, it is a fact.

 

[leftysergeant]

Dowd apolitical? Since when? In 2005, Dowd said:

“But I have no doubt there are plenty of brilliant women who would bring grace and guts to our nation’s op-ed pages.... We just need to find and nurture them.”

The type she wants to nurture are Ellen Goodman, Anna Quindlen, and Molly Ivin, not Michelle Malkin or Monica Crowley.

Well, DUH! Malkin is a trollop and a pit bull, and not much in touch with reality. She is interested in preserving the priviledges that accrue to being pretty asnd rich and screw the fugly, frumpy woman stuck raising three kids on her own.

Malkin is not interested in improving the lives of women outside the investor class, so why should feminists care whether the little slut even has a job?

 

[Cicero]

Well, DUH! Malkin is a trollop and a pit bull, and not much in touch with reality. She is interested in preserving the priviledges that accrue to being pretty asnd rich and screw the fugly, frumpy woman stuck raising three kids on her own.

Malkin is not interested in improving the lives of women outside the investor class, so why should feminists care whether the little slut even has a job?

You just described Maureen Dowd. Why do you and feminists care about her employment status?

 

[leftysergeant]

You just described Maureen Dowd. Why do you and feminists care about her employment status?

Dowd is right occassionally.

But what does the little glamor puss anchor baby propose that would really improve the lives of women in America?

 

[Cicero]

Dowd is right occassionally.

So is a broken clock twice a day.

 

[leftysergeant]

So is a broken clock twice a day.

Puts her ahead of Malkin by three.

 

[Cicero]

Puts her ahead of Malkin by three.

You sound just like the feminist 911 truth grunions that attacked Malkin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-DoxqvqjxM

 

[leftysergeant]

Not a bit of it. I attack Malkin because she is a nutty little slut with no conscience. The only time she ever looked half-way intelligent was when she looked at Alex Jones like he was a brown smelly smear on the Persian rug.

 

[Cleon]

Not a bit of it. I attack Malkin because she is a nutty little slut

...And, apparently, out of sexism.

 

[leftysergeant]

What is sexist about dispising a brainless, vivious, abusive sociopath who thinks she is sexy and uses that supposed sexiness to sell her image to Faux News viewers as a nutty slut?

"Slut" implies a lack of morals, character or class, expressed in a sexually suggestive way.

 

[Roadtoad]

Must... Not... Click... Ignore...

 

[Cleon]

What is sexist about dispising a brainless, vivious, abusive sociopath who thinks she is sexy and uses that supposed sexiness to sell her image to Faux News viewers as a nutty slut?

"Slut" implies a lack of morals, character or class, expressed in a sexually suggestive way.

An attack aimed at a woman because she is a woman. It doesn't get much more sexist than that.

 

[leftysergeant]

An attack aimed at a woman because she is a woman. It doesn't get much more sexist than that.

Not a bit of it. It is because she uses her supposed sex appeal to sell immoral ideas. She is not much of a woman, really. Certainly not a feminist, certainly no friend of feminist causes. She actually more supports the position of privillege for women who are physically attractive and able to hold a rich husband. She isn't really all that co0ncerned with the ability of a woman to obtain employment at a just rate of compensation. She needs to get over herself.

 

[Cicero]

What is sexist about dispising a brainless, vivious, abusive sociopath who thinks she is sexy and uses that supposed sexiness to sell her image to Faux News viewers as a nutty slut?

"Slut" implies a lack of morals, character or class, expressed in a sexually suggestive way.

Lefty lexicon:

Slut: Any female conservative pundit including, but not limited to A.C., Laura Ingraham, Michele Malkin, Kellyanne Fitzpatrick, Heather Higgins, Monica Crowley, Rachel Marsden, Whitney Adams, etc.

Why? They "think" they are "sexy."

 

[Slayhamlet]

What is sexist about dispising a brainless, vivious, abusive sociopath who thinks she is sexy and uses that supposed sexiness to sell her image to Faux News viewers as a nutty slut?

"Slut" implies a lack of morals, character or class, expressed in a sexually suggestive way.

And what, exactly, does Malkin express in a sexually suggestive way? And maybe you can point out where she has called herself "sexy" and how she has used her body suggestively to sell her "image"?

My hunch is that just you don't like the fact that certain men who agree with her call her attractive, and you don't actually have evidence of anything beyond that. If so, it will only confirm my general opinion of your character.

And before you accuse me of anything stupid, let me make it clear that I think she's a twitty, vapid ideologue who gets way more attention than she deserves. I rarely agree with any of her political views. I also think you're a boorish, vapid ideologue whom I will probably be adding to my ignore list.

 

[Slayhamlet]

Not a bit of it. It is because she uses her supposed sex appeal to sell immoral ideas. She is not much of a woman, really. Certainly not a feminist, certainly no friend of feminist causes. She actually more supports the position of privillege for women who are physically attractive and able to hold a rich husband. She isn't really all that co0ncerned with the ability of a woman to obtain employment at a just rate of compensation. She needs to get over herself.

Your ideas about women are repugnant. She's no feminist, but then again, neither are you.

 

[leftysergeant]

Your ideas about women are repugnant. She's no feminist, but then again, neither are you.

It is no more sexist to bash Malkin, nor is it any more specific to her gender than it is to bash a male pervert like the rushblob. Am, I now attacking him for being a man? Hardly. He is, in fact, a failure as a man.

Malkin is trying to steal the Coulter critter's schtick, with not a bit more dignity or class. She only gets away with it because the testosterone-driven bozos that buy her philosophy are too hung up on her sex appeal.

 

[Slayhamlet]

It is no more sexist to bash Malkin, nor is it any more specific to her gender than it is to bash a male pervert like the rushblob. Am, I now attacking him for being a man? Hardly. He is, in fact, a failure as a man.

Except you don't use historically sexist terms against Rush that marginalize him based on nothing more than his sex and whether people of the opposite sex consider him attractive.

Malkin is trying to steal the Coulter critter's schtick, with not a bit more dignity or class. She only gets away with it because the testosterone-driven bozos that buy her philosophy are too hung up on her sex appeal.

You think conservatives would change their opinion if they didn't have a marginally attractive woman who agrees with them? Bizarre. You also continue to fail to provide evidence of anything sexually suggestive on her part in terms of "selling herself". How is she a slut, again?

 

[ParanoidAndroid]

Your ideas about women are repugnant. She's no feminist, but then again, neither are you.

Have to agree with you on this one unless lefty is equally in the habit of using similar terminology for men who fit the same description, which, I can't recall him doing off the top.