Molten Steel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christopher7 said:
That is an asinine assumption made by an ass bent on obfuscating the facts.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you would not say this without evidence. Please enlighten us as to how much thermite would be needed. Remember, there are experts reading, so feel free to use the appropriate equations.

You won't, of course. Because you are lying.
 
Christopher7 said:
Please.

Peter Tully was one of the contractors who told him. You are inferring that he might be lying or he doesn't know what he is talking about. Give it up. You are desperately looking for a reason to deny the molten steel.
Click to expand...
If you know for a fact who the witness is, why bring Loizeaux up at all?
Why isn't your broken record revolving around Peter Tully?
Christopher7 said:
Loizeaux said there were photos and videos of the molten steel being scooped out. You are calling him a liar too.
Furthermore you are ignoring that if it is being "scooped out" it's fluid.
Click to expand...
Who's playing word games? Lots of dirt and rock has been "scooped out" by mechanical shovels. I've heard them referred to as "buckets", too, but that doesn't imply they're used to hold water.
Now, if you have the photos and videos, that might be evidence. Loizeaux saying they exist, or that he was told they exist, is not helpful.
Christopher7 said:
The evidence was destroyed. You are not only defending the destruction of evidence, you are using it that to defend the people who ordered it destroyed.

Furthermore. You are discounting the numerous witnesses who said they saw beams dripping and the firemen who said "molten metal running down the channel rails." You are calling them liars too.

You are playing word games, finding a reason do doubt this quote and another reason to deny that quote.
Click to expand...
No. I'm not defending the destruction of evidence. I'm pointing out that you don't have any. Whether it may have existed at one time I'm sure you can argue into the ground. But you don't have any. If you did, I would expect you to show it.
Christopher7 said:
Your unwillingness to put them all together and see that collectively they confirm the existence of liquid molten steel is proof positive you refuse to accept what you don't want to accept.

Your reasons for denial are straight out of Gravy's denial book and have been used by all his paid puppets. You cannot possibly all be thinking up the exact same denial garbage on your own.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry. Those of us who are based in reality are likely to come to similar conclusions. I have to admit there's certainly a lot more variety on the CT side. Space weapons, thermite, shaped charges of thermite, planes, no planes, missiles, pods, airplane flyovers, Jews, NWO, NWO controlled by Jews. There's quite a menu to choose from. But in this particular case I don't see that as necessarily a positive attribute.
 
That is an asinine assumption made by an ass bent on obfuscating the facts.
Click to expand...
How much termite do you suggest were used?:D



No, my english is not perfect but my physics is reasonable, and better than yours.

And you are not too convincing on the selective witness suppression program.
 
Last edited:
Mercutio said:
Hell, it's not even the most recent true thing I have said.

If you can prove anything I have said wrong, please feel free to correct me. I will thank you for it.

Until then, your own words prove you a liar many times over. You lie on your own behalf, and on behalf of your "witnesses". You are a liar, Christopher7.
Click to expand...
That reminds me of the Paul Simon song "The Boxer"

It is the JREF theme song. The last verse goes.

Lie-la-lie, lie-la-lie-lie-lie-la-lie, lie-la-lie.

You should put together a chorus and sing it in 4 part harmony. Gravy can arrange and conduct. After all, he wrote the lyrics.
 
Last edited:
Toke said:
How much termite do you suggest were used?:D
Click to expand...
I haven't a bloody clue. Neither does anyone here although some absurdly claim they do.

No, my english is not perfect but my physics is reasonable and better than yours.
Click to expand...
Perhaps, but that's not the problem. I am quoting and you are denying witness statements. This is not a language or physics problem, it's either intelligence or honesty.
 
Christopher7 said:
Furthermore. You are discounting the numerous witnesses who said they saw beams dripping and the firemen who said "molten metal running down the channel rails." You are calling them liars too.
Click to expand...

What did they say?

They didn't say "I saw".

They might have said "That idiot says ...... but we know that the fire wasn't hot enough to melt steel".

We can't know because someone that uses the word, "Truth", much too much edited it all out.
 
Christopher7 said:
That reminds me of the Paul Simon song "The Boxer"

It is the JREF theme song. The last verse goes.

Lie-la-lie, lie-la-lie-lie-lie-la-lie lie, lie-la-lie.

You should put together a chorus and sing it in 4 part harmony. Gravy can arrange and conduct. After all, he wrote the lyrics.
Click to expand...

Dude, I have written songs based on "the boxer".

Your pathetic lies don't even float to the top of the cistern to merit a verse. You may think you make a difference--the truth is, I write rebuttals to you because it is a break from the real work I do. I cannot speak for Gravy, but I doubt very much that he worries about you, or even thinks about you, at all.

When you care to address the substantive portions of my comments, please feel free. Bring any actual evidence you have, I implore you. Do your absolute best to humiliate me--I promise, if you succeed I will publicly thank you for correcting me.

Of course... if you could, you would have. This post of yours is as good as an admission that you know you have nothing. That you know you are lying. That you know you are pissing on the graves of thousands. That you are a pathetic wretch.

Please prove me wrong. I would love to think that no human could be so pathetic.
 
Mercutio said:
No, but thanks for playing. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
Click to expand...

Every argument about Molten steel by the debunkers is based in denial of witness accounts and the FACT that the evidence was destroyed.

That's why you are still here playing. Just not very good.
 
Ya gotta love the logic here.

If a JERFer says someone is a liar, then they are, and it's OK to relentlessly insult them.

Rule 12 has a catch 22. :D
 
Christopher7 said:
I haven't a bloody clue. Neither does anyone here although some absurdly claim they do.
Click to expand...
If you don´t have a clue, why do you pick termite?
Why not vanilla ice cream?

Perhaps, but that's not the problem. I am quoting and you are denying witness statements. This is not a language or physics problem, it's either intelligence or honesty.
Click to expand...
I agree completely.:D
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Every argument about Molten steel by the debunkers is based in denial of witness accounts and the FACT that the evidence was destroyed.

That's why you are still here playing. Just not very good.
Click to expand...

Wrong. No cardboard cookie for you. I'd give you points for trying, but you have not actually demonstrated that you are.
 
BigAl said:
What did they say?

They didn't say "I saw".

They might have said "That idiot says ...... but we know that the fire wasn't hot enough to melt steel".

We can't know because someone that uses the word, "Truth", much too much edited it all out.
Click to expand...
Of course dear. Anything you say. :boggled:
 
Christopher7 said:
Ya gotta love the logic here.

If a JERFer says someone is a liar, then they are, and it's OK to relentlessly insult them.

Rule 12 has a catch 22. :D
Click to expand...

When I say you are a liar, it is my obligation to prove that you are. Fortunately, you make my job very easy, because you lie more often than you tell the truth*.

* I did not actually crunch the numbers here, so I may be wrong. If one counts labeling his posts correctly as being his own, that may be a truth, and I may be technically wrong. I doubt it, actually, but it is possible. And I admit I did not do the math.

Of course, C7's lies allow us to call him a liar, because he lies about the major points in his posts, whether or not he is truthful about trivial matters.
 
stateofgrace said:
Classic stuff Chris,

I am not putting words into statements that you do not agree with; I am simply asking you very civil questions and quoting your statements that you fully agree with.

So, let me get this straight, you think that death squads controlled by a psychopathic Government went into three ( it is four actually ) fully occupied buildings prior to Sept 11th and planted lots and lots of thermite, so much so that when ignited it brought down these buildings and kept metal, by the ton, molten for weeks after it was ignited. And now you are saying that the same death squads planted explosives inside each of these buildings, right?

Yet, and here is the kicker,Chris, of the thousands of people that were inside these building nobody, not a single person noticed. Not a single person from the thousands spotted death squads planting lots and lots of thermite and lots and lots explosives inside the buildings.Not a single person, seven years later, figured out that the guy in the coveralls, they saw,wasn't really upgrading the telephone system but was planting tons and tons of thermite and explosives. Not a single people involved in the logistics of such a mammoth task as stepped forward and confirmed any of this. The suppliers, the buyers, the planners, the death squads themselves, nobody as stepped forward to confirm your beliefs.

Why do think that is Chris? Maybe they are all in denial, what do you think ?
Click to expand...

BigAl said:
A thousand pounds of thermite doesn't melt much of small car and it doesn't leave any little pools of molten steel for more than a few seconds.
4 Pounds of Thermite barely melts a PC chassis.
Click to expand...

Any comment Chris, a single comment maybe?

Maybe "LALALA, I'm not listening" ?
 
Christopher7 said:
Cut the voluminous crap and I might be able to find them. :D
Click to expand...

Again, I protest that the burden of proof is on me to show that you are lying. My posts must be lengthy if they are to include evidence. I hope you are in agreement that I should not be allowed to call you a liar without demonstrating that you are, in fact, a liar.
 
BigAl said:
A thousand pounds of thermite doesn't melt much of small car and it doesn't leave any little pools of molten steel for more than a few seconds.
Click to expand...
You haven't got a clue what different kinds of thermire can do. You don't even know that there are different kinds of thermite.

The arrogant idiots who say they know how much thermite it would take are just blowin smoke.
 
Mercutio said:
Again, I protest that the burden of proof is on me to show that you are lying. My posts must be lengthy if they are to include evidence. I hope you are in agreement that I should not be allowed to call you a liar without demonstrating that you are, in fact, a liar.
Click to expand...
Dude, you can call me anything your little heart desires ICCL. :cool:

However, it does make you look like a ass when you run it into the ground. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom