CIT Presents Their Exhaustive Witness List - Yep, Still No Flyover Witness

[bill smith]

LOL! Do you believe in the stupidest hypothesis ever, AKA the Pentagon flyover, bill? How cute!

I used to be very interested in the Pentagon but I grew wary of it after a time . It has something of the honeypot about it I find. Given that there is no 757 in the Pentagon though, a flyover seems to be the most lkely explanation.

 

[nicepants]

Given that there is no 757 in the Pentagon though, a flyover seems to be the most lkely explanation.

Actually the most likely explanation would be that they removed it sometime between 9/11/2001 and now.

 

[dtugg]

I used to be very interested in the Pentagon but I grew wary of it after a time . It has something of the honeypot about it I find. Given that there is no 757 in the Pentagon though, a flyover seems to be the most lkely explanation.

Hey maybe you should read up on CIT's "evidence" and become their waterboy here. Please. It'll be fun!

 

[stateofgrace]

I used to be very interested in the Pentagon but I grew wary of it after a time . It has something of the honeypot about it I find. Given that there is no 757 in the Pentagon though, a flyover seems to be the most lkely explanation.

Really ?

And of course you are now going to prove this,right?

Start by offering up a single fly over witness.

 

[twinstead]

Really ?

And of course you are now going to prove this,right?

Start by offering up a single fly over witness.

Or evidence the first responders are lying

 

[beachnut]

Have a look at this link and use F11 to toggle fullscreen on/off. It really gives the idea doesn't it. Is that RR airport I can see just over there ?

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/Pentagn_Approach.jpg Pentagon flyover

What kind of plane is that. They are not flying over the Pentagon, they are flying around. Why did you post this? Everyone here knows the airport is right next to the Pentagon. Why are you void of all knowledge associated with 911? You have no clue on this one.

I used to be very interested in the Pentagon but I grew wary of it after a time . It has something of the honeypot about it I find. Given that there is no 757 in the Pentagon though, a flyover seems to be the most lkely explanation.

Yes I expect you to pick the lie and repeat it. You repeat lies from other people and you have no clue, no evidence, no knowledge on the subject.

How disrespectful to those who died in the Pentagon from the terrorists you apologize for due to your ignorance on 911.

You believe in all the big lies from 911Truth and you have no evidence to support your delusion. You failed to have a rational story about the steel you have no clue what you were talking about. No you have no plane impacting the Pentagon. Why do you apologizes for terrorists?

 

[bill smith]

What kind of plane is that. They are not flying over the Pentagon, they are flying around. Why did you post this? Everyone here knows the airport is right next to the Pentagon. Why are you void of all knowledge associated with 911? You have no clue on this one.

Yes I expect you to pick the lie and repeat it. You repeat lies from other people and you have no clue, no evidence, no knowledge on the subject.

How disrespectful to those who died in the Pentagon from the terrorists you apologize for due to your ignorance on 911.

You believe in all the big lies from 911Truth and you have no evidence to support your delusion. You failed to have a rational story about the steel you have no clue what you were talking about. No you have no plane impacting the Pentagon. Why do you apologizes for terrorists?

It might be a chopper I suppose. I just wanted to give a similar view to the one the flyover pilot may have had. Imagine the smoke he might have been flying through....throttling back....airbrakes maybe....runway 15 coming up fast....SQUEEEK....FULL REVERSE THRUST....you know the way it goes.

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/Pentagn_Approach.jpg Pentagon flyover

 

[beachnut]

It might be a chooper I suppose. I just wanted to give a similar view to the one the flyover pilot my have had. Imagine the smoke he might have been flying through....throttling back....airbrakes maybe....runway 15 coming up fast....SQUEEEK....FULL REVERSE THRUST....you know the way it goes.

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/Pentagn_Approach.jpg Pentagon flyover

Sad all the DNA from the passengers was in the Pentagon; your idea is but a delusional lie. Your disrespect and apologies for terrorists is sad too.

 

[bill smith]

Sad all the DNA from the passengers was in the Pentagon; your idea is but a delusional lie. Your disrespect and apologies for terrorists is sad too.

Didn't they identify hijacker DNA too ? I always wondered where they they got the control samples from. You know, you find some DNA on the ground you pick it up and put it in the DNA machine and it pops out a name....Hani Hanjour for instance . But where did the machine get the sample to compare the DNA on the ground to ?

 

[beachnut]

Didn't they identify hijacker DNA too ? I always wondered where they they got the control samples from. You know, you find some DNA on the ground you pick it up and put it in the DNA machine and it pops out a name....Hani Hanjour for instance . But where did the machine get the sample to compare the DNA on the ground to ?

Your lack of flying knowledge is only surpassed by your lack of knowledge on 911. At 470 knots, you will over shoot and impact well past the end of the runway. You like fantasy, and you post it. I expect now that ignorance extends to DNA and logic.


The terrorist on the flight had rented cars and stayed in rooms. They collected samples from the cars and rooms to make DNA profiles of possible terrorists, and they matched those profiles to the terrorist DNA found in the Pentagon.

You have picked another lie to support with your zero evidence defense.

 

[nicepants]

It might be a chopper I suppose. I just wanted to give a similar view to the one the flyover pilot may have had. Imagine the smoke he might have been flying through....throttling back....airbrakes maybe....runway 15 coming up fast....SQUEEEK....FULL REVERSE THRUST....you know the way it goes.

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/Pentagn_Approach.jpg Pentagon flyover

They're a little bit high for fooling people into believing that they hit the Pentagon. One of CIT's star eyewitnesses even said that the plane had to pull up to keep from hitting a street sign. The plane in the photo you posted looks to be at least 1500 feet or so above ground level. It's also way too far north to be on CIT's flight path.

ETA: Wait...are you suggesting that the plane flew over the pentagon & landed at Reagan? At the speeds that plane was going and altitudes it was flying there's no way it's landing anywhere at that airport on the first approach.

Didn't they identify hijacker DNA too ? I always wondered where they they got the control samples from. You know, you find some DNA on the ground you pick it up and put it in the DNA machine and it pops out a name....Hani Hanjour for instance . But where did the machine get the sample to compare the DNA on the ground to ?

Probably hair or skin tissue from their apartments/hotel rooms/cars, etc.

 

[bill smith]

They're a little bit high for fooling people into believing that they hit the Pentagon. One of CIT's star eyewitnesses even said that the plane had to pull up to keep from hitting a street sign. The plane in the photo you posted looks to be at least 1500 feet or so above ground level. It's also way too far north to be on CIT's flight path.

ETA: Wait...are you suggesting that the plane flew over the pentagon & landed at Reagan? At the speeds that plane was going and altitudes it was flying there's no way it's landing anywhere at that airport on the first approach.


Probably hair or skin tissue from their apartments/hotel rooms/cars, etc.

Yes that might explain the DNA alright. Good catch.

 

[tfk]

I used to be very interested in the Pentagon but I grew wary of it after a time . It has something of the honeypot about it I find. Given that there is no 757 in the Pentagon though, a flyover seems to be the most lkely explanation.

For those who might not yet appreciate the depths of bill's fantasies, is term "honey pot" is revealing.

In his fertile imagination, the ebil gubbamint has constructed wheels within wheels. In this particular case, a non-conspiracy wrapped inside a conspiracy. A feint. A juke.

In other words, they directed their agents to really hijack Flight 77 and fly it into the Pentagon, but have planted all kinds of fake information that it was NOT Flight 77 that flew into the Pentagon. Thereby drawing all the conspiracy theorists to this fake conspiracy (which is, of course a real conspiracy. Just a real conspiracy of a different type) and away from the OTHER real conspiracies.

Thereby draining resources and credibility from those pursuing the other real conspiracy when it is finally proven that Flight 77 DID fly into the Pentagon.

(Caution: if you read this too many times because you cannot believe someone would actually propose something this stupid, your head might explode.)

Therefore, if Flight 77 is proven to NOT have flown into the Pentagon, a Gubbamint conspiracy is revealed, of course.
And when Flight 77 is proven to HAVE flown into the Pentagon, a Gubbamint conspiracy is also revealed. Of course.

Perfectly sensible. Of course.

tom

 

[Pinch]

It might be a chopper I suppose. I just wanted to give a similar view to the one the flyover pilot may have had. Imagine the smoke he might have been flying through....throttling back....airbrakes maybe....runway 15 coming up fast....SQUEEEK....FULL REVERSE THRUST....you know the way it goes.

Dumb as a post, I think the saying goes.

 

[bill smith]

For those who might not yet appreciate the depths of bill's fantasies, is term "honey pot" is revealing.

In his fertile imagination, the ebil gubbamint has constructed wheels within wheels. In this particular case, a non-conspiracy wrapped inside a conspiracy. A feint. A juke.

In other words, they directed their agents to really hijack Flight 77 and fly it into the Pentagon, but have planted all kinds of fake information that it was NOT Flight 77 that flew into the Pentagon. Thereby drawing all the conspiracy theorists to this fake conspiracy (which is, of course a real conspiracy. Just a real conspiracy of a different type) and away from the OTHER real conspiracies.

Thereby draining resources and credibility from those pursuing the other real conspiracy when it is finally proven that Flight 77 DID fly into the Pentagon.

(Caution: if you read this too many times because you cannot believe someone would actually propose something this stupid, your head might explode.)

Therefore, if Flight 77 is proven to NOT have flown into the Pentagon, a Gubbamint conspiracy is revealed, of course.
And when Flight 77 is proven to HAVE flown into the Pentagon, a Gubbamint conspiracy is also revealed. Of course.

Perfectly sensible. Of course.

tom

Hello there again

Boo hoo...you're bad-mouthing me again. It's not fair.Just because you coudn't get your way with me. Boo hoo. lol

 

[tsig]

...oh, and the NWO stole Steven Jones's cold fusion research..

Well he sole it from the aliens to begin with.

 

[Bobert]

Didn't they identify hijacker DNA too ? I always wondered where they they got the control samples from. You know, you find some DNA on the ground you pick it up and put it in the DNA machine and it pops out a name....Hani Hanjour for instance . But where did the machine get the sample to compare the DNA on the ground to ?

Bill,
I am assuming you meant this as a joke?
If so very poor taste IMHO.
Do you have any clue whatsoever the complexities involved in DNA collection and analysis?
You really sound like you are shooting from the hip and given you are a no-planer that is really no surprise.
You no-planers and CIT CULT followers are a fringe of a fringe of a fringe of a fringe.....
Welcome to ignore.

 

[tfk]

It might be a chopper I suppose. I just wanted to give a similar view to the one the flyover pilot may have had. Imagine the smoke he might have been flying through....throttling back....airbrakes maybe....runway 15 coming up fast....SQUEEEK....FULL REVERSE THRUST....you know the way it goes.

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/Pentagn_Approach.jpg Pentagon flyover

The fact that you cannot identify what is happening in this picture proves how empty is your knowledge of flying.

You are looking out of the passenger (right side) window of a small plane ("Flugzeug" means "airplane") over the right wing at the Pentagon. You can tell the the leading edge of the wing is to the left in the photo by the curvature of the wing, which is greatly foreshortened because of the perspective.

The plane is right where you would expect it to be (at about 800' AGL if it were "turning onto the base leg" in preparation for landing at Reagan's runway 15. This would be the orientation if the pilot were doing "touch & go's" in a right traffic pattern, or approaching the airport from the south-west.

As always, the amount that you don't know PLUS the fact that you will listen to nobody who does know, renders your proclamations about any of this stuff inconsequential.

BTW, the last I heard of DNA evidence is that they had identified all but one of the passengers, plus an UNKNOWN group of four individuals. They were able to identify the passangers because their families donated samples from hair brushes and tooth brushes (and occasionally from closely related individuals). But the families of the hijackers back in Saudi Arabia were, somehow, reluctant to cooperate.

 

[tsig]

It might be a chopper I suppose. I just wanted to give a similar view to the one the flyover pilot may have had. Imagine the smoke he might have been flying through....throttling back....airbrakes maybe....runway 15 coming up fast....SQUEEEK....FULL REVERSE THRUST....you know the way it goes.

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/Pentagn_Approach.jpg Pentagon flyover

Enjoying a "Walter Mitty Moment" are we?

There was no fly over therefore there was no flyover pilot.

There were flies over the dead people parts strewn all around. Is that what you meant?

 

[tfk]

Hello there again

Boo hoo...you're bad-mouthing me again. It's not fair.Just because you coudn't get your way with me. Boo hoo. lol

Here is how you described it previously:
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04T49GGG7HFO/post25252

I wonder if there is any way to turn this back on them...the arrogant gits. ... I saw the clues being laid, and the implicit direct threats. I guessed there were being honey-pots offered. The 'doublethink' which I think is also known as 'cognitive sissonance'(or at least a variant of it is) was another. I think for instance that the Pentagon was an example of the 'honeypot'(I sometimes thought it was a poison pill).

and

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04T49GGG7HFO/post55517

The Pentagon just for fun because we don't really need it and there may be booby-raps. Honeypots are always dangerous.lol

Now, for the record here, is there ANY aspect of my interpretation of what you meant by the word "honeypot" that is incorrect or misleading in the slightest?
___

Ultimately, I HAVE to agree with you, Juan.

Telling the cold, factual truth about what you state is EXACTLY equivalent to "bad mouthing" you.

Any thoughtful person would have the common sense to be embarrassed about that state of affairs.