CIT Presents Their Exhaustive Witness List - Yep, Still No Flyover Witness

[BCR]

I decided to drop by the CIT home to see if they have made any progress yet. Aldo has just presented an exhaustive eyewitness list by categories of observations. Even in their list, one major omission...no fly-over witness category.

CIT Eyewitness List

Oh my, how could this have happened?

I know, this is an old thread, but CIT has done some recent updates grasping for straws like nothing I have ever seen and still not one fly-over witness even though they confirmed some very good POV's (like the Khavkin residence). From the balconey, they had a perfect veiw of the "fly-over". Great work CIT!

Oh my, looks like CIT has blocked my IP address since I posted this, so the links don't work for me now. That's okay though, I'm creating pdf's of the pages and I'll link to those later on.

 

[beachnut]

Great work CIT!

They post people who saw 77 impact the Pentagon. Why do they refute themselves?

 

[BCR]

I'll post the pictures they are using shortly. If ANYONE would have seen a fly-over, well they just presented a solid case. Problem is, the witness did NOT see a flyover and was too far away to be suckered by the "magical illusion".

 

[BCR]

DS Khavkin POV

The eyewitness that CIT presented photographic evidence for was DS Khavkin. To start, what did Khavkin state they observed?

We live in Arlington, VA just outside of Washington, DC in a high-rise building on the eight floor. Our balcony faces the city, with a panoramic view of the Pentagon, National Airport, and the entire downtown area of Washington, DC. We were watching the events unfolding on TV in New York. Then, at about 9:40 am Eastern Daylight Time, my husband and I heard an aircraft directly overhead. At first, we thought it was the jets that sometimes fly overhead. However, it appeared to be a small commercial aircraft. The engine was at full throttle.

First, the plane knocked down a number of street lamp poles, then headed directly for the Pentagon and crashed on the lawn near the west side the Pentagon. A huge fireball exploded with thick black smoke."

According to CIT's on-the-scene investigator, this is an aerial shot of Khavkin's POV.

I can confirm from my trips to the area that this is indeed the building, located at Columbia Pike and South Courthouse Road. The flight path near this building has also been confirmed by the police dispatch audio recorded at the time of the event.

Here are six other images taken from the balcony POV presented by the cracker jack CIT investigator.

Conclusion: The Khavkin's could not have seen the plane hit the poles or Pentagon.

Obviously I do not agree with this conclusion, but I think what is more important is what they could see. If the plane had flown past, to the right, or to the left, the Khavkin's would have seen it...period! CIT once again proves the "official story" correct.

 

[dtugg]

I see they are still lying about Roosevelt Roberts being a flyover witness.

Could they possibly be any more pathetic?

Hi Craig! When can we expect to see your next sockpuppet?

 

[BCR]

I see they are still lying about Roosevelt Roberts being a flyover witness.

Could they possibly be any more pathetic?

Hi Craig! When can we expect to see your next sockpuppet?

But notice, from this POV represented here, a perfect view of what Roberts would have seen. Could it be that Roberts saw AAL77?

 

[The Big Dog]

I see the fraudulent mutts mention Frank Probst for the first time in a couple of years after I brought him up. They talked to him, hell they say: "Frank Probst (CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT)"

So Frank Probst CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT:

American Airlines Flight 77 approached from the west, coming in low over the nearby five-story Navy Annex on a hill overlooking the Pentagon.

"He has lights off, wheels up, nose down," Probst recalled. The plane seemed to be accelerating directly toward him. He froze.

"I knew I was dead," he said later. "The only thing I thought was, 'Damn, my wife has to go to another funeral, and I'm not going to see my two boys again.'."

He dove to his right. He recalls the engine passing on one side of him, about six feet away.

The plane's right wing went through a generator trailer "like butter," Probst said. The starboard engine hit a low cement wall and blew apart.

CONTACTED
INTERVIEWED
CONFIRMED

Somebody stick a fork in those mutts, they are farking done. Everything that CIT has said about no SOC witnesses is a lie.

CONTACTED
INTERVIEWED
CONFIRMED

CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

 

[BCR]

Like I said, CIT is doing a fine job

 

[The Big Dog]

Like I said, CIT is doing a fine job

CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

what a bunch of jokers these clowns are

CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

Confirmed SoC confirmed light pole impact confirmed pentagon impact

Thanks guys!

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Where's TheLoneBedouin? Anyone?

Oh wait. That's right.

 

[The Big Dog]

From: "Lagasse, William, , PFPA"
To: "'[email protected] '"


Dear Sir rest assured it was a Boeing 757 that flew into the building that
day, I was on duty as a pentagon police sgt. I was refueling my vehicle at
the barraks k gas station that day adjacent to the aircrafts flight path.
It was close enough that i could see the windows had the shades pulled down,
it struck several light poles next to rt 27 and struck a trailer used to
store construction equipment for the renovation of the pentagon that was to
the right of the fueselage impact point. The fact that you are insinuating
that this was staged and a fraud is unbelievable. You ask were the debris
is...well it was in the building..I saw it everywhere. I swear to god you
people piss me off to no end. I invite you and you come down and I will walk
you through it step by step. I have more than a few hours in general
aviation aircraft and can identify commercial airliners. Have you ever seen
photos of other aircraft accident photos...there usually isnt huge amounts
of debris left...how much did you see from the WTC?...are those fake
aircraft flying into the building. I know that this will make no diffrence
to you because to even have a websight like this you are obviously a
diffrent sort of thinker.

Naturally Bill is right.

CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

 

[Thunder]

I like these guys:

Claims they "Saw" impact of "plane"/large airliner-were in a position to possibly confirm one:
1. Deb Anlauf (CONTACTED by CIT, would not return call)
2. Donald Bouchoux (military consultant. CONTACTED by CIT, would not return call)
3. Mike Walter (had dinner with CIT)
4. Sean Boger (CONFIRMED the north side, impact deduced we believe)
5. Pam Bradley (unconfirmed account/witness)
6. Hugh "Tim" Timmerman (Dawn Vignola's roomate, unavailable for comment)
7. James R. Cissell
8. Daryl Donley
9. Bobby Eberle (came forward well after the event, Jeff Gannon's boss)
10. Penny Elgas
11. Mary Ann Owens
12. Scott Perry
13. Frank Probst (CONTACTED/CONFIRMED)
Noel Sepulveda, Navy Master Sgt.
14. G. T. Stanley (unconfirmed name/witness)
15. Steve Storti
16. Carla Thompson (unconfirmed name/witness)
17. Dave Winslow, AP Radio reporter (CONTACTED by CIT, did not return call)
18. Terrance Kean (Unreachable)
19. Dave Marra (dubious, questionable witness-claims plane cartwheeled into 20. building)
20. Mark Petitt (VERY dubious account)
21. Aziz El Hallou (Debunked lying witness, proven to be at Navy Annex)
22. Robert A Leonard(driving northbound in the HOV lanes on I-395; Pentagon is on the left. The plane vanished, absorbed by the building, and there was a slight pause. Then a huge fireball rose into the sky.")
23. Mitch Mitchell, Ret. Army Col., CBS news correspondent (account is problematic)
24. Mike Dobbs (according to writer, not confirmed, not his own words)
25. Joe Harrington (seems like it made impact before Wedge-in South Parking lot)
26. Rick Renzi (corrupt congressman, listed as law student, has plane "dive bombing", very peculiar account)

"Saw" a plane & impact from far away, but DID NOT see a second plane/jet shadowing/chasing and veering away as the impact happened:
27. Steve Anderson, USA Today Editor (saw impact from USA Today building)
Don Wright (a commuter plane, two-engined )
Don Chauncey (small commuter plane)
Steve Gerard (saw small corporate jet with no markings) (CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT)
28. Lesley Kelly, Cmdr. U.S. Navy (Ret.) (near impossible to see the plane approach from DC)
29. James Robbins (a national-security analyst & NRO contributor for National Review, William F Buckley (CIA) publication saw silver flash, "diving in an unrecoverable angle")
Ken Ford (prop plane flying up river from National)
30.Christopher Munsey, Navy Times reporter


"saw" impact of plane? does that mean they are paid by the NWO to say as such?



The actually found for us witnesses that saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Wonderful!!!

They have done our work for us!! Thanks CTists!!

 

[BCR]

I see the fraudulent mutts mention Frank Probst for the first time in a couple of years after I brought him up. They talked to him, hell they say: "Frank Probst (CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT)"

So Frank Probst CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT:

American Airlines Flight 77 approached from the west, coming in low over the nearby five-story Navy Annex on a hill overlooking the Pentagon.

"He has lights off, wheels up, nose down," Probst recalled. The plane seemed to be accelerating directly toward him. He froze.

"I knew I was dead," he said later. "The only thing I thought was, 'Damn, my wife has to go to another funeral, and I'm not going to see my two boys again.'."

He dove to his right. He recalls the engine passing on one side of him, about six feet away.

The plane's right wing went through a generator trailer "like butter," Probst said. The starboard engine hit a low cement wall and blew apart.

CONTACTED
INTERVIEWED
CONFIRMED

Somebody stick a fork in those mutts, they are farking done. Everything that CIT has said about no SOC witnesses is a lie.

CONTACTED
INTERVIEWED
CONFIRMED

CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

Of course CIT responds to this by saying...

For the record....not everyone we spoke with was recorded and agreed to an interview.

Frank Probst being one.

Although we talked to him over the phone he did not agree to an interview and was very vague and defensive.

Of course we know why since his account is proven false by all the independent witnesses who were not used as part of the propaganda like Probst was who was even featured in the ASCE report.

Whoops...Probst went under da bus.

 

[The Big Dog]

Of course CIT responds to this by saying...

Whoops...Probst went under da bus.

Gee I wonder if there is enough room under that bus what with the cab driver, the Priest, Probst's co-worker, Morin, Boger, etc etc etc

What a bunch of frauds. That is CONTACTED/CONFIRMED by everyone who has read their garbage.

Probst: SOC IMPACT CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

 

[Jackanory]

Has anybody told Roundhead?

 

[T.A.M.]

Has anybody told Roundhead?

good idea. He has been around as of late, and might be a good ball of yarn for the boys here.

TAM

 

[bob the analyst]

That was a lot of work, well done sir.

 

[BCR]

Gee I wonder if there is enough room under that bus what with the cab driver, the Priest, Probst's co-worker, Morin, Boger, etc etc etc

What a bunch of frauds. That is CONTACTED/CONFIRMED by everyone who has read their garbage.

Probst: SOC IMPACT CONTACTED/CONFIRMED/INTERVIEWED by CIT

It is a big bus...

 

[Bobert]

....and it seems they need quite frequently.
I wonder who will be next?

 

[The Big Dog]

....and it seems they need quite frequently.
I wonder who will be next?

Probably Dylan Avery, et al. The persistently incompetent internet fraudsters have been busy throwing the Loose Change boys under the Bus too. Aldo has been calling them out on their web site, and the fraudsters have completely hijacked the Loose Change Board. Too bad the mods over there don’t have the testicular fortitude to clamp down on bafflingly profane buttertub Aldo.

Anyway, what have we learned? That CIT has interviewed SoC witnesses, has confirmed their testimony and falsely represent that there are no such witnesses.

Stick a fork in these mutts, they are done.