• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
SaiGirl said:
The pictures and videos tell the story.

The way the censorship works here is pretty obvious.

Links and images are simply not allowed.

Its called "gagging".
Click to expand...

I have bolded this word.

Can you please post a link or image that is censored "here"?

If not please type in the address to such a link or image.
 
Last edited:
it is funny, I can guarantee you, if Ron Paul had won, that sign would read,

"BUSH=PAUL"

TAM:)
 
240-185 said:
I thought these were three different ways to destroy the towers. Does such a truther who thinks all three were used exist? :confused:
Click to expand...

Yes, I've debated at least 2, possibly 3 like that. They post articles from Steven Jones, Judy Wood and Rense.com, and JAQ off when you point out that those views are mutually incompatible.

I had one of such twoofers in mind when I was testing out your bingo, and was surprised he didn't get a much higher score.

But I like your site, nonetheless. Bookmarked.
 
debunker9145 said:
I want to forget about truthers. How do i do this? I was so happy when i was living my life care free before i learned about them, and now i am so depressed that people actually believe in that stuff. I want it to go back to like it was before. :covereyes
Click to expand...

It's easy... turn off your internet browser of choice. Or, alternatively, don't point it at sites where troofers wind up gathering to ambush the unsuspecting with their lies and frauds. Once you unplug from the internet, 9/11 truth ceases to exist.
 
johnny karate said:
You should probably go back to arguing what words mean instead of attempting to be clever. You're slightly less terrible at the former.
Click to expand...

I am arguing what words mean. "Gagging", normally a wordless activity, doesn't fit with a verbose, animated reaction to fresh truther blood. "Excitement" and "arousal" fit much better.
 
JihadJane said:
I am arguing what words mean. "Gagging", normally a wordless activity, doesn't fit with a verbose, animated reaction to fresh truther blood. "Excitement" and "arousal" fit much better.
Click to expand...


Gagging can be quite animated. And the verbosity is not something that has to happen at the same time as the gagging. Your attempt at pseudo-intellectualism is noted and dismissed.
 
eromitlab said:
Once you unplug from the internet, 9/11 truth ceases to exist.
Click to expand...

This is pretty much fact. Except for on a few sites on the internet, 9-11 truth does not exist in our world.

Isn't it wonderful to have the option to simply unplug from their lunacy??
 
Just a friendly little comment on the events of the last day or two:

We have had 4 suspensions of people who post as debunkers, or frequent posters in the 9/11 subforum, in the last day or so.

I know some of you post here mainly because the truthers are easy targets for your scorn, but for those who post here for many other reasons, I suggest some reflection, once again, is in order.

Just recently in a thread today, I caved into the obvious trolling and baiting of one of the few truthers that come here now (HI) and called him something that luckily was severe enough for the autosensor to detect. The others obviously were not so lucky, and gave into the baiting even after mod warnings.

We have had excellent posters such as pomeroo get banned, as a result of being unable to (or not wanting to) keep ourselves civil, and above their swipes and comments.

We have to resist. The truthers that have remained here, for the most part (Heiwa and RedIbis may be exceptions) are here now ONLY to antagonize, irritate, and generally cause trouble. If you wish to remain on the forum, you must practice restraint.

I made the mistake of taking HI off ignore, and I will not be that foolish again. If ignore is not the thing for you, then all I can say is try to rationalize why the poster is baiting or trolling, and that may help. Remember, the problem is with them, not us.

Take it for what it is worth...

TAM:)
 
This isn't related to any 9/11 conspiracy. Heck, it's not really a conspiracy theory at all, but it does come from a truther:

Demand911Truth @ Digg said:
If Hamas is guilty of war crimes, then they should be investigated, but only AFTER Israel.

Israel is the aggressor, Israel committed far greater crimes, and Israel did it with American taxpayers' money.
Click to expand...


I like how he has determined that Israel's alleged war crimes are greater than Hamas' alleged war crimes before either have been investigated for alleged war crimes...

It's just typical of a conspiracy theorist, you know...

Source: Why NGOs Are Not Investigating Hamas War Crimes (direct)
 
Someone should really investigate hummus for war crimes.

I'm pretty sure that the noxious nether nerve agent brought about by its consumption has been outlawed by the Geneva Convention.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
This isn't related to any 9/11 conspiracy. Heck, it's not really a conspiracy theory at all, but it does come from a truther:




I like how he has determined that Israel's alleged war crimes are greater than Hamas' alleged war crimes before either have been investigated for alleged war crimes...

It's just typical of a conspiracy theorist, you know...

Source: Why NGOs Are Not Investigating Hamas War Crimes (direct)
Click to expand...

Related to this I do find in my readings and dealings with the truthers, that there seems to be a large contingent of them that are anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian. I am unsure if this is a chicken before the egg argument (are the pro-palestinian because of 9/11, or are they 9/11 truthers because they are pro-palestinian, and the hijackers were arabs), or if it is significant at all.

TAM:)
 
orphia nay said:
Yes, I've debated at least 2, possibly 3 like that. They post articles from Steven Jones, Judy Wood and Rense.com, and JAQ off when you point out that those views are mutually incompatible.

I had one of such twoofers in mind when I was testing out your bingo, and was surprised he didn't get a much higher score.

But I like your site, nonetheless. Bookmarked.
Click to expand...

In fact, classical twoofers won't exceed 200 points, even 150. Only hardcore antisemitic conspiracists who buy anything which is against official stuff can overtake the 200 points.
However, some truthers can't be evaluated with that crackpot index. I just evaluated Heiwa and I scored 100, despite of his non-sensical speech
 
Last edited:
parky76 said:
This is pretty much fact. Except for on a few sites on the internet, 9-11 truth does not exist in our world.

Isn't it wonderful to have the option to simply unplug from their lunacy??
Click to expand...

Are there no books in your wonderful world?

Cl1mh4224rd said:
Gagging can be quite animated. And the verbosity is not something that has to happen at the same time as the gagging. Your attempt at pseudo-intellectualism is noted and dismissed.
Click to expand...

What does being able to spell "pseudo-intellectualism" prove? Perhaps johnny karate could post some pictures illustrating her/his predicament.
 
On the subject of word meanings and their importance: Debunker is an anagram of beer dunker. Surely that means something of profound etymological significance? :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom